User talk:RHaworth/2016 Nov 27: Difference between revisions

This is an archive of past discussions about User:RHaworth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I need You help to restore the Minimicroeconomics article, PLEASE! The "Minimicroeconomics" article is not an advertising at all. No money side is intended! It is a new direction in Economics and all people need to know about it and start making use of it and make their lives of a little more comfort and justice. This article is the result of my 35 years long scientific researches in that damned Soviet Union conditions. Now, I am a refugee sheltered by the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands and trying hard to deliver to people of the world of a brand new business called business accuracy business ( I am Ph.D. in Economics since 1981 and can submit the education evaluation from the EREC, California. The language of the article is untraditional because the Microeconomics science came into being in an untraditional way. At that times (and even now!), I was totally isolated from the Economics world and everything is created is created by my own and unique enough terminology. But, if You plunge into the article and add Your sound mind, You will see that everything is meaningful and in place, right and just. Another big misfortune is my language. The English I have is the English I invented by myself of not having money for extended English mastering in nice conditions! I need English proficiency classes. I want to an English University. You, Sir better help me deliver the new approaches and new business accuracy tools to the world than delete it!

The terminology is new. They can be shined up AND people get used to them little by little over the time, I hope. When a new science comes into being, a set of new terms gets coined. I had to coin them as I could in my limited circumstances. One more time, PLEASE edit the article to make more understandable to people! PLEASE let the scientists, educators, investors, all goodwill know of the new science and new tools! You know them much more than I do AND You are able to mobilize people's efforts in turning Minimicroeconomics a normal element in our everyday life. This science deserves it, it has suffered so much! It got deported from many countries. It has survived communism and now is so close to be in people's use. Sincerely and gratefully, Milan Fargo October 26, 2016 Chamorro Time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.85.75 (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

• I shall waive my usual no IP address rule. Your piece is blatant original research which is not allowed here. Publish it somewhere else and then wait not just for peer-review but for it to become notable. When that happens you may be confident that someone else with no CoI will write it up here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Good day sir; Can I recreate the article for Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul KU (KKPK) International Inc? Thank you and best regards. God bless. -- Jesielyn08 (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

• Provide me with a link to the article and I will consider it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

It show like this sir when I start to make a draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesielyn08 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you God bless. -- Jesielyn08 (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

• Where on earth did you find that incredibly ponderous link to draft:Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (KKPK) International Inc.? I probably should simply be blocking you as another sockpuppet of Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul Ku (talk · contribs) but just in case you are a different person, I will tell you that the only way you will get an article in is by following this advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

May I ask why the page draft:Goldfinger (mechanism)? Would I still be allowed to create this article? Sorry if I did something wrong it was my first attempt at making an article and I was under the impression that as long as I made it as a draft it was OK to leave it blank temporarily. — EvilxFish (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

• It was deleted because it was not even a start on an article. Wikipedia does not need placeholders. Yes, you may try again but only when you have some actual article material. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, thank you, sorry for putting a placeholder I didn't know that was bad practice here. — EvilxFish (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

CybrHome is one of the rising product company in India, the product is also popular in few European countries and US. It is the most notable tech product from the Indian college NITK Surathkal after Practo Health. It helps people explore the internet/websites just like Pinterest helps people explore images. No such quality portal ever existed and this product is like a complete redesigned version of now defunct yahoo directory. To be noted the product has no ads. It is also one of the few govt funded private organization in India (a reason of no announced VC funding yet if you deleted because valuation was not mentioned). I am an avid CybrHome user and crowd-sourcing contributor on their platform (also Wikipedia) and hence I had created that page. The page was very well written with references and as far as I remember it was written from a neutral point of view after several days of research. There was no promotional content and also it was constantly being edited by various editors for improvements. However, you've recently deleted the page completely without any notice or discussion. I completely understand its possible startups/websites may not be your area of specialization and you may mistakenly consider pages of new companies/products on Wikipedia as spam or promotion. So, I request you to please read that page and restore it. I will add more citations if needed and keep adding more press released as and when I read it in future. If you want changes let me know and I can edit it before restoring but I believe people should really know about CybrHome and the product's page should be on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. DataManiac (talk) 00:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

• When someone with no CoI shares your view that "people should really know about CybrHome" they will come and write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy deleted as G11. I was working on someone else's draft -- Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy -- and didn't finish writing extra references for it when you deleted it. Oops. It was G11 and G12 initially -- I removed copyvios from it and rewrote text to not read in promotional biased way. So when I left it alone for the day, it was under-referenced, but not G11 in my view. I was hoping a new nick in the edit history and a 'Contested deletion' on talk page were enough to assist you with seeing what's happening. Oh well. Please check the last revision and restore it if you think the draft qualifies for further work on it. -- Gryllida (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

