[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Frog battery: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spinningspark (talk | contribs)
m History: correcting date in ref
Spinningspark (talk | contribs)
expand annotation of lede picture
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Matteucci's frog battery trimmed2.jpg|thumb|300px|Matteucci's frog battery, 1845]]
[[File:Matteucci's frog battery trimmed2.jpg|thumb|300px|Matteucci's frog battery, 1845 (top left); Aldini's frog battery, 1803 (bottom); apparatus for controlled exposure of gases to frog battery (top right).]]
A '''frog battery''' is an [[battery (electricity)|electrochemical battery]] consisting of a number of dead frogs (the [[electrochemical cell|cells]] of the battery) connected together in a [[series and parallel circuits#Series circuits|series]] arrangement. It is a kind of [[biobattery]]. It was used in early scientific investigations of electricity and academic demonstrations.
A '''frog battery''' is an [[battery (electricity)|electrochemical battery]] consisting of a number of dead frogs (the [[electrochemical cell|cells]] of the battery) connected together in a [[series and parallel circuits#Series circuits|series]] arrangement. It is a kind of [[biobattery]]. It was used in early scientific investigations of electricity and academic demonstrations.



Revision as of 12:21, 1 May 2011

Matteucci's frog battery, 1845 (top left); Aldini's frog battery, 1803 (bottom); apparatus for controlled exposure of gases to frog battery (top right).

A frog battery is an electrochemical battery consisting of a number of dead frogs (the cells of the battery) connected together in a series arrangement. It is a kind of biobattery. It was used in early scientific investigations of electricity and academic demonstrations.

Background

In the early days of electrical research a common method of detecting electric current was by means of a frog's leg galvanoscope for which a good supply of live frogs was kept to hand by the researcher ready to have their legs prepared for the galvanoscope. Frogs were therefore a convenient material to use in other experiments. They were small, easily handled, the legs were especially sensitive to electric current, and they carried on responding longer than other animal candidates for this role.[1]

Preparation

Frog half-thighs in series

It was usual to use the thighs of frogs for this purpose. The legs of the frog were first skinned, then the lower leg was cut off at the knee joint and discarded. Damaging the muscle during this procedure would detract from the results. The thigh muscle was then cut in two transversely to produce two half-thighs. Only the lower, conical shaped piece is kept. The half-thighs were then laid on an insulator of varnished wood so arranged that the inside surface of one was in contact with the outside surface of the next, with the conical ends of the outside surface being pushed into the cavity of the cut surface. The ends of the pile laid in cups of water sunk into the wood and formed the terminals of the battery.[2][3]

Other constructions could also be used. For instance the complete rear legs could be used with the sciatic nerves exposed so that the nerve of one frog could be connected to the feet of the next. Whole frogs too could be used. Although it was more time consuming to prepare the thigh muscles, most experimenters preferred to do this since it gave better results.[4]

The arrangement of inside surface connected to outside surface was on the basis of the not exactly correct[5] theory that there was an electric current in muscles continually flowing from the inside to the outside.

History

Golding Bird's frog battery, 1848

The first frog battery was constructed by Eusebio Valli in the 1790s with a chain of 10 frogs. Valli had difficulty understanding all of his own results; he followed Luigi Galvani in believing that animal electricity (or galvanic electricity) was a different phenomenon from metal-metal electricity (or voltaic electricity), even denying its existence. Alessandro Volta's theory was proved correct when he succeeded in constructing the voltaic pile without the use of any animal material. Because Valli found himself on the wrong side in this dispute, and refused to change despite the evidence, his work has become a bit of a backwater and his frog battery is little known and poorly documented.[6]

Aldini's 1803 ox-head battery

Leopoldo Nobili built a frog battery in 1818 out of complete frog legs which he called a frog pile. He used this to investigate animal electricity but his experiments were strongly criticised by Volta who argued that the true source of electricity was dissimilar metals in the external circuit. According to Volta, fluids in the frog merely provided the electrolyte.[7]

The first well-known frog battery was constructed by Carlo Matteucci which was described in a paper presented to the Royal Society in 1845 by Michael Faraday on his behalf. It later also appeared in the popular medical student physics textbook Elements of Natural Philosophy by Golding Bird. Matteucci constructed his battery from a pile of 12 to 14 half-thighs of frogs. Nevertheless, the frog battery was sufficiently powerful to decompose potassium iodide. Matteucci aimed with this apparatus to address Volta's criticism of Nobili by constructing a circuit, as far as possible, entirely out of biological material and hence prove the existence of animal electricity.[8]

Frogs were not the only creatures to be press-ganged into serving as battery components. In 1803 Giovanni Aldini demonstrated that electricity could be obtained from an ox head from a freshly killed animal. A frog galvanometer connected between the ox's tongue and ear showed a reaction. A greater reaction was obtained when Aldini joined two or three heads together into a battery. Later, in the 1840s, Matteucci also created eel batteries, pigeon batteries (using living pigeons) and rabbit batteries.[9][2]

References

  1. ^ Bird (1849), pp.28-29
    Valli, p.22
  2. ^ a b Longet and Matteucci, "Traité des phénomènes electro-physiologiques des animaux", "Rapport entre le sens du courant electrique et les contractions musculaires dues et ce courant" The Medico-chirurgical Review, vol.46, p.311, April 1845.
  3. ^ Matteucci (1848), p.391
    Rutter, pp.110-113
  4. ^ Rutter, p.112
  5. ^ Kipnis, pp.144-145
  6. ^ Bird (1848), p.344
    *Valli, p.155, Experiment 122 uses 10 frogs
    Kipnis, pp.144-145
  7. ^ Clarke & Jacyna, p.199
    Clarke & O'Malley, p.186
  8. ^ Bird (1848), pp.344-345
    Matteucci (1845), pp.284-285
  9. ^ Bird (1848), p.341-342
    Matteucci (1848), p.391

Bibliography