U.S. Farm Policy and the WTO: How Do They Match Up?
Chad Hart and
Bruce Babcock
Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 2002, vol. 03, issue 1, 21
Abstract:
The debate over a new farm bill has focused on how to spend an additional $73.5 billion in funding for the agricultural budget over ten years. The House of Representatives, the Senate Agriculture Committee, and Senators Cochran and Roberts (supported by the Bush Administration) have each proposed a structure for the next farm bill. A critical question becomes whether these proposals conflict with U.S. commitments to limit subsidies under the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreement. This paper explores this issue and concludes with a discussion of the future direction of U.S. farm subsidies and new WTO agreements.
Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23915/files/03010119.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: U.S. Farm Policy and the WTO: How Do They Match Up? (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ecjilt:23915
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23915
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy from Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().