User talk:Alan/Archivos/2013 05

File:Plebejus pylaon philbyi 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gidip (talk) 22:19, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is a redirection generated after rename. --Alan Lorenzo ^(talk) 22:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Redirects such as this cause the image to appear in wrong articles. There is no reason to leave the redirect of a misleading name, especially when there are no links to that page. Could you please delete it. Thank you in advance. Gidip (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thx for the renaming ! --Zeugma fr (talk) 22:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Alan.lorenzo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Muchas gracias!--F Ceragioli (talk) 16:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Eso veo, casi todas las imagenes estan siendo restauradas pero todavía tienen el cartel rojo que dice violan los derechos de autor.

Entonces cada vez que suba una imagen tendré que recurrir a ti para que le ponga el ticket OTRS?.--Inefable001 (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Al haber sido restauradas tengo que quitarlo y marcarlas por buenas. --Alan ^(talk) 15:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Se han restaurado fotos desde el 2010 hasta hoy y las que lo necesitaban han sido marcadas con el permiso. Las anteriores deberás volver a subirlas debido a su antigüedad.

Para acelerar todo, sives que me he olvidado alguna dímelo y las que subas que sean de esa web márcalas con {{OTRS pending}} y me avisas por aquí para que directamente les ponga el definitivo. Saludos. --Alan ^(talk) 16:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, así lo haré. Te aclaro que algunas fotos que han restaurado no son de la página sino que han sido trasladada por mi desde Wikipedia en inglés con su permiso correspondiente según la persona que la subió allá.--Inefable001 (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Se han restaurado masivamente, ahora estoy revisando para volver a eliminar, ya que en base al permiso de OTRS solo se pueden mantener las de la web en cuestión. --Alan ^(talk) 16:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

En teoría ya está. Dime si ves algún error. --Alan ^(talk) 17:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hasta ahora todo está bien, si veo cualquier error te aviso.

Hace par de días envié una solicitud a otra persona propietaria de una web de fotos y estoy en espera de su respuesta. Me gustaría saber si estarías dispuesto a ayudarme con ese otro permiso OTRS en caso de tener suerte y que esta otra persona envie el formulario con el permiso.--Inefable001 (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Depende de como esté de tiempo podré hacerlo al momento o no, pero vamos, no dudes en avisarme cuando haya enviado el email y lo busco. --Alan ^(talk) 18:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Está bien. Muchas gracias por todo, es bueno saber que se cuenta con un colaborador como tú en Commons, pues como dije antes, ya había perdido la fe jeje. Gracias--Inefable001 (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tampoco es para perder la fe. Los compañeros han actuado bien por protocolo, una cuenta de email de gmail se crea en 3 minutos y no garantiza la autoría. Imagina que yo ahora me creo wikimedia.foundation@gmail.com, evidentemente no sería un email válido. Cuando se manda el permiso de una web (llamémosla por ejemplo lawedeejemplo.com) la autorización debe ser enviada por un email lo-que-sea@lawedeejemplo.com. En este caso ha habido suerte y he encontrado forma de relacionar la web con ese email, pero si te soy sincero, es algo que no hacemos nunca. Recibimos miles de emails y no podemos dedicar horas a un solo "ticket" o esto no saldría adelante. Recuerda avisar del tema del email en futuras solicitudes de permiso para ahorrar estos problemas, y si no lo tienen, que en algún sitio de esa web pongan que el email xxxxx@gmail.com es bueno. Un saludo. --Alan ^(talk) 18:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Claro, tienes razón y te entiendo perfectamente. Para la próxima vez lo hacemos como dices, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Alan, esta foto no pertenece a la página, aunque se encuentra en ella, el propietario de la web me dijo que no era de él, así que la puedes mandar a borrar. Saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, solicitado el borrado. Al menos él ha sido honesto y lo ha avisado, algo muy apreciable y que desde luego escasea en Commons. --Alan ^(talk) 09:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gracias. Si veo otra cosa mal te lo hago saber, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Revertí esto. Mientras vaya encontrando más errores te aviso, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, la verdad es que cuando se hacen las cosas de firma masiva siempre van quedando errores. Hace un rato he quitado también yo a 3 imágenes que eran de flickr. No creo que queden muchos errores ya. A la noche daré un repaso general a todo, revisando incluídas las categorías, para poder dar por zanjado este asunto. Alan ^(talk) 15:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! You recently reviewed following files which have wrong sources mentioned. How did you pass these files then?

There are probably more out there. Would you please go through all our reviews and actually review them properly?? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi.   Done

2nd, 3rd and 4 appears in that source using the "image slider", but I changed to your provided direct link.

The 1st photo... concerns me in that it has been able to pass, and the fault is mine. if I can't find, always use Google Images (I remember it well). But in this case I forgot to change the source. It seems to me serious. if you want, as another license reviewer, I resign to the permission. Only must tell me.

