A unified account seems to fix the problem. I went to Special:MergeAccount and after I could get in Huggle. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of other stuff is broken as well. For example, blocking. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 19:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8, Archive 9, Archive 10, Archive 11

A unified account seems to fix the problem. I went to Special:MergeAccount and after I could get in Huggle. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of other stuff is broken as well. For example, blocking. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 19:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8, Archive 9, Archive 10, Archive 11

Template loop detected: Wikipedia talk:Huggle/Changes

Hi, I'm from the german wikipedia, where flagged revisions are active. Huggle is used by some of our recent changes patrollers (yay to Huggle :-)). Therefore it would be really great if you could include interaction with flagged revisions as an option. Reverts are completely fine and will be flagged automatically, the feature we would like to have is the possibility to flag good edits as sighted from the Huggle interface. As it is now, all the checking of good edits has to be done twice if the RC-patroller uses huggle. The other supported project that uses flagged revisions is the ru.WP, so they would be happy as well. Any chance? Best, --P. Birken (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe there's a button for sighting revisions in version 0.8.3 (the latest released version). Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 03:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? I havent found any button for sighting revisions in 0.8.3 yet. Any hint? --Krawi talk 08:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year to everyone. I just wanted to ask how things are going now that bugzilla:16278 is fixed? Best, --P. Birken (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't. Nobody is working on Huggle at the moment. -- Gurch (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, that's sad, there are quite a few people who use it. Hope that at sometime, you feel like working on Huggle again. All the best, --P. Birken (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are several issues using Huggle on DE (see [1]).----Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 11:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So bugzilla:16896 and bugzilla:16278 are now in place. This means that in theory, Flagging from Huggle could be possible using the API and furthermore, that Huggles usability could profit from flagged revisions by removing sighted edits from the list of edits to check. And of course, also profit from other vandal fighting tools having a similar feature. For example, http://toolserver.org/~apper/ipp/ uses this already, the VF-people are on it. It would be great if somebody could implement this for Huggle. --P. Birken (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you press the 'Revert and Warn' button, a drop-down menu comes up, with 'Vandalism', 'Spam', 'Personal Attacks', etc? I think a 'Patent Nonsense' feature should bve added. Or does everyone else think that the 'Editing Tests' function covers this? TopGearFreak 18:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it probably would cover it, it just depends. But I would definitely like to see a lot more options available, such as "self-revert" (which editing tests may also cover) and some more of the many over at WP:UWT. – Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 09:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er... if they reverted themselves, why would you be reverting them in the first place? -- Gurch (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there {{uw-selfrevert}} then? Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 17:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, and I think that is one of the more useless such templates. But I'm assuming that is intended to be issued to users after someone's seen they reverted their own edits, not used as a warning or associated with any reversion. So if it was available in Huggle at all it would be in the 'template messages' menu not the 'revert and warn' one. Though I personally think it is a solution looking for a problem; if they reverted the edit themselves what does it matter -- Gurch (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another add I think would be great is the warning for removal of CSD templates. – Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 04:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like quotes in difflinks need to be encoded, as seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=263135571 – Luna Santin (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting same issue. See here: [2]. --Chasingsol^(talk) 07:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Today I changed the block time for annons, and Huggle had an error when trying to update the configuration page. I changed the block time from 31 to 12 hours. This is what appeared:

ArgumentOutOfRangeException: startIndex cannot be larger than length of string.
Parameter name: startIndex
  at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
  at Huggle.Main.SetMenuText()
  at Huggle.Main.Configure()
  at Huggle.Requests.WriteConfigRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

--Racso (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

1. When I delete any page with Huggle, it always says that it "Failed to delete", but it works! Why does it say that deletion failed?
2. I think it would be nice that blocks appear in the history bar (where appears everything you do). It would be useful to confirm the block was made.

Salut! --Racso (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About nr1: Could it be that it tries to reload it afterwards, what obviously has to fail? I experienced something similiar when warning a user whose name had a "." at the end.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle crashed when I tried to revert any edits by 217.129.168.105 (talk). After it crashed, I opened it again, only to have it crash again when I tried to revert that user on the same page. See [3] for the Microsoft-generated error report. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:( -- Gurch (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• 1. NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Misc.FormatPageHtml(Page Page, String Text)
  at Huggle.Requests.BrowserRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

• 2. Bad syntax in this edit.

• 3. NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessContribs(String Result, User User)
  at Huggle.Requests.ContribsRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eswiki, 0.8.4. When blocking, it always sets "user can't edit his talk page", even if checkmark is off on the blockign dialog. There should be a configuration for this to set a default. -- m:drini 17:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like, on Filtered new pages, Huggle is not receiving any feed whatsoever. And on All new pages, it only lists talk pages. Meanwhile, the actual Special:NewPages was pretty active. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking changes to the IRC feed that were necessary in order to make non-kludgy patrolling and sighting of revisions feasible -- Gurch (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it fixable at some point? I've got some Huggle Feature ideas that would be nice for New Page Patrol, but if it's perma-broke, then no point. :) Arakunem^Talk 15:56, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously (cf. [4] and [5]) huggle does enable the “cannot edit own talk page” block option and disable the autoblock automatically — that should be turned off (i.e. corrected) as soon as possible. — Aitias // discussion 22:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the “account creation blocked” block option should be enabled automatically. — Aitias // discussion 22:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 threads above, and no reply as well. There's no way to disable or change default for talk page protection. This is a serious bug. -- m:drini 20:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is, and it was already done. I don't know why blocking was re-enabled in the first place -- Gurch (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I got this error message a few seconds ago