• Your last edit emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Gryllida (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Haworth, I have received an email from the office of the Governor of Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC) Saudi Arabia, notifying me that their draft submission of Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim had been deleted as his biography appears on the Global Water Summit website here: http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/speaker/he-dr-abdulrahman-m-al-ibrahim/ and is reserved by copyright. I've copied the message below for your reference: For your information and ready reference the following messages "Doc James (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:H.E. Dr. Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://www.giievent.jp/gwic307103/speakers.shtml)" and "RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:H.E. Dr. Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/speaker/he-dr-abdulrahman-m-al-ibrahim/)" appears on Wikipedia for our submission.

I am an employee of Global Water Intelligence who organises the Global Water Summit (here: http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/the-organisers/ ) if you want to verify my identity you can email me on cp@globalwaterintel.com. I just wanted to let you know that i personally requested this biography from the Governors office, that Global Water Intelligence do not own the copyright of this biography, and Global Water Intelligence is happy for the biography to appear on Wikipedia, as far as i am concerned it is free from copyright regulations. If you need me to add some disclaimer text to the website to state this then just let me know. Best regards, Camilla Prem Global Water Intelligence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.82.247.183 (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks the guy is notable and writes about him here - without honorifics in the title. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

This talk page conversation about a mandal page -> Balanagar mandal, Ranga Reddy district is the mandal and Balanagar, Medchal district is a place in the mandal (neighbourhood). Both pages are needed. Example: Tenali mandal and Tenali. -- Vin09 (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Restored to Balanagar mandal. Why do we need "Ranga Reddy district" in the title? How many more Balanagar mandals are there? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

It should be Medchal district, recently districts reorganisation took place. -- Vin09 (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• So why do we need "Medchal district" in the title? How many more Balanagar mandals are there? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Another in Mahabubnagar district. As of now everything is fine. -- Vin09 (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Sir, Greetings. As you may aware of that you had been deleted my userpage in August due to blatant usage of Wikipedia but it wasn't my fully fault. Actually I had posted an article which get deleted and the reason stated that it's a promotional activity which wasn't so. Due to lack of citations i couldn't fullfill that compulsory object which led to you to delete my userpage. But now i fully aware of that and can affirm that i won't post any article until I have enough citations. Plz remove ban from my userpage. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 14:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Your user page is neither banned nor protected and your user account is neither banned nor blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs)

Please spare some time to provide your email id that i can send you attachment which is showing the following statement "This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference." Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anupamkaler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 07:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• So what exactly do you want to send me as an email attachment? Why can you not copy&paste it into an email created via Special:EmailUser/RHaworth? What information will it contain that is not given at User:Anupamkaler? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I wanted your email id to send the screenshot of whatever is showing on my page, nothing more than that. By the way , i have already been linked my profile in the previous message . I hope it will clear all the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 20:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI, the page you just deleted was immediately recreated by the original creator... -- Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Hello, just to inform you that I have restored shouted title version because it seems to have been deleted under an incorrect criterion. Please let me know if you would like to discuss this — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Obviously it needed to be merged into draft:GoGoVan but apart from that, no objection. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

May I know on what basis Talk:Gandak river, Talk:Gandak and other similar articles deleted. — Pratyush (talk) 11:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• You have seen this discussion. But irrespective of that, quite simply redirects do need talk pages except in very rare circumstances which do not apply here. The only ones I have deleted are talk pages of redirects. PratyushSinha101 (talk · contribs) has also spammed dozens of article talk pages. I have not touched those. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth, just so you know and because you have been partially involved, this has now escalated to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Dharmadhyaksha. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion if anything proves there was nothing with my edits. Spamming? how? All the talk pages tagged were under the scope of respective WikiProjects. Pratyush (talk) 13:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@PratyushSinha101: Please keep all your discussion only on ANI now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Roger, My name is Alan and I have been working on drafting an article draft:SprezzaBox. Apologies for my lack of experience in contributing here on Wikipedia also please forgive me if I am writing wrongly to you here. I am trying to follow your requirements with the article link and signature. I noticed you deleted the article due to "G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion". I also read that the draft article can to be rewritten and replaced with text with a neutral point of view.

