Tax Systems in Transition Economics

Jorge Martinez-Vazquez and Robert McNab ()

International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University

Abstract: This paper presents an overview of taxation in the transitional economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. The governments of transitional economies have been implementingsimultaneous reforms of legal, political, and economic institutions, reforms which are dependent upon the ability of the emerging tax systems to efficiently enforce the tax system. As the transitional process continues, we are able to identify characteristics of successful reform programs, and note the common problems that hinder implementation of more stable tax systems. The discussion covers 4 main issues: the enduring legacy of centralized tax systems, the general direction and timing of tax reform, the tax policies of the transitional period, and thoughts about the path of reform in the future.In the Centrally Planned Economy (CPE), taxes were viewed as an instrument to manage cash flows and to fulfill the budget plan. Taxes were often retroactively adjusted to meet perceived expenditure needs. In many cases, the final tax liability of an enterprise was more dependent upon its ability to negotiate with the financial administration than tax law. Private activity was taxed at exorbitant rates and in most cases, citizens were unaware of taxation. Tax administration was simplified by the central role of the government in the economy and the control over the payment system.The path and timing of reform had to address the legacy of the previous system and determine the structure of the transitional tax system. Two major options were considered,a transitional system of taxesthat would be relatively simple to administer and provide broad coverage of the economy, and a system that would replicate most features of Western tax systems. The most common adoption of the latter system led to substantialproblems, although over time there has been convergence towards sensible tax structures. Yet, the gains of the last 4 to 6 years are endangered by the almost universal lack ofprogress in the reform and modernization of tax administrations. While governments have been able to adopt andevolve their Western oriented tax systems with relative ease, the lack of a significant commitment to modernize existing tax administrations has led to higher tax evasion and low rates of revenue mobilization.Only recently, as governments face substantial fiscal deficits resulting for low rates of revenue mobilization, is more attention being paid to tax administration.

Keywords: tax; transition; tax reform (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 101 pages
Date: 1997-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://icepp.gsu.edu/files/2015/03/ispwp9701.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper9701

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Benson ().