Coxeter group: Difference between revisions

In mathematics, a Coxeter group, named after H.S.M. Coxeter, is an abstract group that admits a formal description in terms of mirror symmetries. Indeed, the finite Coxeter groups are precisely the finite Euclidean reflection groups; the symmetry groups of regular polyhedra are an example. However, not all Coxeter groups are finite, and not all can be described in terms of symmetries and Euclidean reflections. Coxeter groups were introduced (Coxeter 1934) as abstractions of reflection groups, and finite Coxeter groups were classified in (Coxeter 1935).

Coxeter groups find applications in many areas of mathematics. Examples of finite Coxeter groups include the symmetry groups of regular polytopes, and the Weyl groups of simple Lie algebras. Examples of infinite Coxeter groups include the triangle groups corresponding to regular tessellations of the Euclidean plane and the hyperbolic plane, and the Weyl groups of infinite-dimensional Kac–Moody algebras.

Standard references include (Humphreys 1990) harv error: no target: CITEREFHumphreys1990 (help) and (Davis 2007).

Formally, a Coxeter group can be defined as a group with the presentation

${\displaystyle \left\langle r_{1},r_{2},\ldots ,r_{n}\mid (r_{i}r_{j})^{m_{ij}}=1\right\rangle }$

where ${\displaystyle m_{ii}=1}$ and ${\displaystyle m_{ij}\geq 2}$ for ${\displaystyle i\neq j}$. The condition ${\displaystyle m_{ij}=\infty }$ means no relation of the form ${\displaystyle (r_{i}r_{j})^{m}}$ should be imposed.

A number of conclusions can be drawn immediately from the above definition.

• The relation m_{i i} = 1 means that (r_ir_i )¹ = (r_i )² = 1 for all i ; the generators are involutions.
• If m_{i j} = 2, then the generators r_i and r_j commute. This follows by observing that

xx = yy = 1,

together with

xyxy = 1

implies that

xy = x(xyxy)y = (xx)yx(yy) = yx.

Alternatively, since the generators are involutions, ${\displaystyle r_{i}=r_{i}^{-1}}$, so ${\displaystyle (r_{i}r_{j})^{2}=r_{i}r_{j}r_{i}r_{j}=r_{i}r_{j}r_{i}^{-1}r_{j}^{-1}}$, and thus is equal to the commutator.

• In order to avoid redundancy among the relations, it is necessary to assume that m_{i j}=m_{j i}. This follows by observing that

yy = 1,

together with

(xy)^m = 1

implies that

(yx)^m = (yx)^myy = y(xy)^my = yy = 1.

Alternatively, ${\displaystyle (xy)^{m}}$ and ${\displaystyle (yx)^{m}}$ are conjugate elements, as ${\displaystyle y(xy)^{m}y^{-1}=(yx)^{m}yy^{-1}=(yx)^{m}}$.

The Coxeter matrix is the n×n, symmetric matrix with entries m_{i j}. Indeed, every symmetric matrix with positive integer and ∞ entries and with 1's on the diagonal serves to define a Coxeter group. The Coxeter matrix can be conveniently encoded by a Coxeter graph, as per the following rules.

• The vertices of the graph are labelled by generator subscripts.
• Vertices i and j are connected if and only if m_{i j} ≥ 3.
• An edge is labelled with the value of m_{i j} whenever it is 4 or greater.

In particular, two generators commute if and only if they are not connected by an edge. Furthermore, if a Coxeter graph has two or more connected components, the associated group is the direct product of the groups associated to the individual components. Thus the disjoint union of Coxeter graphs yields a direct sum of Coxeter matrices and a direct product of Coxeter groups.

The graph in which vertices 1 through n are placed in a row with each vertex connected by an unlabelled edge to its immediate neighbors gives rise to the symmetric group S_n+1; the generators correspond to the transpositions (1 2), (2 3), ... (n n+1). Two non-consecutive transpositions always commute, while (k k+1) (k+1 k+2) gives the 3-cycle (k k+2 k+1). Of course this only shows that S_n+1 is a quotient group of the Coxeter group described by the graph, but it is not too difficult to check that equality holds.

Coxeter groups are deeply connected with reflection groups. Simply put, Coxeter groups are abstract groups (given via a presentation), while reflection groups are concrete groups (given as subgroups of linear groups or various generalizations). Coxeter groups grew out of the study of reflection groups — they are an abstraction: a reflection group is a subgroup of a linear group generated by reflections (which have order 2), while a Coxeter group is an abstract group generated by involutions (elements of order 2, abstracting from reflections), and whose relations have a certain form (${\displaystyle (r_{i}r_{j})^{k}}$, corresponding to hyperplanes meeting at an angle of ${\displaystyle \pi /k}$, with ${\displaystyle r_{i}r_{j}}$ being of order k abstracting from a rotation by ${\displaystyle 2\pi /k}$).

