Emissions Trading and Profit-Neutral Grandfathering

Cameron Hepburn (), John Quah and Robert Ritz

No 295, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper examines the amount of grandfathering needed for an emissions trading scheme (ETS) to have a neutral impact on firm profits. We provide a simple formula to calculate profit-neutral grandfathering in a Cournot model with firms of different sizes and a general demand function. Using this formula, we obtain estimates of profit-neutral grandfathering for the electricity, cement, newsprint and steel industries. Under the current EU ETS, firms obtain close to full grandfathering; we show that while this may still leave some firms worse off, others have probably benefitted substantially. We find no evidence that any industry as a whole could be worse off with full grandfathering. We also show that the common presumption that a higher rate of cost pass-through lowers profit-neutral grandfathering is unreliable

Keywords: Emissions Trading; Emissions Permits; Grandfathering Firm Profits; Cost Pass-Through; Market Structure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D43 H23 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-12-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene, nep-env, nep-pbe and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:91b7cb7b-ad8d-4e63-b8ba-36f4c7d10cb4 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:295

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Pouliquen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).