Talk:Corinna: Difference between revisions

A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.

Corinna has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 12, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Biography GA‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Classical Greece and Rome GA‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Poetry GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Women writers GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Greece GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Women's History GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase. You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Corinna (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 23:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Corinna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this, I should be posting comments tomorrow! Kingsif (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Lead good length for article
• Very well written in a considered voice - neutral but interesting
• Informative in a tone appropriate for subject
• Good progression of information through paragraphs and sections
• Not much to say as it is consistently well-written:
  • there are no visible issues with grammar
  • language is good and voice is strong
  • reads well throughout
• Very well done
• Pass

• Lead good length, comprehensive on the main issues regarding the subject which also double as a summary of her biography
• Concise with good depth on the subject and her works; additional information included contextualizes the subject and is only to the article's benefit
• Would perhaps question if there's more comparison with Sappho/other Greek female poets? There's the Smyth note in the lead and the Skinner note on women's poetry, but if her work is of interest because she is one of few female poets with preserved work, is there not more on the comparisons?
  • Looking through the edit history, more on this was added shortly before nom; with such good research in the article I am assuming if there was more available on comparisons it would have been added then.
• Pass

• Multiple good quality images.
• Satisfactory for article length
• Pass

• weighs opinions of the bio well
• and views of the poetry and others' opinions also neutral
• Pass

• No major changes since nom
• Other big changes in October '18 or earlier
• Pass

• Many high quality sources.
• Pass

• Looks clean
• Pass

• Exceptionally good article. Kingsif (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

...for all the work you have done improving this article. Sweet6970 (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Caeciliusinhorto: The 2nd para of Life has One of the first scholars to question this was Edgar Lobel in 1930,[11] who concluded that there is no reason to believe that she the orthography used on the Berlin papyrus, on which fragments of two of her poems are preserved. There’s something missing here – can you clarify, please? Sweet6970 (talk) 10:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]