Risky Vote Delegation
Hans Gersbach,
Akaki Mamageishvili and
Manvir Schneider
No 17044, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
Abstract:
We study vote delegation and compare it with conventional voting. Typical examples for vote delegation are validation or governance tasks on blockchains and liquid democracy. There is a majority of "well-behaving" agents, but they may abstain or delegate their vote to other agents since voting is costly. "Misbehaving" agents always vote. Preferences of agents are private information and a positive outcome is achieved if well-behaving agents win. Vote delegation can lead to quite different outcomes than conventional voting. For instance, if the number of misbehaving voters, denoted by f, is high, both voting methods fail to deliver a positive outcome. If the number of misbehaving voters takes an intermediate value, conventional voting delivers a positive outcome, while vote delegation fails with probability one. However, if f is low, we show by numerical simulations that delegation delivers a positive outcome with higher probability than conventional voting. Our results also provide insights in worst-case outcomes that can happen in a liquid democracy.
Keywords: Costly; voting; -; delegation; -; rational; voters; -; governance; -; liquid; democracy; -; blockchain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D71 D72 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17044 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17044
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP17044
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().