RePEc Data Check for series repec:col:000506

Each night we check the validity of new and modified templates in the RePEc archives mirrored at EconPapers and run a link checker on a portion of the data. Data for series last updated 2023-08-04 01:04:00 GMT.

• Data checked 2024-10-27 06:37:22 GMT, 0 errors and 73 warnings. 65 templates without errors.
• Currently mirrored files for series (login with username datacheck and password repec)
• Results for the col archive.
• Access statistics for repec:col:000506.

EconPapers listing for Revista Clio América From Universidad del Magdalena
Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revista CLIO ().

---

rdf/redif-files, ReDIF compliance

Templates with errors can not be processed correctly and are dropped. Lines with warnings are ignored when the template is processed.
Consult the ReDIF documentation for further information.

Data checked 2024-10-27 06:37:22 GMT, 0 errors and 73 warnings. 65 templates without errors.
Correcting your data? Use our interactive check to validate your corrections.

Files with errors or warnings

Click to view problems in context (login with username datacheck and password repec)

• 000506014995.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506015000.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506015004.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506015005.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506015021.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506015022.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506015024.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506015214.rdf 0 errors, 5 warnings
• 000506015216.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506015217.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506015329.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506015330.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506016101.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506016102.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506016103.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506016521.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506016522.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506016523.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506016524.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506016525.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506016527.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506016528.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506017273.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506017549.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506017550.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506017551.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506019667.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506019668.rdf 0 errors, 6 warnings
• 000506019671.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506019672.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506019674.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000506019675.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000506019676.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506019678.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506019680.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000506019681.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings

Warnings

1. (000506014995.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
2. (000506014995.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
3. (000506014995.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
4. (000506015000.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
5. (000506015004.rdf, line 3): Long author-name 'Alexander Mauricio Caraballo Payares', possibly multiple authors
6. (000506015005.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
7. (000506015005.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
8. (000506015021.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
9. (000506015022.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
10. (000506015022.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
11. (000506015024.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
12. (000506015214.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
13. (000506015214.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{C1} interpreted as Windows-1252
14. (000506015214.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
15. (000506015214.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{FA} interpreted as Windows-1252
16. (000506015214.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
17. (000506015216.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
18. (000506015216.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
19. (000506015216.rdf, line 11): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
20. (000506015217.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
21. (000506015329.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{FA} interpreted as Windows-1252
22. (000506015329.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
23. (000506015329.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
24. (000506015330.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
25. (000506016101.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
26. (000506016101.rdf, line 6): Invalid value 'Ingrid.soto@upacifico' of type <email> (attribute 'author-email', regex)
27. (000506016102.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
28. (000506016103.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
29. (000506016103.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
30. (000506016521.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{FA} interpreted as Windows-1252
31. (000506016521.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
32. (000506016521.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
33. (000506016522.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
34. (000506016522.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
35. (000506016522.rdf, line 16): An invalid JEL code used '25'
36. (000506016523.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
37. (000506016524.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
38. (000506016524.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
39. (000506016524.rdf, line 18): An invalid JEL code used 'MOO'
40. (000506016525.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
41. (000506016527.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
42. (000506016527.rdf, line 16): An invalid JEL code used 'L37'
43. (000506016528.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
44. (000506016528.rdf, line 18): An invalid JEL code used 'IO'
45. (000506017273.rdf, line 18): An invalid JEL code used '032'
46. (000506017549.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
47. (000506017550.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
48. (000506017551.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
49. (000506017551.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
50. (000506017551.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
51. (000506019667.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
52. (000506019667.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
53. (000506019668.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
54. (000506019668.rdf, line 11): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
55. (000506019668.rdf, line 20): Invalid value '01; 013; 0130' of type <jel> (attribute 'classification-jel', eval)
56. (000506019668.rdf, line 20): An invalid JEL code used '01'
57. (000506019668.rdf, line 20): An invalid JEL code used '013'
58. (000506019668.rdf, line 20): An invalid JEL code used '0130'
59. (000506019671.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
60. (000506019671.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
61. (000506019671.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
62. (000506019672.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
63. (000506019672.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
64. (000506019672.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
65. (000506019674.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
66. (000506019674.rdf, line 11): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
67. (000506019675.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
68. (000506019675.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
69. (000506019675.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
70. (000506019676.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
71. (000506019678.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
72. (000506019680.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
73. (000506019681.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252

---

URL check

URLs not checked