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Misc.FindString(String Source, String From, String To)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRc(String Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.RcApiRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Thought I'd leave word Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 06:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Identical message again tonight. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 06:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I change an option in Huggle [Queue → Manage Queues → Queue Options → Remove Edits After x Minutes], it does work. Wheni I close Huggle and then open it again, the "remove edits" option has gone back to the default 10 minutes. Is there a way to get around this, or is it a general glitch in 0.8.5.? Queenie ^Talk 17:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I try to undo a warning that I made on the talk page of a user, Huggle crashes. Not sure if this has been brought up before or if there's a problem with me, but I thought this was quite important to bring up. -download | sign! 03:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, when I try to cancel all pending actions it crashes too. I don't have a problem with undoing my edits once they're done though. Queenie ^Talk 19:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about undoing one of your own edits, but the problem with canceling pending edits is a known issue. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title says it all. Selecting a page to report to RFPP (in this case, Theramenes), Huggle crashes with the message "Huggle has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience." This happened in 0.8.4 as well as 0.8.5. Arakunem^Talk 00:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More and more often, I see editors doing what I call "paired vandalism", making an edit that is clearly vandalism and then reverting the article back to remove the vandalism. This can be seen at Articles of Confederation, where this edit changed the word "representatives" to "POOPHEADS", while the next edit changed it back to the status quo ante. Presumably, they are either getting a thrill from the temporary vandalism or perhaps they are printing out the page while vandalized to show someone else what they've done, but this is clearly vandalism. I would like to warn these editors, but I almost always get a message "Did not warn... user has not edited since their last warning". Is there any way to use Huggle to warn this type of vandal. Alansohn (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-selfrevert}} is what you're after here. This isn't anything new but has been with us since the dawn of the wiki; it's generally a case of a teacher spotting what the kids are doing and reverting it. – iridescent 13:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What fixes are in this? Versus22 _talk 22:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few small exception fixes and the fix that means it acctually works. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!}

0.9.0? Seems a big jump for what amounts to a patch. treelo _radda 00:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 22:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well seem as it is now the only version that works i decided to start the version numbering from a fresh. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 08:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can log in now (that's good) but I'm still getting exceptions when I click on anything in the queue. Any ideas? I even reinstalled .net to make sure that wasn't the problem.

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Queue.RemoveViewedEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Processing.DisplayEdit(Edit Edit, Boolean InBrowsingHistory, BrowserTab Tab, Boolean ChangeCurrentEdit)
  at Huggle.Main.QueueArea_MouseDown(Object s, MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnMouseDown(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.UserControl.OnMouseDown(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseDown(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.UserControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

--Rtphokie (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe HG can highlight edit summaries when they're made by users? As it is the text for it is similar font-wise to the edit box text, and it's also very close so it's easy to miss an edit summary. -- Mentifisto 16:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The remote server returned an error: (417) Expectation failed.

What does this mean? Renaissancee (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read above —Reedy 23:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I somehow managed to revert an edit on Wiktionary (diff), which strikes me as odd since I thought Huggle is supposed to be for Wikipedia only (plus, I don't have the rollback permission on Wiktionary). Could someone explain how this happened? Thanks,  ♪TempoDiValse♪  00:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did it here, and then it was transwikied over there. --Amalthea 01:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. That makes sense. Thanks,  ♪TempoDiValse♪  01:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I try to revert it says "Did not rever x:blocked". How can i fix this? Letsdrinktea (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just upgraded to v. 0.9.0 and my custom edit summaries do not show up in Huggle. I've added them via System -> Options and they appear in my configuration page, but not in the software. I had this problem with all of the versions post-0.7.12, which is why I did not upgrade until I had no choice. Any ideas? ... discospinster _talk 23:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took the rare step of requesting protection for a user talk page earlier today. (The page's owner is a Huggle user.) What Huggle should have displayed as ===={{lnt|User|WWGB}}==== on WP:RPP ended up being displayed as ===={{lnt|User talk|User talk:WWGB}}====, which creates a redlink to a nonexistent namespace. For archiving purposes, I made the correction manually here, after my request was granted. The Huggle edit is here. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

0.9.0 still has some "features" that came up with 0.8.3 and 0.8.4:

• it crashes when trying to revert own edits
• it adds every edited user talkpage to the watchlist
• it adds articles to the watchlist that were reverted seconds earlier
• Options/Templates: added templates are not featured in the main menu
• it likes to crash when trying to edit the "manage queues" window
• it seems that edits made in the "manage queues" window have to be done new every session
• it seems that about all changes in the "options menu" have to be done new every session

Anyway, thanks for a running version!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 02:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Points 2&3 above. You could try the following. Go to wikipedia in your webbrowser, and log in. Click on my preferences, then the watchlist tab. Unselect Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, and save. Does this solve these two points (I think that is what solved it for me). Martin451 (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there will are no other bugs than the fact it works from 0.8.4 to 0.9.0. This is why you can still find the bugs. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 07:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but they're still PITA. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same problems. No matter what I do, huggle keeps reverting my configuration page to the same acitnine settings, crashes whenever I click on the N, and runs slower than anartic molasses. Please fix the repeating bugs before I throw something at my computer!--Ipatrol (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I am just blind and I am overlooking something obvious but Huggle has a config tag "Admin", right? And you can choose to use admin functions? Then why does it still report to AIV instead of blocking? Is that option disabled? Regards SoWhy 22:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. It has been disabled by a very evil admin . — Aitias // discussion 22:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In other words they dont work :) ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 22:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I start Huggle, it says that it requires rollback.