Thanks and sorry for waste your time. --Alan ^(talk) 09:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please verify what you have done there, the original is cc-by-sa-3.0 but this cropped version only has attribution. One of them must be wrong. --Denniss (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Denniss. Yes, correct license is the by-sa, fixed. At this moment i'm talking with uploader (see here User_talk:Alan#Tratemos_el_asunto_por_aquí) about this case. This is a complicated issue, with a "mass undeletion", review all images 1 to 1, tag with speedy no valid photos, ... and there are +100 images. I try to go as fast as possible and the uploader (user:Inefable001 is helping me quite. Thanks for warn. Greetings, Alan ^(talk) 13:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you confirmed OTRS permission for this image today, but forgot to add a license. Can you pls. have a look. Thx. --JuTa 11:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 11:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola Alan.

Me preguntaba si es posible utilizar un permiso OTRS para otro tipo de imágenes como por ejemplo carátulas de cd's, postadas de películas, logos, screenshot de televisión, etc...--Inefable001 (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Si. El permiso que se envía a OTRS es equivalente a que el autor ponga esa licencia en su web. Siempre que quien envíe el permiso sea el propietario de la totalidad de los derechos es perfectamente válido. Saludos, --Alan ^(talk) 12:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok, lo tendré en cuenta. Muchas gracias--Inefable001 (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hoy subí esta para que le pongas el ticket cuando tengas tiempo. No quería molestarte, pero como esto del OTRS siempre se toma mucho tiempo, tenía miedo de que la fueran a borrar. Saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 03:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done, saludos. Alan ^(talk) 08:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola Alan, aquí otra foto pendiente del ticket. Una vez la subí y ya le habían puesto el cartel rojo jeje. Un saludo y suerte con tu nominación a administrador.--Inefable001 (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola!! Estoy fuera de casa a 300km, en Valladolid, para el Wikipedia:Encuentros/VI Encuentro de wikipedistas en Valladolid y vuelvo el domingo. Estoy escribiendo desde el móvil. Espero no te importe que te responda el lunes. Un saludo y gracias por desearme suerte en la candidatura. Un gran saludo, Alan ^(talk) 21:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

No hay problema. Acabo de subir otra foto, espero no te moleste tener que hacer esto cada vez que subo una foto. Saludos y que estes bien.--Inefable001 (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Permiso añadido a las 2. Te he corregido la fuente de ambas, procura por favor que enlace a la página donde aparece la imagen. Ejemplo esto. No te preocupes, no me molesta para nada ayudarte. Así seguro que no se queda el permiso colgando de la nada. Un saludo. --Alan ^(talk) 18:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola Alan, felicitaciones por tu nuevo cargo. Sí, ya he tomado eso en cuenta en la foto más reciente que subí.

En otro tema, me gustaría que me dijeras si este logo pudiera ser transferible a Commmons, pues básicamente consta de simple texto. Saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gracias, aunque ahora lo único que tengo son mas "marrones".

La historia de siempre... para mí sí es aplicable la licencia {{PD-textlogo}}, aunque esto es bastante subjetivo. Yo lo que veo es un texto y varias rayas. Mi opinión personal es que lo subas, yo no le veo mayor problema. --Alan ^(talk) 18:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ah, pero se te olvidó ponerle el ticket a la foto jejeje.

Entonces intentaré trasladar el logo a ver, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 19:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cierto!! Ya lo tienes hecho. Saludos. Alan ^(talk) 20:42, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why do you think this gallery is out of scope? I see a lot of galleries while doing New Page Patrol and it seems to me that this easily fits within the guidelines at COM:Galleries -- it is a collection of images on a single subject with two sentences of description. The woman has an entry, albeit short, at IMDB and a long article on WP:ES, so she apparently meets our requirements for notability. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in my opinión is a little article with three images using <gallery>, not really a gallery. I think the place are Wikipedias. But this is very subjetive. If you see, I don't have any objection to keep. Alan ^(talk) 16:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's certainly a gray area -- I'm pretty tough on new galleries -- I delete twenty or thirty every day -- and I might have deleted this one a couple of years ago -- but a couple of trips to UnDR on galleries that I had deleted made it clear that the community thinks that a couple of sentences are OK. I now tend to agree. After all, we allow considerable description on each image, so why not a short description of the subject of a gallery? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Small article with 3 images? Small gallery with a text? This is a mess... xD --Alan ^(talk) 23:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

En lo personal, un portal que pone (c) al pie de página y con OTRS es una contradicción ya que no hay certeza que el autor sea quien afirma. Simplemente una verdadera y lamentable sorpresa que me llevé con este mensaje. Saludos Superzerocool (talk) 18:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

