The United Kingdom's Research Assessment Exercise: Impact on Institutions, Departments, Individuals
Paul Hare ()
Higher Education Management and Policy, 2003, vol. 15, issue 2, 43-62
Abstract:
UK universities are publicly funded to carry out teaching and research. Since the mid-1980s, the bulk of the research stream of institutional grants has been allocated on the basis of periodic research assessment exercises, the most recent of which was completed in 2001. The results of RAE2001 will influence institutional grants from 2002-03 onwards. This article explains the RAE system, discusses its advantages and drawbacks, outlines a framework within which it can be analysed, and examines some of the available evidence about the impact of the RAE. The article then concludes that the RAE system as presently operated has outlived its usefulness, and that it should be replaced by an allocation method based on the volume of research grants and contracts attracted to an institution. A short postscript updates the article to take into account the White Paper on higher education that was published in the United Kingdom in January 2003.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v15-art12-en (text/html)
Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:edukaa:5lmqcr2jj1br
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Higher Education Management and Policy from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().