User talk:Lightlylove: Difference between revisions

Hi Lightlylove! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jennie (singer) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Huh Yunjin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No it was literally removed and deleted. Lightlylove (talk) 04:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Chaeyeon (singer) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even know what are Creative Commons License? They are videos where even the thumbnail are permitted to re-use under creative purposes license cause the thumbnail still belongs to the video, is not any copyright violation. Lightlylove (talk) 05:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Seoul Success Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. An edit that you recently made to Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Blackpink seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:42, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moonlight Sunrise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonlight Sunrise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  06:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:NBANDMEMBER

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuna (South Korean singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lightlylove! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You don't change an article name without a consensus. Read here: WP:RM Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 05:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Ready to Be. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No the page "Ready to Be Ready" was created by me only, send me your social media and i'd show you the screenshot of the draft i did on quick memo of my phone which is were the page was originally created, and was posted way before but a user kept deleting and putting the redirect back and i sent him a message on his talk page, you can see whenever you want to and he moved it to a draft, but when i saw the draft it clearly said that page was created by an user called "Perghhh" and that's why i deleted it, i didn't took credit from anybody, that page was created by me and later changed. Lightlylove (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Learn to check properly ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was exactly with you that i discussed it, don't remember when you kept on deleting and redirecting the page? You yourself moved it into a draft, scroll through talk page and see our conversation, here's the conversation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:UtherSRG#Ready_to_Be_redirect Lightlylove (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit summary, and to tell the article was created by me first that's why I got the credit and but i am telling you the draft will be accepted soon ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 14:42, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop lying that article wasn't created by you, it was by me and you changed and edited differently, that article was posted by me days back and a user kept deleting and moved it into a draft when i discussed it with him but when i went and entered to the draft page, in the page information said that it was created by a user called "Perghhh" that's why i deleted it, cause it was me and me only the one that created that article. Lightlylove (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you can't digest the fact that someone else can create before you ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your article the one you created on March 3, 2023, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1142592732 but the freakin one standing now its mine and was created by me on March 5, 2023, nobody edited your article cause it was eliminated while mine was moved into a draft and now you think you created it. Lightlylove (talk) 20:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your nerve is disgusting, the fact that you claim that such thing was created by you so easily even knowing it wasn't you is just sick, everything about that article was written by me, including all the sources specially the headline planet one, i can show my browser history of how i researched everything. Lightlylove (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe go and check the contribution I created it before you ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the proof ,i created this article on March 3 and it was reverted because we should follow the rules of wikipedia

Here is the link [1] ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 01:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And stop removing content from the draft ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And remember to check the history of the page and speak ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i thought to be sweet to you but you think you created the article, hope my proof shuts this matter ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse you? The history of all those redirects show who is the real owner, the first edit was by ME, you can check it in every Ready to Be page cause there is 3, just check my contributions history, you didn't write sh**, this just shows me that you are a freak behind your profile, to claim that you wrote the article with such confidence is completely delirious, your nerve has no limits. Lightlylove (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And if you created a Ready To Be Draft was another one, admit it, what a coincidence that you article is written exactly like mine and has the same sources waoo, i can show the place where i originally created it, that user "Perghhh" copied and pasted my article and drafted it and now you think is your article but it is not, you need to put on work your brain cells. Lightlylove (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was the same article ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waoo now are you even copying my whole history, do you have a personality change mental problem? The only one that created this article on March 3, 2023 was ME, and it was deleted cause it didn't meet WP album standards, the fact that you have the nerve to reach that level is something else, when you can enter the page and it clearly see that it says a user called "Perghhh" created when it was ME and now you are saying you did it, what is wrong with you. Lightlylove (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said check the history my name is also there and the person who edited as whole article will be notified as the author I observed this so like that i said created it first ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay now i understand your point, yes you created content for the page first, but i was talking about that the content that stayed now as a draft is my version/content that i created even though it has been changed cause a lot of people have already edited it or deleted some stuff, but yeah the page in itself was not created by me, it was originally a redirect, i was talking about the content that i created and it was accepted and someone turned it into a draft, i thought you were claiming that you did that. Lightlylove (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i never claimed your content was mine if I had why would send the proof I created first ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue with the personal attacks and incivility, you will be blocked from editing.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that user claims she created an article she didn't do, acusses me, takes all the credit, doesn't understand when i try to explain what really happened, and i am the one that needs to get blocked? Lightlylove (talk) 21:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that the content was given by me i said the articles content was given by me first ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

