User talk:Trzęsacz

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trzęsacz!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

png <-> jpg are not duplicate

Just a note to say that different file types of the same image are not considered {{Duplicate}} with regard to speedy deletion through deletion policy. — billinghurst sDrewth _jpg_are_not_duplicate" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">08:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cranach

Hello! Huge request to put this image in high resolution.--IgorSokol (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Cranach the Elder Portrait of King Ferdinand I, 1548 http://www.lucascranach.org/object.php?&obj=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A&uid=892&page=4&fol=01_Overall&img=DE_SMS_G2486_FR345A_2013-07_Overall.tif

Can I get a response to the request?--IgorSokol (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's possible to see this image?

Steinbrecher oder Die Steinbrecher ?

Du kennst Dich mit Robert Sterl aus? Weißt Du den genauen Titel des Werkes? Danke --Frze ^{> talk} 11:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die Referenzseite, also die vom Museum, schreibt den Titel so. --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke: 1909 oder 1911? LG --Frze ^{> talk} 11:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warum 1911? --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Sterl - Die Steinbrecher (1911).jpg

--Frze ^{> talk} 12:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Seite sagt 1911. Diese Kunstpostkartenseite hat zwar nur Miniaturbilder, aber sie ist eine der wenigen Seiten mit den vollständigen Grundinformationen zu den Bildern. --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Quermann klärt das sicher auf. Schreibst Du ihm? LG --Frze ^{> talk} 13:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Trzęsacz, ist diese Version nicht besser, wenn auch etwas kleiner? Und hier leicht beschnitten. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, sieht besser aus. Man könnte versuchen, das „große“ Bild zu bearbeiten. Das Flickr-Bild ist auch gut. Vielleicht will der User Frze das drüberladen? --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nö, ich nicht, wenn dann bitte extra neue Datei. Kein wirklicher Mehrwert, nur in der Farbe ein kleiner Unterschied, müsste man mit dem Original abgleichen. Das beschnittene gefällt mir überhaupt nicht, ich mag es ja auch nicht, wenn jemand meine Fotos "beschneidet" im schmerzlichen Wortsinn. LG --Frze ^{> talk} 05:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC) CC: @Oursana[reply]

File:Albrecht Altdorfer - Schlacht bei Issus (Alte Pinakothek, München).jpg

Hallo Trzęsacz,
soeben habe ich Dein Revert bemerkt. Es ist gute Praxis die Informationen zu einem Kunstwerk und dem dieses abbildenden Photo mit {{Category definition: Object}} und {{Object photo}} zu trennen und erleichtert gerade bei Kunstwerken wie der Alexanderschlacht die Wartung ungemein, alles in allem hat sie wohl gegenüber dem Speichern der Informationen je Datei große Vorteile. Der Beschreibung zur betroffenen Datei wurden so schon kleinere Korrekturen zuteil und ich kann auf diese Weise die kleine Angabe zur Entstehungsgeschichte, die zumindest fragwürdig ist, demnächst, wenn ich Zeit dazu finde, einfach abändern, ohne in 71 Dateien editieren zu müssen. Deshalb würde ich die vorherige Fassung gern wiederherstellen, wenn Du nichts dagegen hast!?
Beste Grüße und vielen Dank, --Marsupium (talk) 02:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nein. Meine Bilder sind immer gut und ausreichend beschrieben. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Object photo}} gibt es grade nicht deshalb, damit Deine Bilder „gut und ausreichend beschrieben“ sind, sondern damit die die Objekte gut, ausreichend und einheitlich beschrieben sind und sich bei Bedarf korrigieren lassen, dafür sind Partikularlösungen recht hinderlich. --Marsupium (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Es gibt genug unbeschriebene Bilder wo Du Dich engagieren könntest. --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist unsachlich. --Marsupium (talk) 04:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sterlbilder

File:Robert Sterl - Steinbruch mit Arbeitern.jpg
File:Robert Sterl - Arbeiter im Eisenwerk (Krupp) - 1919.jpg

Hallo Trzęsacz, kannst Du bitte mal schauen? Danke -- Frze ^{> talk} 09:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Angelus^(talk) 22:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have fixed the link of the source. Kind regards. --Angelus^(talk) 22:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 1 day. The reason for the block is Attacks on other people like this and this are not done. Time to cool down a bit. I understand that you are angry but making comments like this and calling other people's work vandalisme is not okey. I hope you understand that and that you can start fresh tomorrow when you are hopefully cooled down (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bruun rasmussen

HELLO! Please provide this image in high resolution. 853/334: George Dawe, style of, first half 19th century: Portrait of Tsar Alexander I of Russia [1] 853/121: Karel van Mander (III), attributed to, 17. century: Portrait of King Christian IV. [2]

25 November 2014. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe now, November 28th, you can place these images?

here and here --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks/

File:The Hunted Slaves by Richard Ansdell 1861.jpg

Hello Trzęsacz. Would you not agree that the above file is a duplicate of File:Richard Ansdell - The Hunted Slaves - Google Art Project.jpg? Green Giant (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Green Giant, the color of both files is many differend. The Google Art Project-file has not nice colours ( its to red). --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then perhaps redirect the Google one to your upload? Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How and why? --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much point having different versions unless the artist painted two versions. Since the difference is more down to software than anything else I think we should only keep the one that is closest to the actual painting. I was intially thinking COM:DUPE might apply but the colours are different so it would probably be a regular deletion under COM:D#Redundant/bad quality. Green Giant (talk) 19:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are paintings in much double and multiple copies at Commons. But this is not a problem. Who knows exactly how the paintings look like in real life? --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, as long as it is just two copies. However, i would appreciate it if you could put a note to link the two files so people will know that they are of the same painiting at least. Green Giant (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My uploaded image has a link. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I must have missed that, thank you anyway. Green Giant (talk) 21:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leonardo da Vinci Virgin of the Rocks (National Gallery London).jpg

Habe mich hier über Dein danken gefreut und Du hast Post. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For longer existing categories, we would generally use the template {{Category redirect}} rather than delete them. This allows the cats to be found in lookups. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know. However, there are at least three artists with this name. Of these, two at Commons; David Cox the elder and David Cox (Junior). Therefore, the category name David Cox (artist) is non-specific. --Trzęsacz (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonhams & dezoomify