My config file runs like this. Should it be working or what else do I need to do.

enable=true rollback=true require-rollback=true

RedSkunk^talk 23:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to request rollback, which is a technical ability. -- Mentifisto 09:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should at least be an option for HG to begin with level two, instead of level one and maybe continue with level four, instead going through all the levels (as in mostly, the user could possibly specify what HG uses when it warns automatically and where it begins from). Or at least manually choosing to warn using another level should be more readily accessible (not in a sub-sub-menu) and/or even maybe have two buttons, one that goes through all the levels like there is now and one that skips 2. This is mostly because I actually feel stupid welcoming and assuming total good faith (as a level 1 does) when a page was blanked with 'penis' on it or anything else that is just blatant vandalism. Even if at all times level 2 warnings are used to begin with I think it would be more appropriate than not (since most vandalism IS blatant). -- Mentifisto 10:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try the pull down menu besides the big red ball. There's a section called "Advanced..."--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I referred to when saying 'sub-sub-menu'. It isn't ideal from there, obviously. But ideally there's an option to choose from the warnings. -- Mentifisto 20:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think what I suggested should really be implemented. I'm sick of reverting blatant vandalism four times over until HG finally reports them (also, it's annoying when HG doesn't allow you to warn someone again if you've already warned them... I think if it's manual it should be allowed). There would be far less vandalism and more vandals blocked if HG used less warnings. -- Mentifisto 18:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have the time to go to the advanced settings, well... And I guess there's a reason for the warning levels in this form. You may propose dropping one or two of them...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 23:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat related to this, huggle appears to ignore non-huggle warnings. It somewhat annoying that an ip is given a level 3 warning (assuming bad faith),[6] and two minutes later is given a level 1 warning (assuming good faith).[7] Those diffs are just specific examples. I've seen this happen many times. This needs fixing in huggle. Rami R 20:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the time to watch recent changes but as a result of editing have quite a few pages on the watchlist and thus end up reverting vandals. It's not clear if Huggle only works with RC or if it's something that I could use when I spot vandalism via a page history diff. --Marc Kupper|talk 23:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're looking for something like WP:Twinkle.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 23:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Twinkle is now installed and am in the happy position of being locked, loaded, and not seeing any vandalism anywhere to try this out on. :-) Huggle only works with the recent changes list? --Marc Kupper|talk 00:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could use huggle for this, but you'll have to sign in with huggle, then type in the page you want, and then go there and revert it. Twinkle would be a much better option in this case, since you just have to go to the diff and simply revert by clicking on the suitable link provided. Chamal ^talk 00:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, basically, yes, it's for recent changes. Twinkle is more of a watchlist tool. Ehm, watch out for vandalism...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been getting multiple situations where a revert goes through but the warning does not, with the message "did not warn '99.99.99.99' badtoken" with different IP addresses and user names. Any explanation? Alansohn (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been having similar errors using Huggle, except that Huggle says that the user has not edited since the last warning. Other times, it will say it's warning the user (In the red text), only for the edit not to show up in the log. I am able to warn the user with the warn button, but then, apparently, (See my primary account's talk page) warns the user a second time, even though it isn't supposed to, and even though it only shows up once in the log... Sorry if this confuses anyone, but it's very strange... UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just restart Huggle when I get that badtoken error. Versus22 _talk 07:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This happened to me as well, and unfortionately didn't notice it for quite some time... *sigh* — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 22:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have access to a COI notification from the "warn user" button. Somethign that does a {{subst:uw-coi|primary article name}}. Similarly, it would be nice to have some copyright as a choice on the revert and warn button. Something that would prompt for the URL where the copyvio comes from, include that in the revert summary as well as tag the user with a {{subst:uw-copyright|Article|Additional text}}. Both of these happen more often than they should and it would be nice to be able to handle them in a consistent way from Huggle.--Rtphokie (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried running Huggle today, didnt work for me. I got this instead.

TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Huggle.Requests.Request' threw an exception.

  at Huggle.Requests.Request..ctor()
  at Huggle.LoginForm.OK_Click()
  at Huggle.LoginForm.Password_KeyDown(Object s, KeyEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnKeyDown(KeyEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ProcessKeyEventArgs(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ProcessKeyMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmKeyChar(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.TextBoxBase.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.TextBox.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

Could someone tell me Whats Wrong? M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 13:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using 0.9.0 or the 0.7.12 fixed version? Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded both, and neither worked. M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 21:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no good at interpreting these, but are you using Windows XP or later?--Res2216firestar 21:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows XP. M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 22:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I log in to Huggle, it logs in fine, but then the About screen comes up. I click OK and it just keeps coming back. Is there away to get around this or make it stop?--Navy blue84 (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although I did read the directions, I'm wondering if this is a bug or something I'm doing wrong. (Both are equally likely. *grin*)

Once in a while, when I'm reverting vandalism at the same moment another user is, this happens, where Huggle instead of reverting the two IP edits it was showing me on the screen reverts the reversion and one IP edit, leaving some vandalism in there. I assume this is caused by a small lag in huggle realizing things have changed, and is blindly reverting the last two edits. Is there some setting I've missed that will fix this, or is this a bug?

If it's a bug, any suggestions on how I can more easily alert myself to this? It's a pain to have to check the edit log at the bottom after every revert. Thanks!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. That would be a bug. I thought Gurch fixed this one up last year. You'll have to check with him. And no, there isn't an easy way to check... Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 03:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

InvalidOperationException: Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.

  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method)
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.RefreshData()
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.GotCount(RequestResult Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

That is what I got as an error report. --♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report. You wouldn't happen to know what you were doing when it came up, would you? Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 23:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to do a revert. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the Trim button under the Queue menu doesn't work in 9.0. ~SunDragon34 (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the whole bit is kinda broken right now :D - I'm looking at the code though. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 14:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to give each "experienced" user of Huggle at a certain time each a different queue of articles? (Or is Huggle doing that already?) It's not very productive with many users ganging up on the same article. -download | sign! 01:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, as that would mean communicating between users of huggle in real time, in the background. That gets complicated. Not to mention that running huggle != paying any attention. However, you can just purposely let some vandalism slip and let other users get it ... Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for WP:3RR violations by 218.102.129.86:

InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'Huggle.Requests.RequestResult' to type 'ThreeRevertRuleCheckResult'.

at Huggle.Report3rrForm.Find3rrDone(RequestResult Result)
at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()

at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

-- Boracay Bill (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.9.0 keeps crashing on me, and it's also very slow; here's the error message:

OutOfMemoryException: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.

 at System.String.InternalSubString(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
 at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
 at Huggle.Misc.StripHTML(String Text)
 at Huggle.Processing.GetChangesFromDiff(String Text)
 at Huggle.Processing.ProcessDiff(Edit Edit, String DiffText, BrowserTab Tab)
 at Huggle.Requests.DiffRequest.Done()
 at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
 at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Apparently you don't have enough RAM on your computer. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have 4gb of it, and according to the performance charts Huggle is using 1.16GB of it, and 4% of my processor. Would there be any substantial difference if I downgraded?cf38^talk 11:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, 4GB is a good amount of RAM. Not sure why that exception was thrown, it's for when you run out of RAM. Perhaps there's a limit on how much RAM a single application can use? I don't know :/

Also getting this message:

InvalidOperationException: Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.

