Template talk:BrawlTiers

Should the scores really be given in the template? It's a bit of an awkward read, and it's shown underneath the template in the only article that template is used in anyway. --Laos (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

1. whatlinkshere disagrees.
2. The exact numbers are not displayed on the tier list page, which is why I posted them. If you'd prefer a separate table or something for their scores and consensus agrees, then sure. --Shadowcrest 20:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

...The colors of the different tiers are not clearly distinguishable enough. It is too difficult to immediately identify where on tier ends and another begins. I don't have time to take care of the coding tonight, but if no one else gets to it, I'll take a shifty at it in a day or so. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 05:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I've just doubled the brightness of the colours. Toomai Glittershine   The Stats Guy 12:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Can we please have names instead of pictures? The pictures can make some characters (like Wolf) hard 2 find. Because this template and the tier list article are protected I think it would B safe. Clarinet Hawk fan (talk) 20:37, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

We used to have that, but i twas decided to use colors and pictures, as it made characters more identifiable, along with the different tier sections.Smoreking^(T) _(c) 20:47, November 29, 2009 (UTC)

Clarinet Hawk fan (talk) 22:55, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

reasoning? Shadowcrest 23:10, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

What if a vandal created an account, waited a few days, then altered the tier so Ganon was number one? 98.117.158.220 23:49, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

It's very annoying for a vandal to try to create an account, wait four days, do it, get blocked and have their "contributions" undone, change IPs and repeat. It would be a waste of time, plus they'd forget or stop out of frustration. Hence, the reason why semi-protect exists in the first place. That argument doesn't work; again, why would we need full protection? RAN1 01:24, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

This isn't the kind of page that ordinary users should edit. Only admins can be trusted. 98.117.158.220 01:41, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

We'd just undo it and move along. It's not like "omg teir list was vandald end of wrld!!!!1" or anything. If a history of vandalism started developing or something, you might have an argument, but generally things aren't protected just because people might vandalize it. Toomai Glittershine   The Stats Guy 03:14, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Is there a better picture that we could possibly use for Marth in the brawl list? The colors don't stand out enough and it is hard to make Marth out against the background. I can look through the pictures tomorrow, but if someone knows something good now, just go for it. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 08:48, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

How come Zelda/Sheik is above both of Zelda and Sheik individually? Shouldn't "they" rather be somewhere inbetween? – Smiddle_T 08:56, 6 January 2011 (EST)

It's because they are considered better characters when used together. Omega Tyrant   09:14, 6 January 2011 (EST)

A or B? Miles (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

I'd have to say A. What appears to be insignificant spacing actually makes the tier list easier on the eyes. MegaTron1XD  18:15, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Well, A is more consistent with all the other tier templates. Toast  ltimatum  18:20, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

Neither, the tiers should be fitted to match the tier hierarchy listed in the thread. Omega Tyrant   19:08, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

I decided to make it four rows. It's more symmetrical and fits the BBR's arbitrary tier groupings, which while utterly pointless ends up being a bit of a bonus. Toomai Glittershine   The Interspacial 22:45, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

I had been avoiding stretching it into a fourth row, but I see the advantages. Good work. Miles (talk) 22:58, 28 April 2012 (EDT)

I've been trying to figure it out myself, but nothing I've tried so far seems to work. Unowninator (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2016 (EDT)

Hm yes 19 cells is much wider than we normally make these (I try to keep to 13 or 15 max). It looks like someone changed it because they didn't like all the empty spaces in the previous format, but if it's too long I'll change it back. Toomai Glittershine   The Awesome 09:28, 29 August 2016 (EDT)

Wow, it was that simple? XD Thanks so much. Unowninator (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2016 (EDT)