Hello! I noticed that you uploaded some images of paintings from the Bonhams site recently. I am wondering, did you use dezoomify on these and if so, what is the base url for the images? I can't get dezoomify to work with Bonhams. Or is there another way to access the full-resolution image? Thank you for all of your uploads, they are wonderful contributions! Thanks for any help! Laura1822 (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Laura1822, Bonhams files are not with dezoomify or other zoom-functions. You must cut the stert from the Image-Url.
example:

http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/18783/lot/119/
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg&width=640&height=480&halign=l0&valign=t0&autosizefit=0
http://images1.bonhams.com/image?src=Images/live/2010-10/13/8189911-2-1.jpg

much fun and greetings, --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I never thought it could be so simply! obviously I forgot to look at the url! Sorry for not responding sooner, haven't been on Commons in a few days. Laura1822 (talk) 19:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Trzęsacz

File:Caspar David Friedrich - Fenster mit Blick auf den Park (ca.1810-11).jpg s. File:Window-Looking-over-the-Park.jpg 🍷🌙 --Oursana (talk) 02:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt sind sie nicht mehr gleich hier. Die Eremitage hat eine neue Webseite und stellt die Bilder jetzt größer ein. Ist aber - glaube ich - noch nicht fertig. Leider verlinken jetzt alle alten Referenzlinks ins Nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast schneller repariert als ich den nächsten aufschreiben konnte.--Oursana (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Es sind jetzt schon erheblich mehr Bilder online als letztens. Das da oben verlinkte Bild ist von hier. So groß findet man sonst nichts. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

smb.museum auf Erwachsene.., bisschen zu spät. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

click 🎅; ich hab Dir gemailt.--Oursana (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guck mal morgen. Hab ihn schon gesehen und empfehle ihn Dir sehr. In B läuft er bestimmt auch. Er gefiel mir viel besser als zum KHM. Ist OmU. Du hörst wirklich gute Bildbesprechungen. Gruß --Oursana (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

und.. ich schreib Dir noch, kann aber Abend werden. --Oursana (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Goubau

Thanks for pointing me to these additional sources. I am still trying to figure out how to make the zoom-thing work. FRAYK (talk) 10:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a beautiful page for many zoom functions for Wikicommons. Maybe you can translate from German. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Kassel

Hello, Trzęsacz! Prompt loading mechanism high resolution pictures from the site http://altemeister.museum-kassel.de. Thank you very much for your help.

Dear Trzęsacz! Recalls its request and ask you to help me. /lois976/ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.120.130.126 (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg

File:Gustaf Wilhelm Palm - Vy över Ariccia (1841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PatHadley (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa Bonheur - Lion (The lock out).jpg

Hi, Trzęsacz, what is the exact description to this file? A lock out it can hardly be, I suggest meant is a Lookout Lotje (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje, thanks for the note. I've corrected the title in „Lion (The look out)“, according to Sotheby's. --Trzęsacz (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joachim Patinier

Hi Trzęsacz, I have created this subcategory with the real name of the artist (Joachim Patinier) to put together works rightly attributed to Joachim Patinier himself. A lot of works in category Patinir are not from him. It's the reason why a have created also subcategories Attribuée à Joachim Patinier (wrong or dubious attribution), Atelier de Joachim Patinier (Joachim Patinier workshop), and Disciple de Joachim Patinier (Follower of Joachim Patinier).

NB : Joachim Patinir is in fact the bad mame : it is the flemish prononciation of Patinier (« fabriquant de patins » in Wallonie).

TG 642 (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TG 642, the right name is Patinir, see Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp nl, fr, en. So please revert your edits and if you have any references you could use Commons:Categories for discussion--Oursana (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trzęsacz, Well, this is a controversy : see Base de données BALaT (Belgian Art Links and Tools) : Dominique Allart, Patinier, Joachim, in Dictionnaire des peintres belges.. Also, two important works of this painter (Le baptême du Christ of the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Wien, inv. 981 and Les tentations de saint Antoine of Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, inv. P 1615.) are signed : « IOACHIM / D. / PATINIER ».

As I told you before Patinir is the flemish (dutch) pronunciation of the wallon (french) word Patinier (maker of "patin"). Your reference in Koninklijk Museum vor Schone Kunsten is Patinir is because Antwerpen (Anvers) is a flemish city. Many referencies of this artist is Patinier : see for exemple Kunsthistorisches Museum of Wien. In fact, countries keep the easiest form of the name to use it easily with the current language they use: Patinir in UK and Spain ; Patinier in France (a widespread family name in northern part of France and in Belgium), Belgium, Austria...

This controversy is not very important (Quentin Metsys in France become Quinten Massys, Metsys, Matsijs or Massijs somewhere else); the big point here was to create a subcategory to put together media of the works realy made by Patinier/Patinir. So, if you don't like subcategory:Joachim Patinier you can change the name of it to Œuvres de l'artiste, or something like this, but please don't remove it. Thank you.

--TG 642 (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Different notations can be found at many old masters. But here at Commons there must be only one category. Category:Joachim Patinier is not a sub cat of Category:Joachim Patinir. It is a duplicate wit a other notation. You can rename or move categories to a other name and one is than a rederict for the other. What to whom I do not care. Maybe Commons:Categories for discussion is the right way. --Trzęsacz (talk) 09:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vincent Willem van Gogh 036.jpg

Hi !

First of all, please be kinder in your comments. Yes I'm sick, I have a bronchitis, thanks for asking, but I will not delete my account for this :)

I think it is better, when we have multiple pictures of the same painting, to have a category for the painting, put all categories such as Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum or Category:Vineyards in art put on the category (since they apply to the object), and on the file, just put the category of the object and categories relevant to the file, such as Category:Google Art Project works by Vincent van Gogh (not applicable in that case).

The advantages I see :

in Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum for instance, the painting appears only once and not four times. It means that when you add sub-categories and files of Category:Paintings by Van Gogh in the Pushkin Museum, you have exactly the number of paintings in Commons.
if someone find a new category applicable to the painting, they have to add it once, in Category:The_Red_Vineyard, and not in every file of Commons about the painting.