there's a confusion going on and i'd like to explain to you why she's wrong saying that the article was created by her, here's what's happening, the current draft "Ready to Be" was written and created all by me and a user called "Perghhh" submitted it into a draft, that page was originally a redirect page and she created the article information on March 3 however it was deleted by an user who thought didn't meet WP standards for albums pages but then in March 5, i created my own article information and it got deleted few times as well for the same reason, so i talked and discussed it with the user who kept reverting and he told me that he would turned it into a draft so when i enter to see my draft article it says that the page was created by Perghhh, This is her article the one she created on March 3, 2023, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1142592732 but the one standing now its mine and was created by me on March 5, 2023 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1142925133 nobody edited her article cause it was eliminated while mine was moved into a draft and now she think she created it but its a confusion. Lightlylove (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is completely inconsequential to our readers who created the draft/article and continuing to argue and disrupt the draft process in order to prove who "got there first" flies in the face of the purpose of the encyclopedia. Throwing out personal attacks and questioning another editor's mental health based on a petty squabble is completely unacceptable. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should block that user a long time ago. @Lightlylove not only involve in edit warring, but also for disruptive editing and for providing unreliable sources to readers. Kenquenito (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To Be honest it is the same page with mine first and yours is second ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 12:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lets create the article now ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jihyo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 03:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most artists articles have notes on what the artist is known and praised for, just read Jennie from Blackpink, Red Velvet's Seulgi, Tzuyu and Momo from Twice articles and you"ll see specially western artists articles like Ariana Grande etc, saying that she's noted for her vocals and performance skills is not overpraising specially since there are various reliable sources claiming it, it looks like you just want to bother in every article i edited or in every article i collaborate, where have you been in others? Lightlylove (talk) 03:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also reverted the picture that had nothing to do with this issue, and literally every wikipedia page of artists have various pictures of them, it is very normal at WP and you should know that as a top editor, at this point nitpicking everything that i do is just making you reach limits out of WP:Rules and you are not respecting them just to revert my edits, its not benefiting any us, i'm taken back for growing here and your ignoring WP:Rules Guidline just to shut others editors down. Lightlylove (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jihyo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the second time, i did not add my own commentary or personal opinion on Jihyo's article, she's not even my favorite from her group, i added what the media and fans says, i added notability, you are the one that ia in the wrong for reverting it. Lightlylove (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightlylove Please read WP:PUFFERY and WP:PEACOCK instead. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have to read that, i know how it works, i used reliable sources and facts to conclude what i wrote, i invite you to look at those articles i've mentioned on my previous replies, or every wikipedia article of an artist and you"ll see that is not bias mentioning that they're known for this or for that or they've been praised for their voice. Lightlylove (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

This draft is for a title that was previously an article, but was then cut down to a redirect. If this draft is accepted, the history should be preserved. Do not tag the redirect for G6.

Reviewers should check the history and verify whether there was a consensus to cut the article down to a redirect, or whether the action was taken boldly without discussion. If there was a consensus for the cutdown, do not accept this draft without verifying that the draft improves the article or that consensus has changed. If in doubt, please discuss. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeh Shuhua.

This draft does not show that the subject has achieved individual musical notability, or shown significant accomplishments since June 2021.

