[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Template:Criticism section: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Partial revert of Knowledgekid87: It's important that we give direct guidance to editors who want to know why criticism sections are bad; currently, that exists at WP:Criticism, which is more of an explainer than an opinion essay. It is also linked from the NPOV policy, a good indication of vetting/community buy-in.
Line 6: Line 6:
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly>
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly>
| image = [[File:Unbalanced scales.svg|50x40px|link=]]
| image = [[File:Unbalanced scales.svg|50x40px|link=]]
| issue = This article's [[WP:UNDUE#Avoid_sections_and_articles_focusing_on_criticisms_or_controversies|"criticism" or "controversy" section]] '''may compromise the article's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Article structure|neutrality]]'''.
| issue = This article's [[Wikipedia:Criticism#Avoid_sections_and_articles_focusing_on_criticisms_or_controversies|"criticism" or "controversy" section]] '''may compromise the article's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Article structure|neutrality]]'''.
| fix = Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections [[Wikipedia:Consensus|through discussion]] on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].
| fix = Please help rewrite or integrate negative information to other sections [[Wikipedia:Consensus|through discussion]] on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].
| date = {{{date|}}}
| date = {{{date|}}}

Revision as of 17:54, 16 January 2024