Have a nice day :) Léna (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but Category:The Red Vineyard is not a categorie name, it is mess. Get well soon. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Art-students and copyists in the Louvre gallery, Paris (Boston Public Library).jpg

Hi. I removed Category:Boston Public Library collections from that file (along with hundreds of postcards) because it's already in a (not very clearly named) subcategory: Category:Winslow Homer wood engravings‎. There are subcategories for most collections, so no need for hundreds of files redundantly in the parent category. --Junkyardsparkle (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Category:Winslow Homer wood engravings is a single accident, with this name and by the categorization. The category should be called: Wood engravings by Winlow Homer in the Boston Public Library or better Prints by Winlow Homer in the Boston Public Library. However, there are so many pictures. That's a lot of work. Otherwise, you're right about the matter ago. I remove my remove. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustav Jahn - Bergmotiv.jpg

File:Gustav Jahn - Bergmotiv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

156.58.252.19 13:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg

File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Goller - Bildnis Karl V..jpg

File:Christian Goller - Bildnis Karl V..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg

File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National Gallery of Art

Hello! Please, if it is not hard to download these high-resolution images.--IgorSokol (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC) Dyck, Anthony van, Sir Henri II de Lorraine c. 1634 http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.34046.html[reply]

Studio of Justus Sustermans Anonymous Artist Sustermans, Justus Mattias de' Medici c. 1660 http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/Collection/art-object-page.37632.html

Here & here. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Czartoryski Foundation

Hello! I saw that you are also interested the works of Cranach. I hope that it is possible to download the images at the highest resolution. I'm interested in the first three portraits: Sigismund I the Old, Bona Sforza, Sigismund II Augustus--IgorSokol (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC) http://muzeum.czartoryskich.pl/en/node/17954 http://muzeum.czartoryskich.pl/en/node/17954/view/hires[reply]

see here for the images and here fore the big file (16000 x 8555 px). --Trzęsacz (talk) 22:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much and good luck in all affairs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IgorSokol (talk • contribs) 08:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ Bahasa Indonesia . +/−

Your image or other content, File:Christian Goller - Madonna mit Kind unter einem Apfelbaum.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Also: File:Justice with the serpent device - Christian Goller.jpg and File:Lucas Cranach d.J. - Bildnis Karl V.jpg.

If images are deleted as the result of a proper deletion request, there is a reason. If you think the decision was incorrect, use the deletion review process.

But DO NOT simply re-upload the files in question.

Consider this an official warning. If you do it again, your account might be blocked.Rosenzweig τ 17:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van Gogh - Landschaft in der Abenddämmerung.jpeg

Thank you for your letter. I have seen the painting at the "Van Gogh, My Dream Exhibition" in Budapest, 2013. This exhibition showed digital reconstructions of the originals, Obvously this picture was mistakenly rotated in this exbhibition, and I accepted it as real. Now, seeing the original in Madrid I am convinced that it was a mistake. I reverted it again to the right position.

Best--Szilas (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg

Trzęsacz, why did you change the license on File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg from {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1918}} {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} to {{PD-Art|PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=1918}} and remove the link to the Yorck Project's permission statement for their scans of public domain paintings? Unless I've misunderstood something, we don't need to rely on PD-Art for these scans since we have a release for the scans from the Yorck Project. —RP88 (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-1923 is for the USA-license. {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} is nonse / copyfraud. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no complaint with the addition PD-1923, that is fine with me. I was just curious about your removal of the {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} license. If I understand you correctly, you think the text of {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} license tag is misrepresenting the licensing details of the scans donated via Commons:10,000 paintings from Directmedia. Wouldn't the correct solution be to either fix {{PD-Art-YorckProject}} or maybe nominate it for deletion instead of removing it from individual files? —RP88 (talk) 03:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image is public domain anyway. Since the Yorck-project has nothing to do with. --Trzęsacz (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that the source listed at File:Egon_Schiele_005.jpg is wrong? The source field says we got this scan from the Yorck Project. Is that incorrect? If we did get this image from the Yorck project and they've agreed to release their digital reproduction into the public domain, this image is PD even in legal jurisdictions where reproductions of two-dimensional public domain are copyrightable (which is not the case for PD-Art images). —RP88 (talk) 04:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source is completely true. --Trzęsacz (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joos van Cleve

Hi there, I've noticed that you are uploading some files related to Joos van Cleve and you have tools to upgrade the image and remove watermarks. Maybe you'd be interested in modyfying and uploading the file at the following link [3]? More info about the painting - File:Joos van cleve, trittico con adorazione dei magi, 1520 ca. 01.JPG, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghdjgkudfkj (talk • contribs) 10:51, 18. Jan. 2016‎ (UTC)

here is it --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eckersberg4.jpg

File:Eckersberg4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rsteen (talk) 07:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anscheinend Irrtum beim Datei-Upload

Hallo, dir ist anscheinend irgendeine Verwechslung unterlaufen, als Du die Datei hochgeladen hast, die jetzt den Namen File:Antoine Pesne - Porträt des Königs Friedrich Wilhelm I. von Preußen.jpg trägt: Dateiname und sonstige Informationen stimmen mit der angegebenen Quelle überein, nur das Bild selbst nicht. Stattdessen hast Du ein Bild vom noch jungen späteren Fritz Zwo von Preußen hochgeladen, siehe auch File:Friedrich II. of Prussia c. 1736.jpg oder die Google-Bildersuche.

Ich dachte, es sollte dir selbst überlassen werden, wie man da vorgehen soll. Ich persönlich würde eine Löschung und anschließendes Neuanlegen bevorzugen, weiß aber nicht, ob das nicht irgendwelche Admins in den falschen Hals bekommen würden. Wenn Du kein Problem damit hast, könnte auch ich eine Löschung beantragen mit dem Hinweis, dass Du nach Löschung das richtige Bild unter demselben Namen hochladen würdest. --Speravir (Talk) 19:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin einigermaßen verwundert. Ich vermute, daß dieses Bild damals bei Bildindex anstelle des jetzigen war (es hat auch die gleiche Seitenlänge von 1200 px). Ich habs repariert. Danke für die Aufmersamkeit. --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, hab’s schon bemerkt. Nur ist nun die Quellenangabe bei File:Antoine Pesne - Porträt des Kronprinzen Friedrich von Preußen.jpg nicht mehr nachzuverfolgen. Ich hatte ja gedacht, dass Du versehentlich die Version, die derzeit als Referenz angegeben ist, genommen hast, zumal auch sie dieselben Maße hat, Direktlink: Bild in der Royal Collection. Und in der Tat: Nachdem ich beide hier heruntergeladen hatte, besaßen sie dieselbe Größe und ein Dateivergleichsprogramm sagte mir, sie seien identisch. Ich werde daher gleich mal die Quelle ändern. --Speravir (Talk) 23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Es bleibt mir ein Rätsel, wieso dieses Bild an der Stelle hier hochgeladen wurde. Es könnte ja sein, ich hatte mehrere Bilder im upload-Ordner, und habe mich nur vertan. Das bei Royal Collection die Bilder bei 1500 px groß sind, weiß ich jedoch. Ich hätte es also nicht mit 1200 px down geloadet. Wie auch immer, ich habe eine Dupklicatebaustein gesetzt und der Fall ist dann hoffentlich bald erledigt. --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ach so, das andere Bild ist auch von der Royal Collection. Darauf hatte ich gar nicht geachtet. Die womöglich sonst übliche Dateigröße von 1500px stimmt in diesem Fall aber nicht, sieh es dir an. Ansonsten ist es mittlerweile wirklich erledigt. --Speravir (Talk) 19:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Rottenhammer - Venus und Mars (Rijksmuseum).jpg

