[go: up one dir, main page]

/discussioni vecchie

/discussioni vecchie2

user agreements

edit

Thank you for your quick response! This whole copyright thing drives me nuts. So, you are telling me that I may use the photographs of the coins as long as I attribute each one to Classical Numismatic Group? And it's OK to use them that way in a published book?

Nancy

Changing category

edit

Re:Filippo Costa

edit

Ciao, ho eliminato la segnalazione. Su Commons dimentichi l'idioma natio? ;)--Caulfield (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

No Caulfield, quello nun lo dimentico, me possino cecamme. Quello che nun m'aricordo bene è quello che cianno fatto studia' a scola. --Carlomorino (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re

edit

Perfetto, elimina la segnalazione. Ocio nella categorizzazione, ho impiegato anni a sistemare le categorie di politica italiana... thx--Caulfield (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Caufield: Sto cercando di caricare tutte le foto dei senatori "regnicoli" che ancora mancano all'appello. Prima faccio la categoria e poi carico la foto. Se hai consigli, fammi sapere.
Carlomorino (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perché la l mi viene persa così spesse volte? A parte ciò, la categoria dovrebbe teoricamente essere creata per almeno 2 immagini, altrimenti non avrebbe senso di esistere a sè stante. Se preferisci così, in modo da avere con wikidata le prime informazioni automatiche, ricordati che per i politici devi specificare il genere, male o female, e se regnicoli, ovviamente tutti maschi, che sono del Regno d'Italia o di Sardegna con l'apposita categoria. Ciao --Caulfield (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:George II Guinea 651291.jpg

edit
 
File:George II Guinea 651291.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : HReuter.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Stuiver

edit
Category discussion warning 

Stuiver has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 12:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply