User talk:Tnvol88: Difference between revisions

Hi Tnvol88! I noticed your contributions to Millersville, Tennessee and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Millersville, Tennessee has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Augend. I noticed that you recently removed content from Baden culture without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Augend (drop a line) 01:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of messiah claimants. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Don't edit based on your personal beliefs. Wikipedia content is determined by reliable sources. Sundayclose (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't introduce incorrect info. I added the term heresy which is factually correct and corrected incorrect info. Tnvol88 (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Romans didn't care about heresy. They had no religious motives. The Jewish Sanhedrin was concerned about heresy. The Jews didn't crucify him. They turned him over to the Romans for execution. AGAIN, go by what the sources say, not your personal beliefs. Sundayclose (talk) 21:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Baden culture, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I gave valid reasons. I'm refixing again thanks to you. There were false claims without sources in that article that I corrected Tnvol88 (talk) 21:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of messiah claimants. Sundayclose (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added legitimate source material from academia.com, which is a credible source and peer reviewed. Tnvol88 (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i corrected info in that article that was already inaccurate and poorly written Tnvol88 (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of messiah claimants shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]