  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method)
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.RefreshData()
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.GotCount(RequestResult Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Huggle is not enabled on your account,check user configuration page.How do I congif it.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

1) You need to have rollback rights (here , 2) you need to go here add the text : enable:true before downloading the latest version (0.9.0) and logging in. Any problems, you can post here, the helpdesk or my talk page. cf38^talk 11:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to make it so that when I automatically warn an anonymous user with a level four template, I can add a message saying something like:

User:Staffwaterboy/report

—Dromioofephesus (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a rather bad idea, for example, it should not be used with shared ip addresses, it should also be rather obvious to anyone doing vandalism-patrol. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I use 0.9.0, I can see a delete button for pages but can't see a block button; it only offers me to submit an AIV report. Am I missing something? It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 16:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, blocking is disabled due to myriad bugs in the current blocking code (both in huggle and the API here). Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 10:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sysop in es@wiki and I'm using Huggle 0.9.0 there. Since the last versions 0.8.2 and 0.9.0) every time I tried to send a template message to any user I get the same error:

  NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Main.TemplateItem_Click(Object Sender, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.RaiseEvent(Object key, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem.OnClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEventInteractive(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEvent(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

The template is not sent and Huggle can continue running, if I choose to. I'm running Windows XP SP3 and Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1. Can anyone help me?. Thank you all in advance. KveD (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if these are bugs, but I've encountered the following issues while using Huggle:

1. Huggle usually prints "alreadyrolled" in the edit log when it tries to revert an edit that has already been reverted by someone else. However, it sometimes says "The content of the target revision is identical to that of the current revision" (which would more appropriately describe a null edit), and at other times, it displays nothing at all.
2. The dialog box that asks whether I want to revert an edit by a whitelisted user sometimes appears more than once.

You might want to look into these issues. --Ixfd64 (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. It keeps not remembering my check in the following Checkbox:

• Menu "System"
• Menu item "Options..."
• Tab "Reverting"
• Checkbox "After reverting, move to next edit in the queue"

I fixed this auto-advancing behavior with this edit, but the fact that huggle could not do so by itself is troubling.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've encountered another problem with Huggle. It seems Huggle sometimes failes to recognize that I am an administrator. For example, it automatically reported 202.72.175.44 instead of asking whether I want to block them.

This was version 0.9.0, by the way. --Ixfd64 (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see section #Admin_functions.3F above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a first-time user, and it would be great if there was a button that would take you back to the last screen you saw. A couple of times, I think there was a new revision to that after I had clicked "Next". Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 01:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I feel stupid: I just saw the button. Thanks anyway! Genius101^Guestbook 01:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, another question: Why do my Huggle edits not show up in my contributions list, or on an edit counter? Just wondering... Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 01:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I feel even stupider: they just showed up. I'm going to stop asking questions now. Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 13:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessContribs(String Result, User User)
  at Huggle.Requests.ContribsRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Another error: ArgumentOutOfRangeException: startIndex cannot be larger than length of string. Parameter name: startIndex

  at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessNewEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Irc.ProcessIrcEdit(Object EditObject)

I hust had an incident where I revert&warned on a page, and Huggle reverted a different page. It looked like Huggle was in the process of processing a queued page for display when I tried to revert+warn on the page which was displayed at the time, and Huggle reverted the page it was processing rather than the one displayed. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is the same issue, but I have had two instances where Huggle deleted the wrong page. The second time (these were on different days) I investigated and found that it was deleting the latest page in my viewing sequence, despite the "delete" button being clicked while viewing the actual page I wanted to delete. To illustrate:

• Viewed a page in the "speedy delete" queue
• Clicked on the link on that page to go to the AfD page concerning it
• Went back (using left arrow in Huggle) to the page up for deletion, clicked on "delete"
• Huggle deleted the AfD page instead

Thoughts? --Ckatz^chat_spy 02:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted an edit where someone had changed one letter of a word, and when I went back to look was surprised I had accused them of vandalism. I suppose it is vandalism once they have done something like that 3 times, but given that it cites the actual edit, it looks like a ridiculously harsh warning in this case. (Had I done it manually, I would not have found it worthwhile to even notify them, honestly).

This brings me to another question: Is it necesary to warn along with reverting a minor thing like this? Or should it depend on the history? --Susan118 (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's your decision. You have both a button (and hotkey) to revert and warn, and one to only revert. --Amalthea 17:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that it is always good to let someone know why you reverted their edits. But maybe if HG automatically escalates warnings, that's not always a good policy to follow. (Or maybe in the case I mentioned, I could have just reverted and then manually posted a message.) --Susan118 (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to filter edits to only show mainspace edits? GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 18:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You simply need to go to Queue --> Manage Queues --> Page Title. -download | sign! 23:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm reporting a bug instead of Tomatejc@eswiki. The code is the following:

 NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Main.TemplateItem_Click(Object Sender, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.RaiseEvent(Object key, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem.OnClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEventInteractive(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEvent(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

