Tax-Sheltered Retirement Accounts: Can Financial Education Improve Decisions?

M. Martin Boyer (), Philippe d’Astous and Pierre-Carl Michaud

Abstract: We conduct a stated-choice experiment to analyze the decision to contribute to front or back-loaded tax-sheltered savings accounts. Our experimental design includes a randomized financial education treatment that provides information on the two types of accounts. We assess whether respondents learn about the tax implications of these accounts, and whether they make better contribution choices when exposed to the financial education intervention. We find that, relative to a control group, our intervention improves both the understanding of the tax implications of the savings accounts (an increase of 6 to 15 points on a score of 100) and the quality of contribution decisions, improving the well-being of respondents by about 140$ in each scenario presented to them.

Keywords: Tax sheltered saving; retirement saving; financial education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D14 G11 H31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-05-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-age, nep-exp and nep-pub
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2019s-10.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Tax-Sheltered Retirement Accounts: Can Financial Education Improve Decisions? (2019)
Working Paper: Tax-Sheltered Retirement Accounts: Can Financial Education Improve Decisions? (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cir:cirwor:2019s-10

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CIRANO Working Papers from CIRANO Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Webmaster ().