honorable mention: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
m add missing From in English etyms, remove stray spaces and L2R markers (manually assisted) |
Mysteryroom (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{en-noun}} |
{{en-noun}} |
||
# {{lb|en|idiomatic}} An [[award]] or recognition given to a person or thing who does not |
# {{lb|en|idiomatic}} An [[award]] or [[recognition]] given to a [[person]] or [[thing]] who does not achieve a higher standing but whose performance or entry was [[noteworthy]]. |
||
#* '''2006''', Patrick Blackburn · Johan Bos · Kristina Striegnitz, [https://web.archive.org/web/20150328054542/http://www.learnprolognow.org/lpnpage.php?pagetype=html&pageid=lpn-htmlse34 ''Learn Prolog Now!''], §8.3 |
#* '''2006''', Patrick Blackburn · Johan Bos · Kristina Striegnitz, [https://web.archive.org/web/20150328054542/http://www.learnprolognow.org/lpnpage.php?pagetype=html&pageid=lpn-htmlse34 ''Learn Prolog Now!''], §8.3 |
||
#*: How good are DCGs from a linguistic perspective? Well, mixed. At one stage (in the early 1980s) they were pretty much state of the art. They made it possible to code complex grammars in a clear way, and to explore the interplay of syntactic and semantic ideas. Certainly any history of parsing in computational linguistics would give DCGs an [[honorable mention|'''honourable mention''']]. |
#*: How good are DCGs from a linguistic perspective? Well, mixed. At one stage (in the early 1980s) they were pretty much state of the art. They made it possible to code complex grammars in a clear way, and to explore the interplay of syntactic and semantic ideas. Certainly any history of parsing in computational linguistics would give DCGs an [[honorable mention|'''honourable mention''']]. |
Latest revision as of 21:32, 3 October 2024
English
[edit]Alternative forms
[edit]Pronunciation
[edit]Audio (General Australian): (file)
Noun
[edit]honorable mention (plural honorable mentions)
- (idiomatic) An award or recognition given to a person or thing who does not achieve a higher standing but whose performance or entry was noteworthy.
- 2006, Patrick Blackburn · Johan Bos · Kristina Striegnitz, Learn Prolog Now!, §8.3
- How good are DCGs from a linguistic perspective? Well, mixed. At one stage (in the early 1980s) they were pretty much state of the art. They made it possible to code complex grammars in a clear way, and to explore the interplay of syntactic and semantic ideas. Certainly any history of parsing in computational linguistics would give DCGs an honourable mention.
- 2006, Patrick Blackburn · Johan Bos · Kristina Striegnitz, Learn Prolog Now!, §8.3
Translations
[edit]award or recognition
|