The abstract group of a reflection group is a Coxeter group, while conversely a reflection group can be seen as a linear representation of a Coxeter group. For finite reflection groups, this yields an exact correspondence: every finite Coxeter group admits a faithful representation as a finite reflection group of some Euclidean space. For infinite Coxeter groups, however, a Coxeter group may not admit a representation as a reflection group.

Historically, (Coxeter 1934) proved that every reflection group is a Coxeter group (i.e., has a presentation where all relations are of the form ${\displaystyle r_{i}^{2}}$ or ${\displaystyle (r_{i}r_{j})^{k}}$), and indeed this paper introduced the notion of a Coxeter group, while (Coxeter 1935) proved that every finite Coxeter group had a representation as a reflection group, and classified finite Coxeter groups.

The finite Coxeter groups were classified in (Coxeter 1935), in terms of Coxeter–Dynkin diagrams; they are all represented by reflection groups of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces.

The finite Coxeter groups consist of three one-parameter families of increasing rank ${\displaystyle A_{n},BC_{n},D_{n},}$ one one-parameter family of dimension two, ${\displaystyle I_{2}(p),}$ and six exceptional groups: ${\displaystyle E_{6},E_{7},E_{8},F_{4},H_{3},}$ and ${\displaystyle H_{4}.}$

Many, but not all of these, are Weyl groups, and every Weyl group can be realized as a Coxeter group. The Weyl groups are the families ${\displaystyle A_{n},BC_{n},}$ and ${\displaystyle D_{n},}$ and the exceptions ${\displaystyle E_{6},E_{7},E_{8},F_{4},}$ and ${\displaystyle I_{2}(6),}$ denoted in Weyl group notation as ${\displaystyle G_{2}.}$ The non-Weyl groups are the exceptions ${\displaystyle H_{3}}$ and ${\displaystyle H_{4},}$ and the family ${\displaystyle I_{2}(p)}$ except where this coincides with one of the Weyl groups (namely ${\displaystyle I_{2}(3)\cong A_{2},I_{2}(4)\cong BC_{2},}$ and ${\displaystyle I_{2}(6)\cong G_{2}}$).

This can be proven by comparing the restrictions on (undirected) Dynkin diagrams with the restrictions on Coxeter diagrams of finite groups:^{[note 1]} Dynkin diagrams have the additional restriction that the only permitted edge labels are 2, 3, 4, and 6, which yields the above. Geometrically, this corresponds to the crystallographic restriction theorem, and the fact that excluded polytopes do not fill space or tile the plane – for ${\displaystyle H_{3},}$ the dodecahedron (dually, icosahedron) does not fill space; for ${\displaystyle H_{4},}$ the 120-cell (dually, 600-cell) does not fill space; for ${\displaystyle I_{2}(p)}$ a p-gon does not tile the plane except for ${\displaystyle p=3,4,}$ or 6 (the triangular, square, and hexagonal tilings, respectively).

Note further that the (directed) Dynkin diagrams B_n and C_n give rise to the same Weyl group (hence Coxeter group), because they differ as directed graphs, but agree as undirected graphs – direction matters for root systems but not for the Weyl group; this corresponds to the hypercube and cross-polytope being different regular polytopes but having the same symmetry group.

Some properties of the finite Coxeter groups are given in the following table:

Group symbol	Alternate symbol	Bracket notation	Rank	Order	Related polytopes	Coxeter-Dynkin diagram
An	An	[3n]	n	(n + 1)!	n-simplex	...
Bn = Cn	Cn	[4,3n-1]	n	2n n!	n-hypercube / n-cross-polytope	...
Dn	Bn	[3n-3,1,1]	n	2n−1 n!	n-demihypercube	...
E6	E6	[32,2,1]	6	51840	221 polytope
E7	E7	[33,2,1]	7	2903040	321 polytope
E8	E8	[34,2,1]	8	696729600	421 polytope
F4	F4	[3,4,3]	4	1152	24-cell
H3	G3	[3,5]	3	120	icosahedron / dodecahedron
H4	G4	[3,3,5]	4	14400	120-cell / 600-cell
I2(p)	D2p	[p]	2	2p	p-gon

All symmetry groups of regular polytopes are finite Coxeter groups, and note that dual polytopes have the same symmetry group.

There are three series of regular polytopes in all dimensions. The symmetry group of a regular n-simplex is the symmetric group S_n+1, also known as the Coxeter group of type A_n. The symmetry group of the n-cube and its dual, the n-cross-polytope is BC_n, and is known as the hyperoctahedral group.