File:Hans Rottenhammer - Venus und Mars (Rijksmuseum).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trzęsacz, thanks for uploading a version with the original colors. How did you do this? When I download a jpeg from the Rijksmuseum website the colors are usually slightly off. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Vincent Steenberg, both images have the same color values. But they appear different in Mozilla. On the colors I have not changed. I have transferred the background information of the smaller image into the larger image (see also exif-dada). regards --Trzęsacz (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I didn't know this was possible. This might open new doors. Fæ, did you know about this? Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The question is, what is the right color. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming its the one which is less pale and less greyish. But I've stumbled onto another pair like this: File:Bacchus en Diana Rijksmuseum SK-A-17.jpeg and File:Hendrick van Balen (I) 001.jpg. The first is higher in resolution, but the second seems to have a complete color profile. I understand you're saying that its possible to transfer (part of) the metadata from the first to the second file? If you have a moment would you be willing to explain how this is done? For example, what software do I use? I've aleady tried editing the second file through "properties", but without result. Thanks. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For this I use the Stone Age program „Paint“. I open the small image with „Paint“ and copy & paste the large size image in the page. Save and ready. Check it in the above-linked images. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, genius! That works brilliantly. You made my day. No, you made my week. Thanks a lot! Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Brueghel the Younger - Dorpsbewoners op het ijs.jpg

Toll, wie hast Du es angestellt, die Version im Maximalzoom herunterzuladen? Ich hatte mir das angesehen und nicht geschafft. Und toll auch, dass Du wusstest, dass es im Creator-Template ein „formerly attributed to“ gibt – es gibt immer wieder etwas Neues zu erfahren. — Speravir_Talk – 17:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild wird rausgeschossen mittels eines speziellen tools. Trzęsacz (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hört das spezielle Tool auf den Namen Zoomify? Wenn ja, dann habe ich mich wohl zu doof angestellt. — Speravir_Talk – 21:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dante Gabriel Rossetti - La Castagnetta.jpg

Hi! I think this is a mistake: source is not Christie's (it's Rossetti Archive), but painting was sold at Christie's in 1892 (see "Object history" or source). --Micione (talk) 02:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I now. But [[Category:Sold at Christie's]] is only for the source template {{christies online|ID=...}}. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know, but Category:Images from Christie's is only for files from the Christie's website. It seems to me that my mistake is more acceptable of your :) --Micione (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not invent the category name. It just is. --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not understand. --Micione (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apropos Christie's-images (and other zoom files): You're doing good uploads, and describes your images also nice. Maybe you can read a little bit German language, so here's my tip: . this is a site for zoom uploads. To first you must install Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic 2.8 in your mozilla firefox for shooting the tile images. The other is simple, I think, you come to understand well. greatings --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read German language but I think I understood equally. Maybe I will do it. Thanks and greetings to you! --Micione (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Micione and Trzęsacz, there is in English also Help:Zoomable images. It’s not the same content, though. — Speravir_Talk – 21:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speravir, ok, thank you! (Notification not worked...) --Micione (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

cdf

Filmchen und.. Gruß--Oursana (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruun Rasmussen

Hello! Huge please download these pictures in high quality--IgorSokol (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1621/53: Painter unknown, 17th - 18th century: Portrait of King Frederik III. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=2&iid=300838556&cid=453&mode=detail

865/125: Karel van Mander (III), style of, 17th century: Portrait of Christian IV. http://www.bruun-rasmussen.dk/search.do?pg=6&iid=300838547&cid=453&mode=detail

I have they on my PC. I will upload after the auctions in the end of mai. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understood. Thank you--IgorSokol (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

here and here. --Trzęsacz (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My request has lost its relevance. I figured out how to download. All the best--IgorSokol (talk) 11:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zoomify

Hi! Thanks again for Zoomify, but I have a problem: can you take these images, please? --Micione (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can not make it. Perhaps you ask here again? greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Micione, here and here an exemple. The number inside the URL is the Object-number (accession number) from the Museum web site. have lots of fun with it and greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! You're great! Thank you very much und danke! :-) --Micione (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikutowski, Wilde Fahrt - Wild trip, 1855.jpg

File:Nikutowski, Wilde Fahrt - Wild trip, 1855.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kati Kreutzner (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werkstatt von Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Porträt des Philip Melanchton.jpg

File:Werkstatt von Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Porträt des Philip Melanchton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 07:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Johann der Beständige, Kurfürst von Sachsen (Winnipeg Art Gallery).jpg

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Johann der Beständige, Kurfürst von Sachsen (Winnipeg Art Gallery).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ven1127 (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi,

I would like to ask if it is possible to post this works

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/edouard-manet-the-execution-of-emperor-maximilian-of-mexico-june-19-1867

https://www.sfmoma.org/artwork/35.4516

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-dead-christ-and-three-mourners/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-marriage-of-the-virgin/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/human-flood/?frompage=altissima

http://pinacotecabrera.org/en/collezione-online/opere/the-virgin-with-child-angels-and-saints/?frompage=altissima

http://focus.louvre.fr/en/mona-lisa

I don't know how to save them to my computer =(

Help me please.

Excuse my English ___________Danielguidoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielguidoc (talk • contribs) 11:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the site of pinacotecabrera.org has lower left a little window with the button "Download hi-res Image"
the image from the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art is copyrighted in the USA (painting created 1935)
the other I must see later. greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HAMPEL

Hello!

Maybe you can upload these two portraits Separately in large size.