That code appears when he tries to warn a user with personal templates, also he can't use "revert and warn" or simply "warn". Cheers. --Dferg ^{(w:en: - w:es:)} 19:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm from the german wikipedia, where flagged revisions are active. Huggle is used by some of our recent changes patrollers (yay to Huggle :-)). Therefore it would be really great if you could include interaction with flagged revisions as an option. Reverts are completely fine and will be flagged automatically, the feature we would like to have is the possibility to flag good edits as sighted from the Huggle interface. As it is now, all the checking of good edits has to be done twice if the RC-patroller uses huggle. The other supported project that uses flagged revisions is the ru.WP, so they would be happy as well. Any chance? Best, --P. Birken (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe there's a button for sighting revisions in version 0.8.3 (the latest released version). Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 03:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? I havent found any button for sighting revisions in 0.8.3 yet. Any hint? --Krawi talk 08:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year to everyone. I just wanted to ask how things are going now that bugzilla:16278 is fixed? Best, --P. Birken (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't. Nobody is working on Huggle at the moment. -- Gurch (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mh, that's sad, there are quite a few people who use it. Hope that at sometime, you feel like working on Huggle again. All the best, --P. Birken (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are several issues using Huggle on DE (see [8]).----Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 11:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So bugzilla:16896 and bugzilla:16278 are now in place. This means that in theory, Flagging from Huggle could be possible using the API and furthermore, that Huggles usability could profit from flagged revisions by removing sighted edits from the list of edits to check. And of course, also profit from other vandal fighting tools having a similar feature. For example, http://toolserver.org/~apper/ipp/ uses this already, the VF-people are on it. It would be great if somebody could implement this for Huggle. --P. Birken (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you press the 'Revert and Warn' button, a drop-down menu comes up, with 'Vandalism', 'Spam', 'Personal Attacks', etc? I think a 'Patent Nonsense' feature should bve added. Or does everyone else think that the 'Editing Tests' function covers this? TopGearFreak 18:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it probably would cover it, it just depends. But I would definitely like to see a lot more options available, such as "self-revert" (which editing tests may also cover) and some more of the many over at WP:UWT. – Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 09:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er... if they reverted themselves, why would you be reverting them in the first place? -- Gurch (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there {{uw-selfrevert}} then? Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 17:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, and I think that is one of the more useless such templates. But I'm assuming that is intended to be issued to users after someone's seen they reverted their own edits, not used as a warning or associated with any reversion. So if it was available in Huggle at all it would be in the 'template messages' menu not the 'revert and warn' one. Though I personally think it is a solution looking for a problem; if they reverted the edit themselves what does it matter -- Gurch (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another add I think would be great is the warning for removal of CSD templates. – Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 04:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like quotes in difflinks need to be encoded, as seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&oldid=263135571 – Luna Santin (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting same issue. See here: [9]. --Chasingsol^(talk) 07:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Today I changed the block time for annons, and Huggle had an error when trying to update the configuration page. I changed the block time from 31 to 12 hours. This is what appeared:

ArgumentOutOfRangeException: startIndex cannot be larger than length of string.
Parameter name: startIndex
  at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
  at Huggle.Main.SetMenuText()
  at Huggle.Main.Configure()
  at Huggle.Requests.WriteConfigRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

--Racso (talk) 04:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

1. When I delete any page with Huggle, it always says that it "Failed to delete", but it works! Why does it say that deletion failed?
2. I think it would be nice that blocks appear in the history bar (where appears everything you do). It would be useful to confirm the block was made.

Salut! --Racso (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About nr1: Could it be that it tries to reload it afterwards, what obviously has to fail? I experienced something similiar when warning a user whose name had a "." at the end.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle crashed when I tried to revert any edits by 217.129.168.105 (talk). After it crashed, I opened it again, only to have it crash again when I tried to revert that user on the same page. See [10] for the Microsoft-generated error report. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:( -- Gurch (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• 1. NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Misc.FormatPageHtml(Page Page, String Text)
  at Huggle.Requests.BrowserRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

• 2. Bad syntax in this edit.

• 3. NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessContribs(String Result, User User)
  at Huggle.Requests.ContribsRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eswiki, 0.8.4. When blocking, it always sets "user can't edit his talk page", even if checkmark is off on the blockign dialog. There should be a configuration for this to set a default. -- m:drini 17:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like, on Filtered new pages, Huggle is not receiving any feed whatsoever. And on All new pages, it only lists talk pages. Meanwhile, the actual Special:NewPages was pretty active. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking changes to the IRC feed that were necessary in order to make non-kludgy patrolling and sighting of revisions feasible -- Gurch (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it fixable at some point? I've got some Huggle Feature ideas that would be nice for New Page Patrol, but if it's perma-broke, then no point. :) Arakunem^Talk 15:56, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously (cf. [11] and [12]) huggle does enable the “cannot edit own talk page” block option and disable the autoblock automatically — that should be turned off (i.e. corrected) as soon as possible. — Aitias // discussion 22:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the “account creation blocked” block option should be enabled automatically. — Aitias // discussion 22:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 threads above, and no reply as well. There's no way to disable or change default for talk page protection. This is a serious bug. -- m:drini 20:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is, and it was already done. I don't know why blocking was re-enabled in the first place -- Gurch (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea what it means, but I got this error message a few seconds ago

