Surviving Andersonville: The Benefits of Social Networks in POW Camps

No 11825, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Twenty-seven percent of the Union Army prisoners captured July 1863 or later died in captivity. At Andersonville the death rate may have been as high as 40 percent. How did men survive such horrific conditions? Using two independent data sets we find that friends had a statistically significant positive effect on survival probabilities and that the closer the ties between friends as measured by such identifiers as ethnicity, kinship, and the same hometown the bigger the impact of friends on survival probabilities.

JEL-codes: I12 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-net and nep-soc
Note: DAE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published as Dora L. Costa & Matthew E. Kahn, 2007. "Surviving Andersonville: The Benefits of Social Networks in POW Camps," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1467-1487, September.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11825.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Surviving Andersonville: The Benefits of Social Networks in POW Camps (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11825

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11825

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().