Talk:Yoga Vasistha: Difference between revisions

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Hinduism C‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Yoga C‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

In the text box at the right of Yoga Vasishtha, subheading "Scholarship", "Deussen" appears twice. Please remove one of them. (Don't know how to - Edit can't find them).

The Book of Júk (or Jük/Juk) redirects here. Is that correct? The phrase is used by Bahá’u’lláh in his Lawh-i-Abdu'r-Razzáq (excerpt in Gleanings, section LXXXVII):

"Mention hath been made in certain books of a deluge which caused all that existed on earth, historical records as well as other things, to be destroyed. Moreover, many cataclysms have occurred which have effaced the traces of many events. Furthermore, among existing historical records differences are to be found, and each of the various peoples of the world hath its own account of the age of the earth and of its history. Some trace their history as far back as eight thousand years, others as far as twelve thousand years. To any one that hath read the book of Jük it is clear and evident how much the accounts given by the various books have differed."

Please confirm. Wiki-uk (talk) 14:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not that book. --Internet Scholar (talk) 18:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found this article of Juan Cole called "Baha'u'llah on Hinduism and Zoroastrianism: The Tablet to Mirza Abu'l-Fadl Concerning the Questions of Manakji Limji Hataria" which links the two titles. Is there evidence to the contrary? Wiki-uk (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody provide more scholarly opinions about the author and time period of Yogavashishta? What do the Western scholar say about this book's author and time period? Any clues would be very helpful for this article. Thanks.--Internet Scholar (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to Agniakash, the Yoga Vasistha describes time travel (diff1 diff2). A Sanskrit text will not suffice as a source for this, since it is unverifiable, unless one can read Sanskrit (I can't). There are other sources, though:

• This 1891 transaltion/2013 edition says in the intro: "[Book III: On Creation] She does tapas to Goddess Saraswati and obtains the boon to have her husband's spirit always with her. She and the goddess astral travel and time travel to see the couple's prior life as simple brahmins"
• This website specifies that the time travel is being mentioned in Book III chapter 15-58, but does not specify which chapter.

Besides this unclearness, it seems to be WP:UNDUE to mention this, without a proper context and explanation. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan: It is amazing and flawed WP:OR by @Agniakash. It does not belong in this article. @Agniakash: please read WP:RS and respect wikipedia's content policies. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yoga Vasistha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051223133656/http://www.indologie.uni-halle.de/forschung/Moksopaya/pradyumna.htm to http://www.indologie.uni-halle.de/forschung/Moksopaya/pradyumna.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmasansthapana: please don't edit war and explain you allegation / concerns. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]