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Misc.FindString(String Source, String From, String To)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRc(String Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.RcApiRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Thought I'd leave word Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 06:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Identical message again tonight. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 06:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I change an option in Huggle [Queue → Manage Queues → Queue Options → Remove Edits After x Minutes], it does work. Wheni I close Huggle and then open it again, the "remove edits" option has gone back to the default 10 minutes. Is there a way to get around this, or is it a general glitch in 0.8.5.? Queenie ^Talk 17:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I try to undo a warning that I made on the talk page of a user, Huggle crashes. Not sure if this has been brought up before or if there's a problem with me, but I thought this was quite important to bring up. -download | sign! 03:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, when I try to cancel all pending actions it crashes too. I don't have a problem with undoing my edits once they're done though. Queenie ^Talk 19:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about undoing one of your own edits, but the problem with canceling pending edits is a known issue. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title says it all. Selecting a page to report to RFPP (in this case, Theramenes), Huggle crashes with the message "Huggle has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience." This happened in 0.8.4 as well as 0.8.5. Arakunem^Talk 00:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More and more often, I see editors doing what I call "paired vandalism", making an edit that is clearly vandalism and then reverting the article back to remove the vandalism. This can be seen at Articles of Confederation, where this edit changed the word "representatives" to "POOPHEADS", while the next edit changed it back to the status quo ante. Presumably, they are either getting a thrill from the temporary vandalism or perhaps they are printing out the page while vandalized to show someone else what they've done, but this is clearly vandalism. I would like to warn these editors, but I almost always get a message "Did not warn... user has not edited since their last warning". Is there any way to use Huggle to warn this type of vandal. Alansohn (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-selfrevert}} is what you're after here. This isn't anything new but has been with us since the dawn of the wiki; it's generally a case of a teacher spotting what the kids are doing and reverting it. – iridescent 13:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What fixes are in this? Versus22 _talk 22:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few small exception fixes and the fix that means it acctually works. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!}

0.9.0? Seems a big jump for what amounts to a patch. treelo _radda 00:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 22:12, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well seem as it is now the only version that works i decided to start the version numbering from a fresh. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 08:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can log in now (that's good) but I'm still getting exceptions when I click on anything in the queue. Any ideas? I even reinstalled .net to make sure that wasn't the problem.

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Queue.RemoveViewedEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Processing.DisplayEdit(Edit Edit, Boolean InBrowsingHistory, BrowserTab Tab, Boolean ChangeCurrentEdit)
  at Huggle.Main.QueueArea_MouseDown(Object s, MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnMouseDown(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.UserControl.OnMouseDown(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseDown(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ContainerControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.UserControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

--Rtphokie (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe HG can highlight edit summaries when they're made by users? As it is the text for it is similar font-wise to the edit box text, and it's also very close so it's easy to miss an edit summary. -- Mentifisto 16:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The remote server returned an error: (417) Expectation failed.

What does this mean? Renaissancee (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read above —Reedy 23:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I somehow managed to revert an edit on Wiktionary (diff), which strikes me as odd since I thought Huggle is supposed to be for Wikipedia only (plus, I don't have the rollback permission on Wiktionary). Could someone explain how this happened? Thanks,  ♪TempoDiValse♪  00:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did it here, and then it was transwikied over there. --Amalthea 01:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. That makes sense. Thanks,  ♪TempoDiValse♪  01:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I try to revert it says "Did not rever x:blocked". How can i fix this? Letsdrinktea (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just upgraded to v. 0.9.0 and my custom edit summaries do not show up in Huggle. I've added them via System -> Options and they appear in my configuration page, but not in the software. I had this problem with all of the versions post-0.7.12, which is why I did not upgrade until I had no choice. Any ideas? ... discospinster _talk 23:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I took the rare step of requesting protection for a user talk page earlier today. (The page's owner is a Huggle user.) What Huggle should have displayed as ===={{lnt|User|WWGB}}==== on WP:RPP ended up being displayed as ===={{lnt|User talk|User talk:WWGB}}====, which creates a redlink to a nonexistent namespace. For archiving purposes, I made the correction manually here, after my request was granted. The Huggle edit is here. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

0.9.0 still has some "features" that came up with 0.8.3 and 0.8.4:

• it crashes when trying to revert own edits
• it adds every edited user talkpage to the watchlist
• it adds articles to the watchlist that were reverted seconds earlier
• Options/Templates: added templates are not featured in the main menu
• it likes to crash when trying to edit the "manage queues" window
• it seems that edits made in the "manage queues" window have to be done new every session
• it seems that about all changes in the "options menu" have to be done new every session

Anyway, thanks for a running version!--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 02:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Points 2&3 above. You could try the following. Go to wikipedia in your webbrowser, and log in. Click on my preferences, then the watchlist tab. Unselect Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, and save. Does this solve these two points (I think that is what solved it for me). Martin451 (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there will are no other bugs than the fact it works from 0.8.4 to 0.9.0. This is why you can still find the bugs. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 07:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but they're still PITA. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 21:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same problems. No matter what I do, huggle keeps reverting my configuration page to the same acitnine settings, crashes whenever I click on the N, and runs slower than anartic molasses. Please fix the repeating bugs before I throw something at my computer!--Ipatrol (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I am just blind and I am overlooking something obvious but Huggle has a config tag "Admin", right? And you can choose to use admin functions? Then why does it still report to AIV instead of blocking? Is that option disabled? Regards SoWhy 22:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. It has been disabled by a very evil admin . — Aitias // discussion 22:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In other words they dont work :) ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 22:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I start Huggle, it says that it requires rollback.

My config file runs like this. Should it be working or what else do I need to do.

