Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared
Masahiko Aoki
Governance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research
Abstract:
This essay provides a game-theoretic, endogenous view of institutions, and then applies the idea to identify the sources of institutional trajectories of economic development in China, Japan, and Korea. It stylizes the Malthusian-phase of East Asian economies as peasant-based economies in which small families allocated their working time between farming on small plots— leased or owned—and handcrafting for personal consumption and markets. It then compares institutional arrangements across these economies that sustained otherwise similar economies. It characterizes the varied nature of the political states of Qing China, Tokugawa Japan, and Yi Korea by focusing on the way in which agricultural taxes were enforced. It also identifies different patterns of social norms of trust that were institutional complements to, or substitutes for, political states. Finally, it traces the path-dependent transformations of these state-norm combinations along subsequent transitions to post-Malthusian phases of economic growth in the respective economies.
Keywords: economic development; institutions; China; Japan; Korea; political states; social norms; institutional complements and substitutes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O43 O53 P51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-11
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/23378 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.eaber.org/node/23378 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/23378 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://eaber.org/node/23378)
Related works:
Chapter: Historical sources of institutional trajectories in economic development: China, Japan and Korea compared (2013)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2013)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2012)
Working Paper: Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan, and Korea Compared (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:govern:23378
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Governance Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().