1) BILDNIS DES KURFÜRSTEN MAXIMILIAN III JOSEPH VON BAYERN

2) BILDNIS MARIA ANNA SOPHIA VON SACHSEN (two separate portraits of the largest size)

https://www.hampel-auctions.com/o/Sueddeutscher-Maler-des-18-Jahrhunderts.html?a=111&s=553&id=637&acl=1110892

Thank you in advance--IgorSokol (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Madame et Monsieur. --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can not save images in this form. Please convert, for example, to jpg format--IgorSokol (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must install the Add-on Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic 2.8 in your web browser (possibly only Mozilla). With this tool you can saving the files with one click. greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks--IgorSokol (talk) 11:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of seascapes

Hello Trzęsacz. You have made a number of edits that add the category "Oil paintings of seascapes". Adding categories is normally a good thing, but in this case it is perhaps not necessary. On the page Category talk:Marine art I have tried to explain the categorization of marine paintings and seascapes, although I am certainly not an expert on this matter. As you can read there, it is recommended to use the "seascape" category only for paintings that primarily shows the sea. Paintings that show unspecified vessels are just "marine paintings", and paintings that show specified ships should go into the categories for those ships or ship types. It is all "marine art", but by your definition every single oil painting with water in it would seem to end up in "Oil paintings of seascapes", which appears to be redundant categorization. You may not agree, but perhaps you were not aware of these guidelines. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean. But which pictures do you mean specifically? greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 22:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it on this one. The existing categories define it as an oil painting and a marine painting. I do not think it is a typical seascape, because there is a named ship in the center, and the painting is named after that ship. But that is just my personal opinion, yours may differ. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 10:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. This is a ship with a well-known name. But sometimes ships are also just staffage in a seascape painting, just as a figure in a landscape painting makes this not equal to a portrait painting. For example, the paintings by Max Jensen are all seascapes, the ships are only staffage. I also have a question; What is an ‚oil marine‘? greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on Max Jensen. It would make sense to make a subcategory of seascapes by him - with link to the main "marine" category. The "oil marine" might as well be "marine oil" paintings. It is just to specify that the work is an oil painting. A lot of the ship paintings are made in watercolour and ink and a lot others are not specified. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsteen: I don't see anything coherent in your work with Max Jensen. Laying down your ideas as if they were policy or guidelines is misleading, especially when you cant duplicate it yourself. Just more needless difussion. Cheers. Broichmore (talk) 17:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Broichmore: You are quite right, there is no coherent work on my part with Max Jensen, just a number of uploads. The uploads are my primary work here on Commons, and the categorization work is a distant second - and Jensen has not yet been part of that. It does not seem quite fair of you to write Laying down your ideas as if they were policy or guidelines is misleading, as there is a distinct disclaimer to my comments, with the words This is not an attempt to create policy on Commons, just a few tips to avoid cluttering of files and to prevent art from disappearing into "unexpected" categories. I felt that the tips were relevant in 2016 - and that they still are - because Commons has a steady stream of new users, who are prone to make edits that are not quite optimal, similar to those we made ourselves, when we started out. You and I may not agree on the "diffusion" part, but still, thanks for your interest. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chess Game

Hello Trzęsacz, As regards your reversion of the 'Chess Game' category. I do not have any argument about the name of the painting, but am sorry that you undid all the work of organizing 4 copies of the same picture into one category, so that it is clear that they are all images of a single painting. Would you consider creating a new category, with a name that you like, and then putting the paintings into this category? with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daderot, there are two different paintings (Nationalgalerie Berlin & Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum Hannover). A category name ist not anything „with a name that I like“. The paintings name are „Chess game“. Your cat name was „Chess Players by Johann Erdmann Hummel“. It would be correct then „Chess Game by Johann Erdmann Hummel“ or possibly „Chess Games by Johann Erdmann Hummel“. However, the oeuvre of Erdmann Hummel here at commons is very surly and the category is well sorted. Therefore, I find that subcategories are unnecessary. greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 17:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Thoma - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (1879).jpg

File:Hans Thoma - Die Flucht nach Ägypten (1879).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

62.91.10.207 10:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vincent van Gogh - Boerderij in de Provence.jpg

File:Vincent van Gogh - Boerderij in de Provence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Empty date

Hi Trz, in many of your uploads i find an empty date as for example in File:Emilie Preyer - Stillleben mit Trauben und Pfirsichen.jpg. Where does that come from? --Arnd (talk) 17:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know any dates for these paintings. The date template comes from my artwork description template. What is the problem with the emty dates? --Trzęsacz (talk) 23:22, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just try to keep the things clean here. For {{Artwork}} and other {{Information}} templates you do not lead to explicitely call the {{Date}} template because this is already done implicitely. So just add the date in the right format (ISO 8601) and it will be displayed correctly. For more complex dates there is a template called {{Complex date}}. Don't wonder when i soon delete the empty date template as mentioned above. --Arnd (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Some of your cleanup deleted dates, like this: [4]. Don't know if this you can remember other examples to repair. --Arnd (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Girl at Sewing Machine by Edward Hopper.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^☎ 17:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories:Antonio de Simone (I) and :Antonio de Simone (II)

Hi, I am currently making a study of the de Simone family. I noticed you made these two categories, could you please tell me, why? What is the rationale behind (difference between) them? Broichmore (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Father and son; see also here. greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are the defining differences between the two Antonios's?

As far as I can remember, only the signature. Antonio II signs at an angle.--Trzęsacz (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How does Tommaso fit into the family? Is he related. Is there a biography somewhere? Do you know any facts?