enable=true rollback=true require-rollback=true

RedSkunk^talk 23:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to request rollback, which is a technical ability. -- Mentifisto 09:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should at least be an option for HG to begin with level two, instead of level one and maybe continue with level four, instead going through all the levels (as in mostly, the user could possibly specify what HG uses when it warns automatically and where it begins from). Or at least manually choosing to warn using another level should be more readily accessible (not in a sub-sub-menu) and/or even maybe have two buttons, one that goes through all the levels like there is now and one that skips 2. This is mostly because I actually feel stupid welcoming and assuming total good faith (as a level 1 does) when a page was blanked with 'penis' on it or anything else that is just blatant vandalism. Even if at all times level 2 warnings are used to begin with I think it would be more appropriate than not (since most vandalism IS blatant). -- Mentifisto 10:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try the pull down menu besides the big red ball. There's a section called "Advanced..."--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 22:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I referred to when saying 'sub-sub-menu'. It isn't ideal from there, obviously. But ideally there's an option to choose from the warnings. -- Mentifisto 20:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think what I suggested should really be implemented. I'm sick of reverting blatant vandalism four times over until HG finally reports them (also, it's annoying when HG doesn't allow you to warn someone again if you've already warned them... I think if it's manual it should be allowed). There would be far less vandalism and more vandals blocked if HG used less warnings. -- Mentifisto 18:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have the time to go to the advanced settings, well... And I guess there's a reason for the warning levels in this form. You may propose dropping one or two of them...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 23:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat related to this, huggle appears to ignore non-huggle warnings. It somewhat annoying that an ip is given a level 3 warning (assuming bad faith),[13] and two minutes later is given a level 1 warning (assuming good faith).[14] Those diffs are just specific examples. I've seen this happen many times. This needs fixing in huggle. Rami R 20:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the time to watch recent changes but as a result of editing have quite a few pages on the watchlist and thus end up reverting vandals. It's not clear if Huggle only works with RC or if it's something that I could use when I spot vandalism via a page history diff. --Marc Kupper|talk 23:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're looking for something like WP:Twinkle.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 23:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Twinkle is now installed and am in the happy position of being locked, loaded, and not seeing any vandalism anywhere to try this out on. :-) Huggle only works with the recent changes list? --Marc Kupper|talk 00:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could use huggle for this, but you'll have to sign in with huggle, then type in the page you want, and then go there and revert it. Twinkle would be a much better option in this case, since you just have to go to the diff and simply revert by clicking on the suitable link provided. Chamal ^talk 00:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, basically, yes, it's for recent changes. Twinkle is more of a watchlist tool. Ehm, watch out for vandalism...--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been getting multiple situations where a revert goes through but the warning does not, with the message "did not warn '99.99.99.99' badtoken" with different IP addresses and user names. Any explanation? Alansohn (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been having similar errors using Huggle, except that Huggle says that the user has not edited since the last warning. Other times, it will say it's warning the user (In the red text), only for the edit not to show up in the log. I am able to warn the user with the warn button, but then, apparently, (See my primary account's talk page) warns the user a second time, even though it isn't supposed to, and even though it only shows up once in the log... Sorry if this confuses anyone, but it's very strange... UntilItSleeps PublicPC 20:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just restart Huggle when I get that badtoken error. Versus22 _talk 07:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This happened to me as well, and unfortionately didn't notice it for quite some time... *sigh* — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 22:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have access to a COI notification from the "warn user" button. Somethign that does a {{subst:uw-coi|primary article name}}. Similarly, it would be nice to have some copyright as a choice on the revert and warn button. Something that would prompt for the URL where the copyvio comes from, include that in the revert summary as well as tag the user with a {{subst:uw-copyright|Article|Additional text}}. Both of these happen more often than they should and it would be nice to be able to handle them in a consistent way from Huggle.--Rtphokie (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried running Huggle today, didnt work for me. I got this instead.

TypeInitializationException: The type initializer for 'Huggle.Requests.Request' threw an exception.

  at Huggle.Requests.Request..ctor()
  at Huggle.LoginForm.OK_Click()
  at Huggle.LoginForm.Password_KeyDown(Object s, KeyEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnKeyDown(KeyEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ProcessKeyEventArgs(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ProcessKeyMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmKeyChar(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.TextBoxBase.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.TextBox.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

Could someone tell me Whats Wrong? M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 13:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you using 0.9.0 or the 0.7.12 fixed version? Inferno, Lord of Penguins 19:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded both, and neither worked. M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 21:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no good at interpreting these, but are you using Windows XP or later?--Res2216firestar 21:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows XP. M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 22:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I log in to Huggle, it logs in fine, but then the About screen comes up. I click OK and it just keeps coming back. Is there away to get around this or make it stop?--Navy blue84 (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although I did read the directions, I'm wondering if this is a bug or something I'm doing wrong. (Both are equally likely. *grin*)

Once in a while, when I'm reverting vandalism at the same moment another user is, this happens, where Huggle instead of reverting the two IP edits it was showing me on the screen reverts the reversion and one IP edit, leaving some vandalism in there. I assume this is caused by a small lag in huggle realizing things have changed, and is blindly reverting the last two edits. Is there some setting I've missed that will fix this, or is this a bug?

If it's a bug, any suggestions on how I can more easily alert myself to this? It's a pain to have to check the edit log at the bottom after every revert. Thanks!--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. That would be a bug. I thought Gurch fixed this one up last year. You'll have to check with him. And no, there isn't an easy way to check... Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 03:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

InvalidOperationException: Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.

  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method)
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.RefreshData()
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.GotCount(RequestResult Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

That is what I got as an error report. --♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report. You wouldn't happen to know what you were doing when it came up, would you? Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 23:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to do a revert. ♪♫The New Mikemoral^talk_contribs 23:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the Trim button under the Queue menu doesn't work in 9.0. ~SunDragon34 (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the whole bit is kinda broken right now :D - I'm looking at the code though. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 14:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to give each "experienced" user of Huggle at a certain time each a different queue of articles? (Or is Huggle doing that already?) It's not very productive with many users ganging up on the same article. -download | sign! 01:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, as that would mean communicating between users of huggle in real time, in the background. That gets complicated. Not to mention that running huggle != paying any attention. However, you can just purposely let some vandalism slip and let other users get it ... Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for WP:3RR violations by 218.102.129.86:

InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'Huggle.Requests.RequestResult' to type 'ThreeRevertRuleCheckResult'.

at Huggle.Report3rrForm.Find3rrDone(RequestResult Result)
at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()

at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

-- Boracay Bill (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.9.0 keeps crashing on me, and it's also very slow; here's the error message:

OutOfMemoryException: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.

 at System.String.InternalSubString(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
 at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
 at Huggle.Misc.StripHTML(String Text)
 at Huggle.Processing.GetChangesFromDiff(String Text)
 at Huggle.Processing.ProcessDiff(Edit Edit, String DiffText, BrowserTab Tab)
 at Huggle.Requests.DiffRequest.Done()
 at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
 at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Apparently you don't have enough RAM on your computer. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have 4gb of it, and according to the performance charts Huggle is using 1.16GB of it, and 4% of my processor. Would there be any substantial difference if I downgraded?cf38^talk 11:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, 4GB is a good amount of RAM. Not sure why that exception was thrown, it's for when you run out of RAM. Perhaps there's a limit on how much RAM a single application can use? I don't know :/

Also getting this message:

InvalidOperationException: Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.

