User talk:FlyingLeopard2014/Archives/2007/06: Difference between revisions

Welcome to my talk page. When you leave me a message, it has to be a nice and pleasant message. Not-so-nice messages, sarcasm and vandalism will not be accepted and vandalism will be reverted and sarcasm messages will get archived immediately. Leave me a message on the bottom of the talk page.

Please don't vandalize here, as it will only get you into trouble. (see: [block log] • contributions • [page moves] • current autoblocks)

Archives
-- March 2007
-- April 2007
-- May 2007
-- Hall of Defame

What do we do with vandals? Remember Hdt83 reported it to an adminsistator when 9999a9999 put fake warnings on three of our talk pages? Did he just choose a random administrator or what? Sorry for wasting your time because I found out that you had to deal a lot with a vandal (the one that said he/she did not vandalize a talk page and said he/she can do anything he/she wants with his/her talk page) in Wikipedia. I want to tell you that the IP address 70.244.161.33 recently made a lot of unconstructive edits. I think the IP address will be blocked soon, but I'm just telling you in case it isn't blocked yet.

I want to tell you I currently have over 650 edits. I have been editing a lot yesterday and today. LADodgersAngelsfan 03:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had 700 edits recently. This is my 701st edit. Congratulations on you 4000th edit. Hope you make it to 5000 soon. I want to ask you if Hdt83 knows that I changed my username from 55555five55555 to LADodgersAngelsfan. Can you ask him that for me? LADodgersAngelsfan 08:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This distorts images like flags when they are layered on top of one another, it also occasionally distorts text. I just thought I'd let you know, so that, if you know how, you can fix it (because I have no idea). =) The fixed on top layer notice also seems unnecessary. Also, what are the origins of your new name. You must also get alot of vandalism for the admins to grant your userpage semi-protected status. - Imperator Honorius 15:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting my userpage. RuneWiki777 23:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for this as well. ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 23:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting a recent edit - I recently edited the spice girls article, and was quickly reverted, ill explain my reasons for my edit; I felt that the section was, poorly written (mistakes in it too) with bad grammar, pretty much repeating what was said earlier in the article, also even if it should be kept at all it should not be under the "Future" section of the article considering it talk of nothing apart from the past

Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my user page. It is much appreciated! Chickyfuzz14^{(user talk)} 05:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting up the page into too many pieces (each letter) is going too far. I would think splitting it into about four pieces would be enough, don't you think? And it should be set up so the pieces can be transcluded easily into a combined list for those who want the complete list on one page. NoSeptember 10:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I am doing this because the whenever I open Wikipedia:List of administrators, my computer gets frozen. NHRHS2010 ^Talk 10:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but we don't need twenty plus pages to solve that problem. You just created one page that has only two names on it :p. An approximately equal four way split would look like: A-F, G-O, P-Z, semiactive & Inactive. NoSeptember 10:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I honestly don't think it's a big deal, but I changed it for you. alphachimp 01:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please remove the annoying box that is centered on your userpage whenever I try to scroll? It's extremely bad web design. Thanks, alphachimp 01:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to nominate you so that you could become an administrator. Would you accept or not? NHRHS2010 ^Talk 02:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I am very flattered by your offer, but at this time I have realized that I can do more as a non-administrator. I have developed many positive relationships with other administrators and seen reviewed discussions related to the responsibilities of being an admin. I still see huge amounts of work to be done to fill in the holes in my Wikipedia areas of interest, and being an admin would only detract from my ability to achieve my current goals. I might be interested in the future, and greatly appreciate your offer, but that this time I must decline. Alansohn 02:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considering your edit count (over 4500, larger than mine), I figure that you don't actually want to be adopted anymore, but if you're still interested, I'd be happy to help you out. If not, you should probably remove the infobox from your user page, as it puts you in the category of users wanting to be adopted. If you want some help from an admin in regards to getting adminship someday, you should probably head over to Wikipedia:Admin coaching. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 21:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then you should probably head over to admin coaching; that'd be the right place for you. I removed the infbox, if that's alright. Best of luck! -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 22:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]