Do survey expectations of stock returns reflect risk-adjustments?
Klaus Adam,
Dmitry Matveev and
Stefan Nagel
No 600, CFS Working Paper Series from Center for Financial Studies (CFS)
Abstract:
Motivated by the observation that survey expectations of stock returns are inconsistent with rational return expectations under real-world probabilities, we investigate whether alternative expectations hypotheses entertained in the asset pricing literature are consistent with the survey evidence. We empirically test (1) the notion that survey forecasts constitute rational but risk-neutral forecasts of future returns, and (2) the notion that survey forecasts are ambiguity averse/robust forecasts of future returns. We find that these alternative hypotheses are also strongly rejected by the data, albeit for different reasons. Hypothesis (1) is rejected because survey return forecasts are not in line with risk-free interest rates and because survey expected excess returns are predictable. Hypothesis (2) is rejected because agents are not always pessimistic about future returns, instead often display overly optimistic return expectations. We speculate as to what kind of expectations theories might be consistent with the available survey evidence.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/183610/1/1037620399.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Do survey expectations of stock returns reflect risk adjustments? (2021)
Working Paper: Do Survey Expectations of Stock Returns Reflect Risk Adjustments? (2019)
Working Paper: Do Survey Expectations of Stock Returns Reflect Risk-Adjustments? (2019)
Working Paper: Do Survey Expectations of Stock Returns Reflect Risk-Adjustments? (2018)
Working Paper: Do Survey Expectations of Stock Returns Reflect Risk-Adjustments? (2018)
Working Paper: Do Survey Expectations of Stock Returns Reflect Risk-Adjustments? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:cfswop:600
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CFS Working Paper Series from Center for Financial Studies (CFS) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().