Maybe this. Possibly he is the father of Antonio II. --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for being asinine! What are you saying? Antonio II is the son of Tomasso and signs on an angle. Antonio I is the grandson and signs straight. Just as a double check. Which of the Antonio's is the better painter, and who is the more prolific of the two? Best regards. Broichmore (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For Antonio (I) is here a long artwork list with paintings of the 19tn-century. Antonio (II) painting are from early 20th-century. He painted modern steam yachts before Vesuvius.
I do not know who his father or son or grandson or what. My modest opinion is; Antonio (I) is the better painter, but everything has its value in its time. --Trzęsacz (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've been searching the internet for two days, and not found some of the stuff you have indicated to me. Things make more sense now. I'll do some more work on this and get back to you. I would be grateful if you would check my work. Important to get this one right, I think. Broichmore (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Where can I find your work? --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed whatever under the three catalog artist names. On the same topic, please take a look at this. Do you agree it's Antonio II? Front view, signed and Back view, with another signature? Broichmore (talk) 18:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's another artist of the same name. Antonio de Simone is very common in Italy. Look at facebook or similar. Greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know its very common. I am trying to find something on their family tree, without success. Do you know any detail? Wives names, actual birth and death places, brother, sister names? Anything specific? Broichmore (talk) 19:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

question

Hello! How can I get a full-size image from this site (Bridgman Art Library)? Your file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Teniers_(II)_-_Archduke_Leopold_Wilhelm_in_his_Picture_Gallery_at_Brussels.jpg I hope for an answer and all the best--IgorSokol (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overwriting artworks

Hi Trzęsacz, please don't overwrite artworks like you did at File:Eilif Peterssen - Kalle Løchen, 1885.jpg. The only acceptable overwrite case is if the same photo of the same artwork from the same source gets published with a higher resolutions. If it's not the same photo or not the same source, you should upload it under a different filename. See Commons:Overwriting existing files for more information. Thanks for your contributions, Multichill (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Gallery in Prague

Hello!

Can not download this image:

http://sbirky.ngprague.cz/dielo/CZE:NG.O_84

Probably, the photo is very large for the possibility of my computer. If not difficult, please upload this photo--IgorSokol (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can download the picture with 5000 px. Click not zoom-button, click stahnout (download)-button. The rest goes by itself. greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 08:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The size that can be downloaded 2935x5000 pixels is a small image size in this case. Because I need a large fragment of the picture with a portrait of the emperor. I could not download a photo with the option ZOOM, where the image is larger, the download seems to be coming, but the picture does not appear. It's possible that this program (Dezoomify) can not cope with the download--IgorSokol (talk) 15:38, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

here is it. --Trzęsacz (talk) 09:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much--IgorSokol (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by George de Forest Brush

Hi Trzęsacz - I'm sorry if I annoyed you with my categorizations of paintings by George de Forest Brush. That was certainly not my intent, nor did I intend vandalism. Instead, I was putting multiple photographs of the same painting together in one category for a given painting. Certainly I don't feel strongly about this, and again, my apologies if I annoyed you. with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wassily Kandinsky - Porträt Nina Kandinsky (1917).jpg

File:Wassily Kandinsky - Porträt Nina Kandinsky (1917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Webaugust (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brooklyn Museum - All Talk and No Work - Francis William Edmonds - overall.jpg

Hi, Trzęsacz. The file was overcategorized; all its categories were accessible through category:All Talk and No Work by Francis William Edmonds and I removed them. Please read more about that in COM:OVERCAT. I will redo the edit and please do not revert me that time. Taivo (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello! I saw on your download page a few large images with a link to this site. Maybe, perhaps, to get these images in high resolution (large size)?

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30415 Porträt Kurfürst Wilhelm I. von Hessen-Kassel, 1817

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30566 Porträt Joachim Murat, 1806-1808

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30657 Porträt Paolina und Camillo Borghese

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30659 Porträt König Jérôme von Westphalen (Kopie nach Kinson), 1808-1812

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30654 Porträt König Joseph von Spanien

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=30655 Porträt König Jérôme im Krönungsornat 1810-1811

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=31003 Porträt Kurfürst Wilhelm II. von Hessen-Kassel, 1835

http://malerei19jh.museum-kassel.de/show.html?id=31070 Porträt Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm I. von Hessen-Kassel, 1840-1850

Thank you in advance--IgorSokol (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Send me an e-mail. --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trzęsacz! Thank you for responding. Unfortunately your e-mail which I know more does not work. I will wait for an answer. Respect--IgorSokol (talk) 17:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, try it again. It should work now. --Trzęsacz (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i forgot. Now I have sent the pictures. Have fun and greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 22:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thank you for all the auto definition images you uploaded I would like to ask a favor Is it possible for you to put these images here? Unfortunately I can't save images in high quality like this If you could teach me through recording screen I would be eternally grateful My email is fabaodob@gmail.com

https://guernica.museoreinasofia.es/gigapixel/en/#3/63.11/-120.59 - Picasso paintings are not free

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1945.24 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1978.45 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1958.45 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1985.57 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1958.43 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1975.2 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1954.865 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1969.22 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1932.719 -"-

https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1958.12 -"-

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1980.05.D

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1975.06.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1976.09.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/detail/M.1974.17.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/P.1978.6

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/F.1969.38.10.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1970.5.16.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1976.08.P

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/la-fornarina/ file:Raffaello Sanzio - La Fornarina (ca. 1519-1520).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/narcissus/ file:Caravaggio - Narciso (1597-1599).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/judith-beheading-holofernes/ file:Caravaggio - Giuditta e Oloferne (ca. 1599).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/madonna-advocata/ file:Anonimo (11. secolo) - Madonna advocata.jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/the-mystic-marriage-of-saint-catherine-with-saints/ file:Lorenzo Lotto - Matrimonio mistico di Santa Caterina e santi (1524).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/triptych-ascension-last-judgment-pentecost/ file:Beato Angelico - Trittico (Galleria Corsini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/veiled-woman-the-vestal-virgin-tuccia/ Three-dimensional plastic is not free

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/saint-sebastian-healed-by-angels/ file:Peter Paul Rubens - De Heilige Sebastiaan (Galleria Corsini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/saint-john-the-baptist/ file:Caravaggio - San Giovanni Battista (Galleria Corsini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/venus-and-adonis/ file:José de Ribera - Venus y Adonis (1637).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/madonna-and-child-with-saints/ file:Giovanni da Milano - Polittico con Madonna con Bambino (ca. 1355).jpg, file:The Virgin and Child enthroned, with angels, saints and evangelical scenes. Rome, Galleria Corsini с.1355.jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/the-tribute-money/ file:Mattia Preti - Il tributo della moneta (1638-1642).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/portrait-of-stefano-iv-colonna/ file:Angelo Bronzino - Ritratto di Stefano IV Colonna (1546).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/episodes-of-the-passion-of-christ/ file:Giovanni Baronzio - Storie della Passione di Cristo (Palazzo Barberini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/the-denial-of-saint-peter/ file:Jusepe de Ribera - La negación de San Pedro.jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/adoration-of-the-shepherds-2/ file:El Greco - La Adoración de los pastores (Palazzo Barberini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/baptism-of-christ-2/ file:El Greco - Bautismo de Cristo (Palazzo Barberini).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/saint-francis-in-meditation/ file:Caravaggio - San Francesco in meditazione (1606-1607).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/the-elegant-snack/ file:Christian Berentz - Der elegante Snack (1717).jpg

https://www.barberinicorsini.org/en/opera/virgin-with-the-child-and-infant-saint-john-the-baptist/ file:Domenico Beccafumi - Madonna con il Bambino e San Giovannino (Palazzo Barberini).jpg

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/M.1972.2.P

https://www.nortonsimon.org/art/viewer/F.1978.01.P Fabaodob (talk) 06:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for helping me

can I ask you one more favor?

