Ends versus Means: Kantians, Utilitarians, and Moral Decisions
Roland Benabou,
Armin Falk and
Luca Henkel
No 275, ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany
Abstract:
Choosing what is morally right can be based on the consequences (ends) resulting from the decision – the Consequentialist view – or on the conformity of the means involved with some overarching notion of duty – the Deontological view. Using a series of experiments, we investigate the overall prevalence and the consistency of consequentialist and deontological decision-making, when these two moral principles come into conflict. Our design includes a real-stakes version of the classical trolley dilemma, four novel games that induce ends-versus-means tradeoffs, and a rule-following task. These six main games are supplemented with six classical self-versus-other choice tasks, allowing us to relate consequential/deontological behavior to standard measures of prosociality. Across the six main games, we find a sizeable prevalence (20 to 44%) of non-consequentialist choices by subjects, but no evidence of stable individual preference types across situations. In particular, trolley behavior predicts no other ends-versus-means choices. Instead, which moral principle prevails appears to be context-dependent. In contrast, we find a substantial level of consistency across self-versus-other decisions, but individuals’ degree of prosociality is unrelated to how they choose in ends-versus-means tradeoffs.
Keywords: morality; deontological; consequentialist; Kantian; ends-versus-means; trolley dilemma; prosocial; altruism; social preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D01 D64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 77 pages
Date: 2024-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-hpe, nep-soc and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_275_2024.pdf First version, 2024 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Ends versus Means: Kantians, Utilitarians, and Moral Decision (2024)
Working Paper: Ends versus Means: Kantians, Utilitarians, and Moral Decisions (2024)
Working Paper: Ends versus Means: Kantians, Utilitarians, and Moral Decisions (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:275
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series from University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany Niebuhrstrasse 5, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ECONtribute Office ().