Are Structural Estimates of Auction Models Reasonable? Evidence from Experimental Data
Patrick Bajari and
Ali Hortacsu
No 9889, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Recently, economists have developed methods for structural estimation of auction models. Many researchers object to these methods because they find the rationality assumptions used in these models to be implausible. In this paper, we explore whether structural auction models can generate reasonable estimates of bidders' private information. Using bid data from auction experiments, we estimate four alternative structural models of bidding in first-price sealed-bid auctions: 1) risk neutral Bayes-Nash, 2) risk averse Bayes-Nash, 3) a model of learning and 4) a quantal response model of bidding. For each model, we compare the estimated valuations and the valuations assigned to bidders in the experiments. We find that a slight modification of Guerre, Perrigne and Vuong's (2000) procedure for estimating the risk neutral Bayes-Nash model to allow for bidder asymmetries generates quite reasonable estimates of the structural parameters.
JEL-codes: C5 L0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-08
Note: IO
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)
Published as Bajari, Patrick and Ali Hortacsu. "Are Structural Estimates of Auction Models Reasonable? Evidence from Experimental Data." Journal of Political Economy 113, 4 (2005): 703-741.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w9889.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Are Structural Estimates of Auction Models Reasonable? Evidence from Experimental Data (2005)
Working Paper: Are Structural Estimates of Auction Models Reasonable? Evidence from Experimental Data (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:9889
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w9889
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().