If this draft is resubmitted, please explain, in AFC comments or on the draft talk page, how she has achieved notability since the previous article was cut down to a redirect.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yeh Shuhua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I truly can't understand how she is not notable when she has larger media coverage than past member Soojin whom article is filled with unreliable sources and literally says nothing, has little information, Shuhua has had more appearances everywhere than her, and has participated in many more activities too, you can go to her page and see that its worse edited than this one and is still published, just because she had a bullying scandal doesn't make her notable, i'm just asking to be fair, this article shows that Shuhua is very notable and almost all the sources are outside (G)-idle unlike the other. Lightlylove (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jihyo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tidal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you so much for the reminder and for correcting it, Blessings! Lightlylove (talk) 00:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you have been using unreliable sources .Please add only reliable source.Please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now which thing are you going to invent next? Ever since i started my wikipedia page i have never used not even once an unreliable source, all my edits are always filled with reliable sources and well recieved by the public sources, in WP clearly says that you can add sources that are not in the WP:Reliable Sources list which includes the sources that are verified, depricated and blacklisted but only if they have clear reputation by professionals and other websites, it clearly says that we can add sources that haven't entered to that list righteously which means if they have good reputation or not and by just looking at how it's written and what is the content involved we can distinguish the reliable ones, i don't need to read or see any of the guideline, if there is someone that understands it its me, i dare you to list me an essay of the unreliable sources claimed by WP guideline and overall websites that i have ever added here, if you continue to invent things and raise slander just to argue with me, i'm going to talk with a WP administrator, you seriously need to stop trying to find any way just to raise slander against me and defame me, in fact i have removed many unreliable sources you have added in many articles regarding K-pop, also added back lot of content you have removed, this is seriously not it, if that's not your intention then i apologize but all of these non-existent problems you are discussing can only be interpreted otherwise and very misunderstood with valid reason. Lightlylove (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have no intention take up a fight with anyone . i have noticed that you have added so i told .Because Instagram and Twitter aren't reliable and speaking about "in WP clearly says that you can add sources that are not in the WP:Reliable Sources list which includes the sources that are verified, depricated and blacklisted but only if they have clear reputation by professionals and other websites, it clearly says that we can add sources that haven't entered to that list righteously " .It would be better if you show me ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The thing about my adding of unreliable sources ,i think it was done when i was new here ,so i have learnt not to do it. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the page carefully you"ll see that in the Twitter and Instagram section clearly says that they are reliable when it comes from verified and official accounts/users, they are not reliable sources but when the information comes from a verified and legit account then it can be added. Lightlylove (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and scroll down until you see Twitter and read the description that says "Twitter is a social network. As a self-published source, it is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the author is a subject-matter expert or the tweet is used for an uncontroversial self-description. In most cases, Twitter accounts should only be cited if they are verified accounts or if the user's identity is confirmed in some way. Tweets that are not covered by reliable sources are likely to constitute undue weight. So Twitter can be use as a source when it comes from a verified account. Lightlylove (talk) 04:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources article also gives us the guide and rules on how to use lightweight sources, how to use sources that are still not in the list, its the first written in the article. Lightlylove (talk) 04:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but it never said instagram was reliable ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"if you continue to invent things and raise slander just to argue with me, i'm going to talk with a WP administrator, you seriously need to stop trying to find any way just to raise slander against me and defame me"

I never mean it .i think you are always in the mood of thinking your correct , no one else is correct expect you .Last time also you did the same . please just try to understand before you comment any thing ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are troll who defame wikipedians .But i am not a troll . if you really think just think then say it to an administrator ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you are troll and i am not a person that thinks that i am always right but i simply dont like when someone acusses me of something i have never do, that's what bothers me, i am always getting those and its really tiring Lightlylove (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't accuse you ,i just said it ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, let's leave this and try to be good with each other ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With instagram is just the same, read their discussion. Lightlylove (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

where? ArmyOnceBlinkMidzy (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightlylove's talk page has a lot of complaints about their attitude and the way they edit an article, yet they can't acknowledge these things. It's such a shame that a lot of users, including us, need to waste our time just to educate this immature creature. Kenquenito (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]