My question to you is how I can improve the article and make it neutral. Also if there are any specific parts that stood out as strictly promotional? I am more than willing to revise the article and learn from your expertise. Looking forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance. — AlanLoveLuu (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Your service should be closed down for encouraging needless consumption. I doubt if I spent $28 a year on lifestyle and grooming items. And I doubt if even the most fashion-conscious guy spends $28 a month on such items. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your boxes are notable and writes about them here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Re: PUCIT AIMRL you have marked my article as speedy deletion.I am sorry if i didn't follow the rules for my first article I want the contents of my article for editing purpose and improve my article quality according to the Wikipedia Policies. — Abeera007 (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• There was no need to ask me twice. Text reluctantly emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I see the following notice for my page, Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC): 22:14, 2 November 2016 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

I had made suggested edits given to me by other Wikipedia users to get this page published, and had submitted it for review and publishing. It is not advertising or promotion. There is a page referencing one of our certifications (Certified Research Administrator) and as a member of the RACC board of directors, I have been tasked with getting the corresponding page up that discusses our actual organization. Please undelete this page, a lot of hard work has gone into it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amgray19 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Amgray19 (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• It did not seem too much like advertising so reluctantly restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I very much appreciate you restoring the article. We are a nonprofit, so it would be hard to advertise something when we don't make money off it. We are a certifying body, much like the AICPA is for Certified Public Accountants. Thank you again, and have a great weekend. — Amgray19 (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I have reverted your deletion of Template:Infobox Cass County Prosecutor since the reason given (T2: Template that blatantly misrepresents established policy) is inapplicable. I realise that it is the reason given in this edit: but I can see no way that {{db-policy}} (which is for WP:CSD#T2 cases (templates that are unambiguous misrepresentations of established policy) and displays "a template that is a blatant misrepresentation of established policy") is applicable to this template. -- Redrose64 (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oh dear, I have committed "the greatest treason: to do the right deed for the wrong reason". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Why not have Daron Nefcy on Wikipedia as a redirect page instead of an article? -- SpaceGoofsGeekerBoy (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• So whither would you have it redirect? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For the endless "deletes" you do. Pyrusca (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Do you know if there is a bot that removes transclusions of deleted AfD'd templates? I see that you followed through on this discussion, which has left about 100 redlinked transclusions in articles. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• I do not know of one. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth. I saw that you recently speedily deleted the page Battle Gear under WP:A3 (no content). However, I looked at the article history just before it was deleted, and it looks like it was actually a longstanding redirect (since 2007) to Side by Side (game series) that had been blanked by the user just before they added the speedy deletion template. Speedy deletion should only be performed when all revisions of the page fall under the criteria, so shouldn't we have declined the speedy and reverted back to the redirect? — Mz7 (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Possibly Iftekharahmed96 (talk · contribs) was trying to clear the decks to do the move that I have done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Ah, gotcha. Thanks for clarifying. {{db-move}} or mentioning the move in {{db}} would have been a little more forthright, but no harm, no foul. Mz7 (talk) 21:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Hi there, thank you for your cooperation Mz7, RHaworth was completely correct with what I tried to do. I wanted to rename the page Side by Side to Battle Gear as oppose to keeping the re-direct as the franchise current name is Battle Gear. I do apologise for going about it the wrong way, I should have clarified a more logical reason for the deletion as oppose to stating that it's content free with my edit. — Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Iftekharahmed96. I figured there was a reason and was more curious than anything. At the end of the day, Wikipedia is improved. Mz7 (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Iftekharahmed96, I hope you noticed above that {{db-move}} (one of the G6 deletion reasons) was the tag you should have used. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

So the next time I'm unable to move a page that should be moved, I should use {{db-move}}? yeah, I'll keep that in mind. Cheers! And thanks for being understanding Mz7. I appreciate it! Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey someone last month had mailed me about CybrHome recently which I recently started using and also started contributing on their crowdsourcing portal last week. I visited its wikipedia page (where I arrived via some cached search result page after googling) but it shows no content. Deletion log showed it used to exist but not anymore. I think the delete was unnecessary and you can restore it. I came here to edit and update about their new crowdsourcing policy and new mobile app launched recently. I don't see any issues with it web app portal cybrhome.com or their mobile app as well. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.234.86 (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

You sure do enjoy deleting things, don't you? I was looking for some information on an optics company named "Barska", but apparently, like many, MANY other articles, it was deleted by little ol' you. Just wanted to stop by and say thanks for nothing. Thanks for providing literally nothing at all in the way of information. The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 01:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)