[go: up one dir, main page]

DEV Community

Cover image for Working with conditions & lists in React
Sergio Daniel Xalambrí
Sergio Daniel Xalambrí

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at sergiodxa.com

Working with conditions & lists in React

In a previous article I wrote about how to start a React project using the state and effect hooks, this time we will see how to work with conditions, lists and forms in React.

Conditional Rendering in React

Let's start talking about conditional rendering, multiple times you will need to render something in React based on a condition and if the condition is false render a different thing. To do so we have multiple options.

Using a Normal if

The easiest way is to use a normal if inside our component code and return inside and outside the if.

const Spinner = () => <strong>Loading...</strong>;

function MyComponent({ isLoading }) {
  if (isLoading) return <Spinner />;
  return <main>This is the real content</main>;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In our component if isLoading is true we will return the component <Spinner /> but if isLoading is false we will render the <main> with some text inside.

Switching Only Content Using Ternaries

Another option is to use ternaries directly inside the returned elements. This is specially useful if you want to render some content always and only do the changes in a specific area.

function MyComponent({ isActive }) {
  return (
    <main>
      I'm <strong>{isActive ? "active" : "inactive"}</strong>
    </main>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In this case it will return the <main> and the I'm all the time, inside a strong it will return active or inactive based on the condition, if we don't use JSX we need to return those values as strings inside quotes instead of the text directly, this is because inside the curly brackets we use normal JavaScript code and not JSX.

Switching Elements Tree Using Ternaries

We could also use ternaries to render different elements based on conditions.

const Spinner = () => <strong>Loading...</strong>;

function MyComponent({ isLoading }) {
  return (
    <main>
      <h2>This is my app</h2>
      {isLoading ? <Spinner /> : <article>This is the real content</article>}
    </main>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This is similar to the examples above, we will always have the main and h2 tags but we will render the <Spinner /> if isLoading is true and and article with certain content if isLoading is false. Unlike the previous example we don't need to wrap the content in quotes because we wrote it inside JSX code so we recover that capability as in the h2.

Rendering an Element or Null

There is also another possible case where you need to render an element or nothing, again there are a few options.

Using a Ternary

The first one is using a ternary to render the element or null.

const Spinner = () => <strong>Loading...</strong>;

function MyComponent({ isLoading }) {
  return (
    <main>
      <h2>This is my app</h2>
      {isLoading ? <Spinner /> : null}
      <article>This is the real content</article>
    </main>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In this case if isLoading is true it will render the <Spinner /> but if it's false it will render null. If we use null inside our JSX React will ignore it and avoid rendering in the position.

Using an Implicit Null

We could leverage JavaScript to have implicit null in our JSX, technically is a false which will also be ignored by React but is similar to the example above.

const Spinner = () => <strong>Loading...</strong>;

function MyComponent({ isLoading }) {
  return (
    <main>
      <h2>This is my app</h2>
      {isLoading && <Spinner />}
      <article>This is the real content</article>
    </main>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If isLoading is true JavaScript will execute the next part of the condition where we return <Spinner />, but if isLoading is false it will stop the condition there and return false, the result is similar to the example above but we don't need to use a null there.

Lists in React

Now let's talk about working with list, if we have an array of element we could use Array#map to transform the elements to React elements, before such transformation we could use other array methods such as Array#filter, Array#sort, etc. As far they return a new array we could keep adding more and eventually map to React elements.

function List() {
  const messages = [
    { content: "Lorem", id: 1 },
    { content: "Ipsum", id: 2 },
    { content: "dolor", id: 3 },
    { content: "Sit", id: 4 },
    { content: "Amet", id: 5 }
  ];

  return (
    <ul>
      {messages
        .filter(({ content }) => content[0] !== content[0].toLowerCase())
        .map(message => (
          <li key={message.id}>{message.content}</li>
        ))}
    </ul>
  );
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If we review the example above it's possible to see the prop key which is equal to each message.id, this key is not an attribute of the li tag, it is something we need to define when rendering lists on React.

This key lets React identify each item of the list by some immutable value, the immutable part is specially important, the value should never change and if it does React will treat it as a different element and force a new render.

In case our list is filtered or sorted the key will help React identify each element in their new positions and reduce the DOM updates to the minimum.

Tip: Avoid using the index as key, while it works if the list is filtered or sorted it will cause the key value to change to the new index and React will consider them different elements and repaint the whole list.

Top comments (3)

Collapse
 
gustavofsantos profile image
Gustavo Santos

Particularly I'd avoid using ternary inside jsx. It scales very well and soon your components will be full of ternaries and the mess will be everywhere

Collapse
 
chibiblasphem profile image
Debove Christopher

What do you advise to use then ? Ternary is expression and inside jsx expressions are the only way to do condition

Btw don't tell me to create a function which do the condition, that's really dirty. Well coded the use of ternary does not turn your code a mess.

Note that this is only my opinion

Collapse
 
sergiodxa profile image
Sergio Daniel Xalambrí

I think if you reach the point of having a lot of ternaries or too much nested ternaries, maybe, that component should be split in multiple components because the original one becomes too complex.

But most of the time ternaries are not a problem IMO and you can use them without issues, most probably before you reach the point ternaries are a problem you have another problem and already split the component.