User talk:Searchme: Difference between revisions

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #132

Any chance you could alter the contrast between the background and text in the section headings. Possibly white text or lighten the present background. Thanks. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 22:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hows that look? I'm still trying to figure out if I want to keep those colors, I was going for the look of the dirt and turf, but I don't think they go real well together. Joe I 22:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the shade of green for the background is good, and the white text makes it much more readable. You're doing a great job. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 23:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thnx I appreciate the help Joe I 00:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have made a start on the Topics section of the Portal. Unfortunately, I have also started on this section which is here. I am prepared to complete this section if you wish to work on other areas. What do you think? Regards Cuddy Wifter (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, yeah. Yours looks much better than mine, I was starting to get alittle confused on how to put things, but yours looks good. Joe I 13:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Searchme, please do not put the horse racing portal into a bunch of article namespaces, especially given that we don't even put Portal:Horses there! It's a nice portal, but if you notice, Portal:Horses is discreetly transcluded into the WPEQ template that goes on the TALK pages. We don't want to be putting the portal into 3000 articles, putting in on the template is way easier and doesn't clutter up the article namespace. I think you ought to put the portal into the TB horse racing WikiProject's template, so it automatically gets placed in all the horse racing articles. You can also take the portal to [{WP:EQUINE|WPEQ's]] talk page and see if we want to add it to our template also. (or as an option within the template the way we have the horse breeds task force and horse training task force tags on some, but not all articles). I'm not trying to be harsh, I just don't want to have to either add the horses portal to 500 articles or remove yours from 500 articles...the templates are a MUCH better way to go! Montanabw^(talk) 03:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can see some of that. Thats cool. Joe I 23:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great. You're doing good work. The interaction between WPEQ and the horse racing stuff is not a direct correlation, some of us are in both projects, but not all. It's a good synergy because WPEQ could not possibly deal with all the racing sports stuff. It's a big tent. Montanabw^(talk) 20:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Numismatics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 20:38, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Holidays for a Signpost article to be published at the end of November. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Searchme! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have contributed to the article on Chartalism, you might be interested to know that a proposal has been put forward for a Wikiproject on Chartalism, in case you want to support it or participate in the project.-The Gnome (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Numismatic Galleries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Felix the Cassowary 14:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Employment, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Employment and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Employment during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 00:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles