Pigou's Dividend versus Ramsey's Dividend in the Double Dividend Literature

Eduardo Giménez and Miguel Rodriguez

No 12066, Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)

Abstract: This paper deals with the welfare analysis of green tax reforms. The aims of this paper are to highlight misinterpretations of policy assessments in the double dividend literature, to specify which of the efficiency costs and benefits should be ascribed to each dividend, and then, to propose a definition for the first dividend and the second dividend. We found the Pigou's dividend more appropriate for policy guidance, in contrast to the Ramsey's dividend usually found in mainstream literature. Therefore, we take up some authors' recent claims about the need of unambiguous and operative definitions of these dividends both for empirical purposes, and political advice. Finally, the paper analyzes a green tax reform for the US economy to illustrate the advantages of our definitions for policy assessment. The new definitions proposed in this paper i) overcome some shortcoming of the mainstream current definitions in the literature regarding overestimation of the efficiency costs; and, ii) provide information by themselves and not as a partial view of the whole picture.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/12066/files/wp060085.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Pigou's Dividend versus Ramsey's Dividend in the Double Dividend Literature (2006)
Working Paper: Pigou’s Dividend versus Ramsey’s Dividend in the Double Dividend Literature (2006)
Working Paper: PIGOU’S DIVIDEND VERSUS RAMSEY’S DIVIDEND IN THE DOUBLE DIVIDEND LITERATURE
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:feemcc:12066

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.12066

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().