El dueño del portal ¿es el autor de las fotografías?, ¿tiene los derechos morales y comerciales para distribuir las fotografías?. Es muy fácil levantar una web, copiar imágenes de tercero y poner mi correo como whois de un sitio. Superzerocool (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Marisa Pavan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jezhotwells (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alan, I have seen you around on the project, and your work has not gone unnoticed. I think you and the project would benefit from you having the tools. In aid of this, I decided to nominate you for adminship at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Alan. I hope that you will accept. Cheers, russavia (talk) 16:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, it's an honor :) --Alan ^(talk) 16:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for quick response! --RomanM82 (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Reyes católicos Wax Museum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you've just refused to delete 0059-master-st preview ecran.jpg because of the deletion request. And yet the file received its OTRS permission yesterday and "everything is in order" according to Jean-Fred. How to close the request for deletion ? Best regards, A455bcd9 (talk) 11:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think. I have this case in my "TO-DO" list awaiting DR closure. Don't worry. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 11:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks ;) A455bcd9 (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done Alan ^(talk) 11:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

---

 

Alan, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--99of9 (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! Please accept my best wishes. @};- with respect: --Mehdi^Talk 19:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vaya, me he enterado en el momento en que terminó :( De todas formas mi enhorabuena pero sobre todo mis deseos de que te recuperes lo antes posible de tu dolencia. Agur, Poco a poco (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

¡Felicidades! - Jcb (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations and good luck! Trijnstel_talk 22:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to all

Jcb, felicidades a ti también.

poco2, gracias ya estoy mejorando.

Saludos/Greetings, Alan ^(talk) 11:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Felicidades/Zorionak. Lo siento, estuve ocupado estos días; así que ruego aceptes mis condolencias felicitaciones con retraso. Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gracias por el pésame la felicitación por mi aumento de "marrones" nuevo acceso a herramientas. Alan ^(talk) 08:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Alan, as the photographer of File:Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg may I state that the photo shows Route 404 and not Highway 50 as it was taken before the name change. The discussion on enwiki relates to the road in general, the photo to a specific point in time. This is why I deem this name change (these name changes) erroneous. I am aware that renaming was initiated by User:Atefrat. Best regards. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Rename reverted to File:Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg. I recommend starting a discussion in the file talk. --Alan ^(talk) 11:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Away for a couple of days. User:Atefrat has replied since, pointing out that renaming Route 404 into Highway 50 was officially already done in 2011 but street signs were still unchanged early 2012. Will think first and then put up suggestion for discussion what could be a proper name for "my" photo files ;) Regards -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Renamed to "50". Read User_talk:Alan#.22File:IL_Highway_50_06_2012-03-17.jpg.22_to_File:Route_404_06_2012-03-17.jpg. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 15:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is possible to get an exact explanation for deleting the file "Werwoelfe Rollen 1"? This would be very polite. Greetings... CellarDoord85 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

This image is a derivative work, copyright violation. See COM:L. Greetings. Alan ^(talk) 17:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation in which point? These graphics are made by myself! --CellarDoord85 (talk) 19:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Small icons are your own work? --Alan ^(talk) 19:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hola Alan. Un usuario ha estado vandalizando tu página de discusión y hasta creó una solicitud de borrado para la misma.--Inefable001 (talk) 03:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh! Muchas gracias por revertirlo. Ni dormir dejan a uno... Alan ^(talk) 07:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Alan! I don't understand what happened. 00:57, 27 May 2013‎ you renamed "Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg" to "IL Highway 50 06 2012-03-17.jpg based on the fact that "50" was the correct designation of the highway. Then, 11:12, 27 May 2013‎, you reversed the change and renamed the file back to "Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg"! Was that in respnse to User:KlausFoehl's assertion that the highway was named "404" at the time of the photo? That assertion was mistaken. See User talk:Atefrat#misleading renaming. KlausFoel agreed to the change of 404 to 50. File:Route 404 06 2012-03-17.jpg needs to be put back to "IL Highway 50 06 2012-03-17.jpg". Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 09:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Was renamed following your request see here (diff).

  Done per User_talk:Atefrat#misleading_renaming. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 15:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wow, it seems like were online at the same time. I see that you put back the "50" name. In a discussion with KlaseFoel, I find that he wants to change the name again, though keeping the "50". Something about a country name. They are his photos, so I will defer to whatever final decision he makes. Kind regards,--@Efrat (talk) 15:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Two names are valid at this moment, solved. The author's choice prevails in disputes. Cheers. --Alan ^(talk) 15:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

	The fluorine barnstar
	Thank you for the file review. TCO (talk) 22:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

P.s. Can you please move the file name to "laboratory apparatus for fluorine handling"? Better file name for searching. Thanks.TCO (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please, use {{Rename}} template. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 22:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Does a redirect get created? (I have a redmark in my article. No biggie and I can change the link, but just wondered how it works.)TCO (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

At this moment File:Freiburg F piping.jpg is a redirect to File:Laboratory apparatus for reactions with fluorine gas.jpg. --Alan ^(talk) 23:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

You deleted File:A view of the West Austin Antenna Farm from I-35.jpg from Commons. It was flagged by a bot as eligible to transfer to Commons from Wikipedia. Please let me know what the problem was so I can avoid the same mistake in the future. Thank you Nv8200p (talk) 00:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Author's request received by email in OTRS system. Greetings. --Alan ^(talk) 00:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply