User talk:Turgan/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Please add new sections to the bottom of this page, and new messages to the bottoms of their sections. Thanks.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Smith Ranch-Highland, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wise-uranium.org/umopwy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Tag removed, as there was no violation. Turgan (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

?? Hey a seskatacha person tagging mining cat pages - ahhh a fellow cat tagger - hey there are not many of us around - few understand us and even fewer stay the trip so to speak. some vets of wikipedia dont even cat their new pages. so gday from down under (dont let the name get ya) and welcome on board SatuSuro 02:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. Turgan (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I notice you are member of WP: Sask. Well, I am hereby inviting you to WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods. If you decide to join, we look forward to welcoming to you to the project. Mr. C.C. (talk) 01:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, for the mistake. I ment killoton of uranium (in some countries a ',' is used as decimal point, so that confused me). But still, the conversion is incorrect. 1 ton is 1000 kilo and 1 kilo is more than 2 pounds. So you should have more pounds than kilos IMHO Lkruijsw (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, again. I see now that it is not a metric ton. Weird, converting a non-metric value to another non-metric value Lkruijsw (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Me again, numbers are not correct. A non-metric ton is almost equal to a metric ton. So, someone made the conversion wrong. Lkruijsw (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I checked the report.

486,500 tonnes grading 17.38%!!!!

280,000 tonnes grading 26.33%!!!!

So, except for the factor 1000 (sorry, for that), my number was correct.

22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Do, you agree in changing:

766,500 tonnes U3O8 at an average grade of 20.66%

into

766,500 tonnes grading 20.66% U3O8 at average

? (same wording as in the report)

Because, 766,500 tonnes U3O8 is incorrect, you have 766,500 uranium ore, not U3O8. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lkruijsw (talk • contribs) 23:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I've placed colons in the category links on User:Turgan/Sandbox2 so the page doesn't show up on the category pages. When you are ready to go live (move to mainspace), simply remove the colons. Vsmith (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

That is a good tip to remember. Thank you. Turgan ^Talk 17:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Hiya. I've approved your request. Please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me for help. Please remember the tool is only to remove obvious vandalism. Many thanks. Pedro :  Chat  09:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Spanish American Mine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish American Mine. Thank you. Johnfos (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I have responded there. Turgan ^Talk 00:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I noticed you placed a message tag on the top of the article I just created. Why did you do this?--I Really Love You, And I Mean You (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I reviewed your artical as part of the New Page patrol program. I placed the notability tag on your article when I reviewed it to point out an area that needed to be addressed to aviod deletion of your article. This is another way of helping editors improve thier additions. I see this has been addressed, so the tag can be removed. The AfD tag someone else added, however, can not be removed yet. Please feel free to comment on that discussion as well. Turgan ^Talk 10:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The name of Northern Cyprus was legally changed to North Cyprus and all relevant changes are gradually performed about this (Like http://www.northcyprus.com , http://www.northcyprus.org etc. ) Unfortunately, there is no BOT to make all the necessary changes in Wikipedia at once. So, I change the necessary shifting one by one. Then, I redirect all "Northern"s to "North"s. Thx a lot for your sensitivity. Cheapfriends (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

You are very right: Your suggestion is very nice and practical. Unfortunately, admins of Wikipedia are so slow that they lag behind the legal changes. There are two ways as you mentioned:

• 1: MOVE of the old page to the new name, and delete the old one.
• 2: RECREATE the old page and then REDIRECT the old page to NEW page or delete the old one completely.

I mentioned this issue in [[1]]. The users who are aware of the change supported the 2nd way since the number of articles on NC is not so high and changes can be done very fast.

If the page is moved, the old page automatically redirects to the new name. Once your account has been active for a few days, you can do the move yourself. An admin is not required for a page move. Just suggesting ways that might be a bit easier on you, and will maintain the integrity of the article. Turgan ^Talk 14:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thx a lot for your interest to the issue. Cheapfriends (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, I was patrolling new pages, and they kind of stood out. Turgan ^Talk 14:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice word: "stand out". I look at its meaning in [[2]]. If you are in trouble about a Turkish phrase, don't hesitate to call me :) Cheapfriends (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I started a discussion about changing Category:Sub-surface mining to Category:Underground mining, I wanted to see what the thoughts of other participents of WikiProject Mining were.--kelapstick (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

This is my own talk page and I can blank it if I choose. Please do not revert another user's talk page as you do not have the jurisdiction to do so.79.66.16.15 (talk) 04:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

As long as you actually read the warnings... I have seen too many warnings removed by anonymous editors for the wrong reason and may have jumped the gun. I will do what I have to while respecting the fact that it is your page. I apologize for the inconvenience. Turgan ^Talk 05:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I have sended you an edit warring and you have removed it PLUS you have pasted it on my own page!! 89.55.208.132 (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I think you are getting editors and conversations mixed up. Please do not confuse me with user .79.66.16.15 Turgan ^Talk 05:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Could be, yes... but that's because I'm new to Wikipedia, but still, this person has removed everything from his talking page into mine! I don't think that this is right. This person is experienced and I am not... but this doesn't make him being in the right! Some of you guys should really watch out for what he is doing on a specific article called Marilyn. This is a bands entry. Please do help me out with this!! 89.55.208.132 (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar, glad to see it getting put to use (and that someone noticed the category sorting I had been attempting). I made it when I saw Theseeker4 doing some major overhaul work on mining, eliminating the US-centricity and what not, seemed like a good fit for the project (and a good opportunity for me to test out Paint.net). I see by your talk page you are from Nova Scotia, my wife is from Pictou County, we get back there fairly frequently (although not as frequent as I would like). Hope you are enjoying Australia, I am hoping to get there some time.--kelapstick (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

The star turned out very well. Hopefully it gets some good use. Yes, I am originally from the Annapolis Valley, however my parents are both from Pictou County. It is a very small world. Nova Scotia is a nice province. I try to get back there when I can, however it is usually in the winter. Turgan ^Talk 00:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Turgan, I saw your comment on the Anaconda move discussion, when we have to move pages once we decide on naming conventions they qualify for speedy deletion under G6 to make way for uncontroversial moves (Template:Db-g6). For example, to move Anaconda Copper to Anaconda Copper Mining Company, on Anaconda Copper Mining Company put {{db-move|Anaconda Copper|As per discussion at [[Talk:Anaconda Copper#Requested move]]}}, hope this helps.--kelapstick (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That is good to know. I never checked the CSD criteria to see if there was one that will cover this. I have come across several others that are in the same situation. Turgan ^Talk 12:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Turgan

Thanks for the message. I tried looking for the 3401 onwards page, and so on but couldn't see it. It was getting a bit late and I must have missed it completely. Anyhow, 3301 to 3500 was all I could see on my screen, I swear! So I ploughed ('plowed') on regardless, although you may have noticed I have put the proper shipping names in bold and any ancillary information remains in whatever you call not bold :)

I plan to go through the whole of the list to check for errors and do the same 'bold' thing as my current additions, along with a footnote explaining why. Then I'll hypertext it up a bit more, ideally linking to Hazard Data Sheet-type information. Unless the UN come and tell me off first...

May I ask, what is your interest in UN numbers? I thought I was the world's only chemical tanker spotter...

Tekmeme...*^tm

Edit: Aha... mining?

PS I looked at your link and the information there is incomplete. I propose that my edit replace the incomplete page and be divided up into a replacement 3301 to 3400 page and, in agreement with your suggestion, a separate page for numbers 3401 onwards. I may need a little help in achieving this...

Tekmeme (talk) 23:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I came acoss the page while patrolling new pages. If you need any help with the changes, let me know ... Turgan ^Talk 04:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I saw your note about advertisement on Mineral exploration. Same editor did this on mining, I was more concerned with the copyright violation (as opposed to promotional content), as it was "cut and pasted" from the source. I have rewritten it now to remove that issue, but I am unsure if we should use that report as an RS for defining major, intermediate and junior mining companies (as it is just one companies opinion). Might be good for now, but if we find something better in the future it would be worth adjusting. Cheers --kelapstick (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. I understand where you are coming but I have to disagree with you. First, the NYT has two obit sections, one for paid obits and one for non-paid (i.e. notable people) obits. The NYT obit for Polly Lauder Tunney comes from the non-paid independent obit section. Jack Cavanaugh is one of the nyt's major sports journalists. He doesn't write paid obits. The second obit was done by the Associated Press which does not write paid obits. These are independent sources. This isn't a case of a family putting in a death announcement. This is a journalist reporting on the life and death of a notable person. Singingdaisies (talk) 13:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. I however still question notability when the only thing I can find is an obituary. If they are truely notable, other than being rich and married to a notable person, then there should be be other sources out there. My point still stands. Turgan ^Talk 13:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Just go to the NYT archives, Chicago Tribune archives, and womens magazines back in the 1920s and 1930s. Any little thing that happened to her was in the news. She was a celebrity back then. The media made a big deal out of her. This is one of those cases where the media itself made her into a public icon. She and her husband were sort of the Brad and Angelina of the 1920s. (although obviously Angelina Jolie is notable in her own right, but in terms of the press following a couple around everywhere its a good comparison). I'm sure there have got to be some mentions of her in printed works covering the pop culture of America in the 1920s.Singingdaisies (talk) 13:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

If this is the case, then someone who has the time to dig into the archives should have no trouble providing additional sources to improve the article. I personally don't have time to dig that far back while "on patrol", which is why I tagged it for additional sources for verification of notability. Cheers, Turgan ^Talk 05:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

It's not hard to find stuff about the couple; but that to me implies that there should be a section about the relationship in the Tunney article; I don't think she can be argued to be notable separate from Gene. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Turgan. You have created several articles about the uranium mines in Canada, which currently includes only infoboxes. This is not enough for inclusion them as Wikipedia articles. I am not going to nominate these articles for deletion rigth now, but they really needs some work to be done for inclusion. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I created those last week with the intention of expanding them a lot sooner than this. It is a work in progress that will be accomplished very shortly. Thank you for reminding me about them. Turgan ^Talk 08:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Mines generally don't qualify as notable businesses, so those would have been speedied anyway. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I have never seen an article about a mine deleted as the result of a deletion discussion, in fact I have never seen a deletion discussion initiated about a mine in the first place (if you know of any examples I would like to see them, out of interest to see what took place and what arguments were used on both sides). It is pretty easy to assert importance of a mine in an article, however in most cases they pass the general notability guidelines (mines get a lot of press in both business journals, mining related magazines and local papaers), which they have to in order to support inclusion as there is no specific inclusion criteria for mines. --kelapstick (talk) 13:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Turgan, if you do recreate Denison Mine again, here is a source from The Simcoe Reformer that says it was the largest uranium producer in the world (in 1974). Also mindat (which I wouldn't use as a source) combines the Can-Met mine and the Stanrock mine here, I don't know much about EL, but wonder if it changed names at some point in time.--kelapstick (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

In the 60's and 70's Elliot Lake was THE place for uranium production in the world. The town never changed names, but was planned community built in the 50's by and for the mines. There ended up being 12 uranium mines in the immediate area, and one more (Angnew Lake) further east. Turgan ^Talk 23:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

I meant maybe the mine changed names not Elliot Lake. I know a little about Elliot Lake, never been there but drove by the turnoff on hwy 17 a ouple times, and I know a couple people who worked at Dennison, one in the 60s and one just before it closed. Maybe userfication of the deleted articles is an option until you get the sources lined up. kelapstick (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, got ya. I thought Can-Met and Stanrock might be the same mine as well, however after a bit of research they are in fact separate, but very close together. Yes, userfication is a good idea. Turgan ^Talk 00:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Based on this deletion discussion for the Spanish American Mine I have already gone through, I would say they are classed as notable businesses worthy of articles. I had hoped that by conversing with you directly, I could avoid the more formal deletion review process. There are plenty of references available for all 4 deleted mines, including those for the other 8 in the area that have survived. I was just slow in getting the articles up to snuff, and of course, failed to include references with my stubs. I would rather have them restored than recreate them, but I will be doing that shortly if all else fails. Turgan ^Talk 05:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Orangemike, could I request these pages be restored to my userspace until I can improve and take them live?. Thank you, Turgan ^Talk 13:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Turgan ^Talk 07:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey... just wanted to let you know, about the Bryce Harper page I created and that YOU had submitted for speedy deletion... Remember? You had written that "the relevance outside the local Las Vegas area is questionable" and "he is a high school student with the potential to become a professional athelete in the future". Well... Now Bryce Harper is on the front page of Sports Illustrated this week. Why don't you get a life and stop trying to delete pages about baseball when you clearly are clueless about baseball? Yeah... A high school student who hits 570 ft home runs and graces the front page of Sports Illustrated... Terveetkadet (talk)

I refer you to the comment by JamesBWatson on your talk page. That sums it up nicely. Turgan ^Talk 22:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Like I cared... Terveetkadet (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC).

Hey Idiot!!! Bryce Harper was the first pick of this year's MLB Draft and he just signed a 9.9 million $ contract with the Washington Nationals... Still think that "the relevance outside the local Las Vegas area is questionable" and that "he is a high school student with the potential to become a professional athelete in the future"??? Terveetkadet (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi,

Nice place but rather expensive to live in however. I lived there for about 13 or so months but ended up moving back to New South Wales (but hope to move back there again one day). If you have a camera would you be able to get some photos (Places such as the Darwin Convention Centre, the old site of Darwin Hospital [Near Larrakeyah Army/Navy Base])? Bidgee (talk) 12:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

That I can do. It is a very expensive place to live, however I am enjoying the change from Canada. Turgan ^Talk 14:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

I created Four Mile uranium mine before I saw that you had a draft version in your userspace. Your contribution would be much appreciated. I found this source] which I would like to integrate into the article but sentences like "The Four Mile Project currently has a resource of 3.9 Mt at 0.37% U₃O₈ for 15 000 t, or 32 Mlb of U₃O₈ within the Four Mile West deposit." baffle me. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 01:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I will take a look and see what I can add. Turgan ^Talk 02:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I just finished the rewrite and would appreciate some fresh eyes over it as it really isn't a topic I know all that much about to be honest. As you've been to it previously I thought I'd ask here. If you can't be bothered or whatever, its not a problem. ditto Matt if you read this. –Moondyne 16:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

I will be happy to look it over. Turgan ^Talk 22:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Turgan. You have new messages at Talk:Insurrectionary anarchism.
Message added 07:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

for fending off that ferocious "expert" on Greek tragedy! Favonian (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

you are welcome. Turgan ^Talk 23:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Turgan, you were a Saskatchewan uranium guy weren't you? You know anything about this headframe?--kelapstick (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Don't know alot about that mine yet other than some general references, but am learning as I dig through old info for the Beaverlodge area. That mine is on my to-do list. I did not realize just how many mines there were around Uranium City. If you have any info, I would be happy to incorporate it. Turgan ^Talk 23:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I know nothing (and understand even less), I found the picture when searching Flickr for a picture of an Inco headframe, as the one at Vale Inco and Thompson, Manitoba is fair use, and it is a pretty reasonable assumption that we could find another. I thought it was a good one, and figured we could make an article around it, I may take a look and see what I can find, if I get a minute today. That picture would make a great DYK picture for the main page. Cheers.--kelapstick (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

I have started an article for the Gunnar Mine at User:Turgan/Gunnar Mine. I have several other pages on the go there as well. Turgan ^Talk 05:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Also I saw some stuff you have been working on in New Brunswick, you don't need to add ", New Brunswick" if there is no other mine of that name, also per WP:MINESTYLE and WP:CANCITY we use (New Brunswick) for mines (and other geographical features) and ",New Brunswick" for cities/towns. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Doh, I forgot about the style difference. Thanks for the reminder. I had to add New Brunswick to a few as when I was searching for online references I discovered there was more than one, just not all with Wikipedia articles yet. Turgan ^Talk 23:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Here is a list to help explain:

• Golden Wedge Mine, Eagle County, Colorado [3]
• Wedge Mine, Ouray County, Colorado [4]
• Caribou, Colorado, town and silver mine of same name. Potential to separate.
• Caribou Mines, Nova Scotia gold mining

I see the predicament, there is also the option to put the main comodity in the article title, my suggestion would be (capitalize as you desire):

• Golden Wedge Mine
• Wedge Mine (Colorado)
• Wedge Mine (New Brunswick)
• Wedge Mine becomes a DAB page with the three above listed
• Caribou silver mine - for CO
• Caribou gold mine - for NS
• Caribou zinc mine - for NB
• Caribou Mine becomes a DAB page

You may want to move them and make the DAB pages now, or wait until the new ones are ready (I suppose it depends on how long you are going to wait to make them.) Let me know if you need some help with anything.--kelapstick (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

I will make those changes in the next week or so iff all goes well. Just want to find some more detailed references. Cheers Turgan ^Talk 05:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh and I added a {{distinguish}} hat note to Caribou Mine and Caribou Mines, Nova Scotia, to be changed to {{otheruse}} (or something) when the dab page is created.--kelapstick (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

TURGAN HAS A MANGINA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OH COME ON IM FROM THAT REGION AND I JUST PLAYED A VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT AND I KNOW THEY'RE MASCOTS YOU JERK, BUT WHAT EVER ILL STOP HELPING PLL WITH LEARNING ABOUT THE WONDERFUL KOOTENAY SCHOOL DISTRICTS!!! JERK..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.231.205 (talk) 02:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