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/adoration-of-the-magi-gentile-di-niccolo-di-giovanni-gentile-da-fabriano This one first PLEASE

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/piero-di-cosimo-immaculate-conception-with-six-saints

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/last-supper-leonardo-da-vinci

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/adoration-of-the-magi-after-restoration-leonardo-da-vinci

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/annunciation-leonardo-da-vinci

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/image-bank/sandro-botticelli-primavera-1482-1485/

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/adoration-of-the-magi-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/portrait-of-man-wearing-a-medal-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/sacra-conversazione-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/valle-romita-polyptych-gentile-di-niccolo-di-giovanni-gentile-da-fabriano

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/calumny-of-apelles-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/pala-del-trebbio-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/madonna-of-the-rosebush-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/pala-di-san-barnaba-sandro-botticelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/image-bank/?mixed=Giovanni+da+Fiesole+%28Beato+Angelico%29 All the paintings by fran angelico

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-apocalypse-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-sermon-and-punishment-of-the-antichrist-luca-signorelli-1

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-the-damned-being-plunged-into-hell-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-the-elect-being-called-to-paradise-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-sermon-and-punishment-of-the-antichrist-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-resurrection-of-the-flesh-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/san-brizio-chapel-ascent-to-paradise-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/work/flagellazione-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/viewer/opera/madonna-in-trono-con-il-bambino-e-i-santi-giacomo-maggiore-simone-francesco-dassisi-e-bonaventura-luca-signorelli

https://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/image-bank/?mixed=Giotto+Di+Bondone All by giotto Fabaodob (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Serres (circle of) - Battle of the Nile 1798.jpg

File:Thomas Serres (circle of) - Battle of the Nile 1798.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

86.183.166.167 20:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What to do with superseded files

Hi Trzęsacz. I can see that you have reverted some of my edits on the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Die_Seeschlacht_bei_Lissa.jpg I am sure you have a reason for that, and would like to hear it. As I see it, the process of superseding files saves us the trouble of applying to delete those files. There is typically nothing wrong with them apart from the fact that there is now a better file available. To avoid having the old files cluttering categories, I delete those categories from the files - but you reverted that. Why? --Rsteen (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file was not categorized. The suspended template does not mean anything, because the picture is linked in many Wikipedia articles. Better, you make a duplicate request. I think the links to the Wikipedias are then redirected automatically. Trzęsacz (talk) 02:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your swift answer. The file was still categorized, but only as "Superseded". You do not need the other categories, because they are present in the new file, linked to in the superseded one. The fact that the old file may still be used in some wikipedia articles is exactly why I think it is a better idea to supesede than to start a deletion request. Same thing for the "Duplicate" method. But if you continue to revert this kind of edits, maybe the deletion/duplicate road should be followed after all. Hope you agree that we do not want the categories cluttered with near-identical files. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 05:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baroque paintings

Hi, I removed the category because all the "Paintings by Jan van Goyen" are included in the category Baroque paintings, so it's better not to put a page in a category and also in a more general category. Regards,--Carlodell (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(-: --Trzęsacz (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Auction results

Hi Trzęsacz. I seem to have made an error by stating the auction result of the file File:Peder Mønsted - Lyng bakker ved Silkeborgh.jpg. Could you please point me in the direction of the policy on Commons that states that such results are not permissible? Or is it just a policy of your own? I was under the impression that any information is good information, but you - or Commons - seem to differ? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trzęsacz. How diffucult can it be to make a link to the Commons policy that says "We do not want auction results in the file descriptions"? Or maybe there is no such policy? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 06:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trzęsacz. After three weeks with no response it feels more safe to conclude that there is actually no policy on Commons that forbids information about auctions results. The information you removed has been restored. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Art UK

Please do not use Template:BBCYourPaintings it is deprecated. Use Template:Art UK instead. -- GreenC (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many pictures are from BBC Your Painting and not from ArtUK. The claim that ArtUK is the source is a lie. It's not always the same pictures. Some are now available in other formats., My link points out. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please abide by the consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:BBCYourPaintings. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BBC Your Paintings

Template:BBC Your Paintings is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:BBCYourPaintings

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sortorder for Danish artists

Hi Trzęsacz. You have begun to change the sortorder for Danish artists, or at least for Carl Bøgh. You write in your edit "by sort use not special characters or special letters, only the Latin nominate form". Could you point me to the guideline that says that the w:Danish and Norwegian alphabet is not a latin alphabet, and that our sortorder is not valid? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 04:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is. But I have to look for it first. This is true not only for Nordic languages, but for all. Likewise for the German ä, ö, ü. For example, Dürer is always sorted Durer. Greetings Trzęsacz (talk) 04:33, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems odd that a list of Danish painters can not be sorted according to our alphabet - and likewise for the other Nordic countries. But of course, it there is such a rule, it must be followed. Hope you find it soon - and thanks for some great uploads. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 04:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If the rule is so hard to find, maybe we could just use the Nordic alphabets when sorting Nordic arists? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 18:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have commissioned the search but have not received a message yet.
One could also sort Russian pictures in Cyrillic, and Jewish in Hebrew and so on. But Wikimedia is an international project and English is the language that unites everything. Trzęsacz (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The comparison with Russian and Jewish alphabets seems rather far-fetched. We are talkin about latin alphabets with the letters Æ, Ø and Å added at the end - and Commons sorts them correctly. As long as there is no explicit rule, I think you should just let us sort Nordic artists according to our alphabet. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 11:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this is not true. Trzęsacz (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You need to be a bit more specific. If you need examples of correct sorting of nordic letters on Commons, they are available - or is it something else? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 06:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl Witkowski - Boy with Apple.jpg

File:Karl Witkowski - Boy with Apple.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mopialex (talk) 17:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lehmann" Ducks

Thank you for catching that. I'm glad I didn't use it in the article. WQUlrich (talk) 21:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maler Johann Seits

