User talk:Lililolol: Difference between revisions

i got an idea to create a article for the sub unit ,i want you to help by just adding content to Draft:MiSaMo,it is your wish ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 15:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, sure I would like that Lililolol (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 07:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on BTS. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lightoil (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Lililolol, you are edit warring against multiple editors at Face (Jimin album). Given your very recent unblock, I'm surprised you've found yourself back to such disruption so quickly and, in order to avoid a re-block, I suggest you follow WP:DR instead of restoring disputed edits.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Ponyo:, I'm sorry but how the heck my edit was disruptive?? instead of direct me into WP:DR atless explain why lol Lililolol (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not sure what you find so funny. You are edit warring to add and restore your preferred content; other than a very limited amount of exceptions which do not apply here, that is disruptive. When your edits are disputed, the expectation is that you follow dispute resolution and get consensus for your edits. This edit dismissive edit summary is itself disruptive. In your accepted appeal you wrote "I didn't bother reading the guidelines, and that was my fault. I'm sorry about it. I promise to do better in the future" and "What I would do differently in the future is...listen to the other editors who point out issues with my edits". You aren't abiding by either of those unblock terms at present. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeji (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NP83 (talk) 07:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Feel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Born Pink World Tour. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]