[go: up one dir, main page]

Search a number
-
+
5335124101 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001111011111111…
…11000100010000101
3111202210222101101221
410331333320202011
541411242432401
62241222120341
7246131543446
oct47577704205
914683871357
105335124101
1122985a177a
12104a8800b1
13670406a88
143887b92cd
152135a27a1
hex13dff8885

5335124101 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 5335124102. Its totient is φ = 5335124100.

The previous prime is 5335124099. The next prime is 5335124153. The reversal of 5335124101 is 1014215335.

It is a happy number.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 5241615201 + 93508900 = 72399^2 + 9670^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 5335124101 - 21 = 5335124099 is a prime.

Together with 5335124099, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (5335127101) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2667562050 + 2667562051.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2667562051).

Almost surely, 25335124101 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

5335124101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

5335124101 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

5335124101 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1800, while the sum is 25.

The square root of 5335124101 is about 73041.9338530956. The cubic root of 5335124101 is about 1747.3564550467.

Adding to 5335124101 its reverse (1014215335), we get a palindrome (6349339436).

The spelling of 5335124101 in words is "five billion, three hundred thirty-five million, one hundred twenty-four thousand, one hundred one".