Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review (Q34570727)

3 August 2017

2 references

7 April 2021

Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review (English)

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference

7 April 2021

1 reference

Uwe Sander

0 references

Martin Emmert

1 reference

3 August 2017

Frank Pisch

series ordinal

1 reference

3 August 2017

publication date

1 February 2013

2 references

Journal of Medical Internet Research

3 August 2017

7 April 2021

2 references

3 August 2017

7 April 2021

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference

3 August 2017

page(s)

e24

1 reference

Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

3 August 2017

1 reference

A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period

7 April 2021

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

German language physician rating sites

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Ethical principles for physician rating sites.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Public reporting in health care: the impact of publicly reported quality data on patient steerage

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Physician rating sites from an ethical viewpoint: a roadmap

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

The availability and nature of physician information on the internet

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

An analysis of healthcare providers' online ratings

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

The role of the Internet in doctor performance rating.

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3636311

Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery

7 July 2018

1 reference

Quality report cards, selection of cardiac surgeons, and racial disparities: a study of the publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reports

21 January 2018

1 reference

RateMDs.com nets ire of Canadian physicians

21 January 2018

1 reference

Feasibility of real-time satisfaction surveys through automated analysis of patients' unstructured comments and sentiments.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Doctor rating sites: which of them find the best doctors in Germany?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Efficacy and efficiency of searches for a physician using physician search and evaluation portals in comparison with Google

21 January 2018

1 reference

Patients’ opinions of health care providers for supporting choice and quality improvement

21 January 2018

1 reference

Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Will doctor rating sites improve standards of care? Yes

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Websites to assess quality of care--appropriate to identify good physicians?]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Online reviews of physicians: what are your patients posting about you?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Googling ourselves--what physicians can learn from online rating sites

1 reference

12 December 2020

Putting the Public Back in Public Reporting of Health Care Quality

1 reference

12 December 2020

Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports

1 reference

12 December 2020

Identifiers

DOI

10.2196/JMIR.2360

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference

3 August 2017

1 reference