Hallo, du hast die Category:Johann Seits angelegt. Kannst du betreffend die Lebensdaten dieser Person und der anscheinend nun erforderlichen Löschanträge für die Bilder der Gemälde etwas beitragen? Siehe diese und diese Diskussion. --Eweht (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ursprünglich dachte ich, es handele sich um zwei verschiedene Personen gleichen Namens. Ich habe dann verschiedene Sachen im Netz gelesen, durch die ich zu der Überzeugung kam, daß es sich um ein und dieselbe Person handelt, worauf ich keine weiteren uploads mehr getätigt habe. Am meisten hat mich eine für den Maler typische Signatur aus den 1950ern überzeugt. Das ein Löschantrag irgendwann kommen würde, war mir klar. Ich habe nichts gegen die Löschung der Bilder bzw. ich kann dagegen nichts einwenden. Trzęsacz (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Ansicht von Dubrovnik.jpg

File:Johann Seits - Ansicht von Dubrovnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

95.223.238.102 14:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Boys swimming at Dubrovnik.jpg

File:Johann Seits - Boys swimming at Dubrovnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

95.223.238.102 14:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Einlaufender Dampfer (1923).jpg

File:Johann Seits - Einlaufender Dampfer (1923).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Aufkreuzende Schonerbark (1923).jpg

File:Johann Seits - Aufkreuzende Schonerbark (1923).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Küste bei Dubrovnik.jpg

File:Johann Seits - Küste bei Dubrovnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Nourmahal off the Coast of Dalmatia.jpg

File:Johann Seits - Nourmahal off the Coast of Dalmatia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Madonna della Mljet.jpg

File:Johann Seits - Madonna della Mljet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johann Seits - Blick auf Dubrovnik (1924).jpg

File:Johann Seits - Blick auf Dubrovnik (1924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Artmax (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Botticelli - Madonna Adoring the Child with Five Angels (Baltimore Museum of Art).png

File:Botticelli - Madonna Adoring the Child with Five Angels (Baltimore Museum of Art).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Иван К. Айвазовский - От Млеты до Гудаури (1868).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Иван К. Айвазовский - От Млеты до Гудаури (1868).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Size of an image

Can I ask you how you managed to get this file File:John Thomas Serres - H.M.S. Britannia passing Mt. Edgcumbe in Plymouth Sound.jpg from the source at 1.12mb in size, I can only get it at 442kb. It would help me to know how?

On the other hand the 1.12 mb version may have been withdrawn and no longer available?

Many thanks. Broichmore (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the past you couldn't just download Christie's pictures in large format. You had to zoom off with a special tool and then shoot them out. The MB-size of the picture was different. The download was most in PNG-Format. In the current version of Christie's I have the same as you (442kb). greeting --Trzęsacz (talk) 01:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS.: I checked my archive. I download the picture on March 21, 2016, so definitely using the old mode.

still large--Oursana (talk) 18:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If ever we find a way of getting 1.12mb in size, please let me know. What was the "special tool" by the way? Broichmore (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "special tool" was https://zoomable-images.toolforge.org/zoomify.php?path=http://www.christies.com/lotfinderimages/d59155/d5915550&zoom=4, but now no more functionable and Pearl Crescent Page Saver Basic 2.8. --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Karel Vítězslav Mašek - Slavnost jara (1889).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karel Vítězslav Mašek - Slavnost jara (1889).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Adam and Eve (KMSKA).jpg

Copyright status: File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Adam and Eve (KMSKA).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Adam and Eve (KMSKA).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works_by_Franz_Bunke

Works by Franz Bunke has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RKD

I wonder how to download a high resolution image from this site: https://rkd.nl/images/304979 To download this high-resolution image, I was asked to register on the site. But after registration this function did not appear. It turns out to be a hoax or I didn’t understand something. Please explain if possible. IgorSokol (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to register. Try it out, I don't do anything else Trzęsacz (talk) 01:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image of Oliver Cromwell in particular can only be downloaded in a small size. But you can download it larger at the National Portrait Gallery, London. Trzęsacz (talk) 01:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer.

But there was an inscription: “to download this image in high resolution, log in as a subscriber” and I decided that registration was needed.

When I registered and logged in, the sign disappeared.

As for the London Portrait Gallery, there is no large increase in the image. You can get photographs, but they will be very low resolution.

Here are some examples:

https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw00883/George-Villiers-2nd-Duke-of-Buckingham

https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait.php?search=ap&npgno=647&eDate=&lDate=

https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait.php?search=ap&npgno=593

Maybe you know how to get big photos? IgorSokol (talk) 15:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste these url's into https://dezoomify.ophir.dev/ and you will have large images. Trzęsacz (talk) 18:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I use dezoomify.

But the problem is that 1500 pixels in photo height is a very low resolution. High resolution starts from 5000 pixels, and if the portrait is full-length, then twice as much.

This museum has never done a good enlargement at all. Previously, the enlargement was 2400 pixels across the width of the photo, but when these images hit Wiki, they made the photos even smaller. IgorSokol (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Trzęsacz

Autopatrol given

png <-> jpg are not duplicate

Cranach

Steinbrecher oder Die Steinbrecher ?

Sterlbilder

File source is not properly indicated: File:Virgin of the Rocks (Louvre).jpg

Your account has been blocked

bruun rasmussen

Bonhams & dezoomify

Hallo Trzęsacz

Anton Goubau

Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Kassel

Joachim Patinier

National Gallery of Art

Czartoryski Foundation

Please do not recreate deleted content

File:Van Gogh - Landschaft in der Abenddämmerung.jpeg

Joos van Cleve

Anscheinend Irrtum beim Datei-Upload

File:Dante Gabriel Rossetti - La Castagnetta.jpg

cdf

Bruun Rasmussen

Zoomify

Categories

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Help

HAMPEL

Definition of seascapes

Chess Game

Empty date

Notification about possible deletion

Categories:Antonio de Simone (I) and :Antonio de Simone (II)

question

Overwriting artworks

National Gallery in Prague

Paintings by George de Forest Brush

Request

What to do with superseded files

Category:Baroque paintings

Auction results

Art UK

Sortorder for Danish artists

"Lehmann" Ducks

Maler Johann Seits

FP Promotion

Size of an image

FP Promotion

Copyright status: File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. - Adam and Eve (KMSKA).jpg

RKD

Navigation menu

Search