RePEc Data Check for series repec:col:000425

Each night we check the validity of new and modified templates in the RePEc archives mirrored at EconPapers and run a link checker on a portion of the data. Data for series last updated 2023-08-04 01:04:00 GMT.

• Data checked 2024-10-27 06:37:12 GMT, 0 errors and 52 warnings. 222 templates without errors.
• Currently mirrored files for series (login with username datacheck and password repec)
• Results for the col archive.
• Access statistics for repec:col:000425.

EconPapers listing for Economía Journal From The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA
Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LACEA ().

---

rdf/redif-files, ReDIF compliance

Templates with errors can not be processed correctly and are dropped. Lines with warnings are ignored when the template is processed.
Consult the ReDIF documentation for further information.

Data checked 2024-10-27 06:37:12 GMT, 0 errors and 52 warnings. 222 templates without errors.
Correcting your data? Use our interactive check to validate your corrections.

Files with errors or warnings

Click to view problems in context (login with username datacheck and password repec)

• 000425008355.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008585.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008586.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425008589.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008611.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008612.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008613.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008646.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008649.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008650.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008661.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425008662.rdf 0 errors, 5 warnings
• 000425008667.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008672.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008673.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008674.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008684.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008686.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008705.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425008714.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425009147.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425009967.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425012280.rdf 0 errors, 3 warnings
• 000425012282.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425012570.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425014008.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425015160.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425016952.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425016953.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425016954.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425016957.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425017276.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425017279.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425017735.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425017739.rdf 0 errors, 2 warnings
• 000425017740.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings
• 000425019767.rdf 0 errors, 1 warnings

Warnings

1. (000425008355.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
2. (000425008585.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
3. (000425008586.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
4. (000425008586.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
5. (000425008589.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{D1} interpreted as Windows-1252
6. (000425008611.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{D1} interpreted as Windows-1252
7. (000425008612.rdf, line 15): An invalid JEL code used '015'
8. (000425008613.rdf, line 18): An invalid JEL code used '!25'
9. (000425008646.rdf, line 17): An invalid JEL code used '015'
10. (000425008649.rdf, line 8): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
11. (000425008650.rdf, line 14): An invalid JEL code used '015'
12. (000425008661.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
13. (000425008661.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
14. (000425008662.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
15. (000425008662.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
16. (000425008662.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
17. (000425008662.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
18. (000425008662.rdf, line 11): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
19. (000425008667.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
20. (000425008672.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
21. (000425008673.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
22. (000425008674.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
23. (000425008684.rdf, line 18): An invalid JEL code used '31'
24. (000425008686.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
25. (000425008705.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
26. (000425008714.rdf, line 14): An invalid JEL code used '054'
27. (000425009147.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
28. (000425009147.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
29. (000425009967.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
30. (000425012280.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
31. (000425012280.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
32. (000425012280.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
33. (000425012282.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
34. (000425012282.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
35. (000425012570.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
36. (000425012570.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
37. (000425014008.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
38. (000425015160.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
39. (000425015160.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{C1} interpreted as Windows-1252
40. (000425016952.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
41. (000425016953.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
42. (000425016953.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
43. (000425016954.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E3} interpreted as Windows-1252
44. (000425016954.rdf, line 11): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
45. (000425016957.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
46. (000425017276.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{F1} interpreted as Windows-1252
47. (000425017279.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{F3} interpreted as Windows-1252
48. (000425017735.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
49. (000425017739.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{ED} interpreted as Windows-1252
50. (000425017739.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E1} interpreted as Windows-1252
51. (000425017740.rdf, line 7): Bad utf-8 character \x{E9} interpreted as Windows-1252
52. (000425019767.rdf, line 9): Bad utf-8 character \x{E7} interpreted as Windows-1252

---

URL check

URLs not checked