The exceptional regular polytopes in dimensions two, three, and four, correspond to other Coxeter groups. In two dimensions, the dihedral groups, which are the symmetry groups of regular polygons, form the series I₂(p). In three dimensions, the symmetry group of the regular dodecahedron and its dual, the regular icosahedron, is H₃, known as the full icosahedral group. In four dimensions, there are three special regular polytopes, the 24-cell, the 120-cell, and the 600-cell. The first has symmetry group F₄, while the other two are dual and have symmetry group H₄.

The Coxeter groups of type D_n, E₆, E₇, and E₈ are the symmetry groups of certain semiregular polytopes.

The affine Weyl groups form a second important series of Coxeter groups. These are not finite themselves, but each contains a normal abelian subgroup such that the corresponding quotient group is finite. In each case, the quotient group is itself a Weyl group, and the Coxeter graph is obtained from the Coxeter graph of the Weyl group by adding an additional vertex and one or two additional edges. For example, for n ≥ 2, the graph consisting of n+1 vertices in a circle is obtained from A_n in this way, and the corresponding Coxeter group is the affine Weyl group of A_n. For n = 2, this can be pictured as the symmetry group of the standard tiling of the plane by equilateral triangles.

A list of the affine Coxeter groups follows:

Group symbol	Alternate symbol	Bracket notation	Related uniform tessellation(s)	Coxeter-Dynkin diagram
A~n-1	Pn	[3[n]]	Simplex-rectified-simplex honeycomb A~2:Triangular tiling A~3:Tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb	...
B~n-1	Sn	[4,3n-3,31,1]	Demihypercubic honeycomb	...
C~n-1	Rn	[4,3n-2,4]	Hypercubic honeycomb	...
D~n-1	Qn	[ 31,1,3n-4,31,1]	Demihypercubic honeycomb	...
E~6	T7	[32,2,2]	2 22 honeycomb
E~7	T8	[33,3,1]	3 31 honeycomb 1 33 honeycomb
E~8	T9	[35,2,1]	5 21 honeycomb 2 51 honeycomb 1 52 honeycomb
F~4	U5	[3,4,3,3]	Hexadecachoric honeycomb and Icositetrachoric honeycomb
H~2	V3	[6,3]	Hexagonal tiling and Triangular tiling
I~1	W2	[∞]	apeirogon

Note the subscript is one less than the number of nodes in each case, since each of these groups was obtained by adding a node to a finite group's graph.

There are infinitely many hyperbolic Coxeter groups describing reflection groups in hyperbolic space, notably including the hyperbolic triangle groups.

A choice of reflection generators gives rise to a length function l on a Coxeter group, namely the minimum number of uses of generators required to express a group element; this is precisely the length in the word metric in the Cayley graph. An expression for v using l(v) generators is a reduced word. For example, the permutation (13) in S₃ has two reduced words, (12)(23)(12) and (23)(12)(23). The function ${\displaystyle v\to (-1)^{l(v)}}$ defines a map ${\displaystyle G\to \{\pm 1\},}$ generalizing the sign map for the symmetric group.

Using reduced words one may define three partial orders on the Coxeter group, the weak order, the absolute order and the Bruhat order (named for François Bruhat). An element v exceeds an element u in the Bruhat order if some (or equivalently, any) reduced word for v contains a reduced word for u as a substring, where some letters (in any position) are dropped. In the weak order, v ≥ u if some reduced word for v contains a reduced word for u as an initial segment. Indeed, the word length makes this into a graded poset. The Hasse diagrams corresponding to these orders are objects of study, and are related to the Cayley graph determined by the generators. The absolute order is defined analogously to the weak order, but with generating set/alphabet consisting of all conjugates of the Coxeter generators.

For example, the permutation (1 2 3) in S₃ has only one reduced word, (12)(23), so covers (12) and (23) in the Bruhat order but only covers (12) in the weak order.

Since a Coxeter group W is generated by finitely many elements of order 2, its abelianization is an elementary abelian 2-group, i.e. it is isomorphic to the direct sum of several copies of the cyclic group Z₂. This may be restated in terms of the first homology group of W.

The Schur multiplier M(W) (related to the second homology) was computed in (Ihara & Yokonuma 1965) for finite reflection groups and in (Yokonuma 1965) for affine reflection groups, with a more unified account given in (Howlett 1988). In all cases, the Schur multiplier is also an elementary abelian 2-group. For each infinite family {W_n} of finite or affine Weyl groups, the rank of M(W) stabilizes as n goes to infinity.

• Artin group
• Triangle group
• Coxeter element
• Coxeter number
• Complex reflection group
• Chevalley–Shephard–Todd theorem
• Hecke algebra, a quantum deformation of the group algebra
• Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomial
• Longest element of a Coxeter group

• Every finitely generated Coxeter group is an Automatic group ^[1]

• Weisstein, Eric W. "Coxeter group". MathWorld.
• Jenn, software for visualizing the Cayley graphs of finite Coxeter groups on up to four generators.