This commentary, as well as some of the content of the edits I reverted prove that you were not being helpful. Turgan ^Talk 02:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Turgan. You have new messages at 72.215.50.251's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you were a sauce you would be a fairly weak sauce. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.104.241.95 (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, another dissatisfied vandal. Thanks for telling me I am making a diference. Turgan ^Talk 10:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

I blanked the Talk: Jay Jennings page because it's contents was of an early discussion between two parties (myself and another editor) about 'sourcing'. The matter was later cleared-up and resolved by both parties. It's contents are past tense and aren't relevent anymore. We have both moved on. There is no reason for an old, obsolete conversation to remain on the talk page. Timemachine1967 (talk) 07:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

That may be so, however we do not blank article talk pages as per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. The page serves as an archive of past discussions. It is against policy to remove comments of others. The only talk page you can blank is your own, and even then, archiving is prefered. Cheers Turgan ^Talk 12:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I will be more careful on that matter..In future,If you find any mistake done by me, Pls point out my mistakes. After all its mistakes from which we learn! :)

Accept this from me

ARUNKUMAR P.R has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

 arun  talk  16:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for undoing the edit done by 96.246.31.225 on my talk page, and thank you for getting him blocked for a little while. --Clarince63 (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

You're Welcome Turgan ^Talk 00:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your clear and cogent points made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Gospel (book). Much appreciated, Cirt (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I questioned the nomination when I first read it. It did not tale long for the true reason for the nomination to come to light. Our personal views and opinioons can not be used to dictate what is worhty of inclusion. Turgan ^Talk 00:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Turgan. You have new messages at [[User talk:Whodidwhat (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)|User talk:Whodidwhat (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dear Turgan,

There was an extensive discussion in bio of Michal Bucko (my article). I have improved the article and now I would like to ask You to take a look at it again.

Yours sincerely, Dr. Kamil Borkowski —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamilborkowski3 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Go fuck yourself - you self appointed morality douchebag —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.41.73.122 (talk) 15:02, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Not bad, only two and a half months after I reverted your edit ... Turgan ^Talk 12:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

You recently reverted changes that I made to Channel 7's page. It is at the request of the artist that this page be removed in it's entirety as it is full of misstatements and false claims. It is a burden for 7's staff to maintain the information and we do not wish to be a part of this project.

Please honor the artist and remove this page as requested.

7 does not Co-produce. He was not born 7-7-77, he is older than me and I was born 4-2-73 He goes by Seven Marcus Aurelius and no longer is known by the name Channel 7 at all...

The list goes on and on and on. We do not know how to navigate Wiki and do not wish to participate in this project. Please cease and desist.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristWalls (talk • contribs) 20:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Please read what wikipedia is all about. Helping to fix an article is more useful than your disruptive edits because you dont agree with it. Turgan ^Talk 02:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

You recently tagged this as "patent nonsense", when in fact, it was really a poor rewrite of Peas and rice. Although I was going to decline as what you tagged it as, I deleted it under duplication of an existing topic. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

In hindsight I should have tagged it as vandalism. The creator was creating a lot of nonsense and pointless pages. Thank you for deleting it. Turgan ^Talk 13:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I understand you might believe I was expressing a point of view. But I was purely correcting the article. Indeed, islamic manpower didn't "noticeably" helped; they participated in only 3% of after war reconstruction. By changing this correction, you are deliberately spreading historical counter truth on Wikipedia. I advice you to check this reaction from Max Gallo, French historian, on French national TV in which he speaks of after-war non-european immigration: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xp4iu_indigenes-les-vrais-chiffres?start=31

It would be nice from you to check Historical facts before thinking of poltical vandalism. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.68.4.49 (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I stand by my revision. I have no interest in getting involved in a political discussion and I am not undertaking political vandalism. I will continue to revert edits that I consider vandalism, or "questionable, controversial and unsourced". Turgan ^Talk 21:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I was just looking at a document regarding our hoist, and it turns out it was originally used at the Spanish American Mine (I recall seeing you had created that article at one point)...Original report written by Killborn in 1957. The hoist seems to run well, but don't ever buy steel guides that are made in China...--kelapstick (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

It truly is a small world. Turgan ^Talk 03:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that the file is spelt wrong, File:Lambert Projection showing the Ekati and Diavik Diamond Mine, near Barthurst Inlet, Nunavut.png, but correcting it makes it vanish. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 15:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for adding the reference for BHP Billiton Canada Inc. to the Ekati page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.49.63.161 (talk) 01:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Turgan. You have new messages at Tejb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)