  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method)
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.RefreshData()
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.GotCount(RequestResult Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Huggle is not enabled on your account,check user configuration page.How do I congif it.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

1) You need to have rollback rights (here , 2) you need to go here add the text : enable:true before downloading the latest version (0.9.0) and logging in. Any problems, you can post here, the helpdesk or my talk page. cf38^talk 11:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to make it so that when I automatically warn an anonymous user with a level four template, I can add a message saying something like:

User:Staffwaterboy/report

—Dromioofephesus (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's a rather bad idea, for example, it should not be used with shared ip addresses, it should also be rather obvious to anyone doing vandalism-patrol. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I use 0.9.0, I can see a delete button for pages but can't see a block button; it only offers me to submit an AIV report. Am I missing something? It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 16:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, blocking is disabled due to myriad bugs in the current blocking code (both in huggle and the API here). Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 10:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sysop in es@wiki and I'm using Huggle 0.9.0 there. Since the last versions 0.8.2 and 0.9.0) every time I tried to send a template message to any user I get the same error:

  NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Main.TemplateItem_Click(Object Sender, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.RaiseEvent(Object key, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem.OnClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEventInteractive(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEvent(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

The template is not sent and Huggle can continue running, if I choose to. I'm running Windows XP SP3 and Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1. Can anyone help me?. Thank you all in advance. KveD (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if these are bugs, but I've encountered the following issues while using Huggle:

1. Huggle usually prints "alreadyrolled" in the edit log when it tries to revert an edit that has already been reverted by someone else. However, it sometimes says "The content of the target revision is identical to that of the current revision" (which would more appropriately describe a null edit), and at other times, it displays nothing at all.
2. The dialog box that asks whether I want to revert an edit by a whitelisted user sometimes appears more than once.

You might want to look into these issues. --Ixfd64 (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. It keeps not remembering my check in the following Checkbox:

• Menu "System"
• Menu item "Options..."
• Tab "Reverting"
• Checkbox "After reverting, move to next edit in the queue"

I fixed this auto-advancing behavior with this edit, but the fact that huggle could not do so by itself is troubling.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've encountered another problem with Huggle. It seems Huggle sometimes failes to recognize that I am an administrator. For example, it automatically reported 202.72.175.44 instead of asking whether I want to block them.

This was version 0.9.0, by the way. --Ixfd64 (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see section #Admin_functions.3F above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a first-time user, and it would be great if there was a button that would take you back to the last screen you saw. A couple of times, I think there was a new revision to that after I had clicked "Next". Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 01:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I feel stupid: I just saw the button. Thanks anyway! Genius101^Guestbook 01:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, another question: Why do my Huggle edits not show up in my contributions list, or on an edit counter? Just wondering... Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 01:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I feel even stupider: they just showed up. I'm going to stop asking questions now. Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 13:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessContribs(String Result, User User)
  at Huggle.Requests.ContribsRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

Another error: ArgumentOutOfRangeException: startIndex cannot be larger than length of string. Parameter name: startIndex

  at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessNewEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Irc.ProcessIrcEdit(Object EditObject)

I hust had an incident where I revert&warned on a page, and Huggle reverted a different page. It looked like Huggle was in the process of processing a queued page for display when I tried to revert+warn on the page which was displayed at the time, and Huggle reverted the page it was processing rather than the one displayed. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is the same issue, but I have had two instances where Huggle deleted the wrong page. The second time (these were on different days) I investigated and found that it was deleting the latest page in my viewing sequence, despite the "delete" button being clicked while viewing the actual page I wanted to delete. To illustrate:

• Viewed a page in the "speedy delete" queue
• Clicked on the link on that page to go to the AfD page concerning it
• Went back (using left arrow in Huggle) to the page up for deletion, clicked on "delete"
• Huggle deleted the AfD page instead

Thoughts? --Ckatz^chat_spy 02:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted an edit where someone had changed one letter of a word, and when I went back to look was surprised I had accused them of vandalism. I suppose it is vandalism once they have done something like that 3 times, but given that it cites the actual edit, it looks like a ridiculously harsh warning in this case. (Had I done it manually, I would not have found it worthwhile to even notify them, honestly).

This brings me to another question: Is it necesary to warn along with reverting a minor thing like this? Or should it depend on the history? --Susan118 (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's your decision. You have both a button (and hotkey) to revert and warn, and one to only revert. --Amalthea 17:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that it is always good to let someone know why you reverted their edits. But maybe if HG automatically escalates warnings, that's not always a good policy to follow. (Or maybe in the case I mentioned, I could have just reverted and then manually posted a message.) --Susan118 (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to filter edits to only show mainspace edits? GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 18:23, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You simply need to go to Queue --> Manage Queues --> Page Title. -download | sign! 23:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm reporting a bug instead of Tomatejc@eswiki. The code is the following:

 NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
  at Huggle.Main.TemplateItem_Click(Object Sender, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.RaiseEvent(Object key, EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem.OnClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleClick(EventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.HandleMouseUp(MouseEventArgs e)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEventInteractive(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem.FireEvent(EventArgs e, ToolStripItemEventType met)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mea)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollableControl.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDown.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
  at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)

That code appears when he tries to warn a user with personal templates, also he can't use "revert and warn" or simply "warn". Cheers. --Dferg ^{(w:en: - w:es:)} 19:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]