Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100001000000… |
… | …1000011000000 |
3 | 10112200222010000 |
4 | 3002001003000 |
5 | 101010011344 |
6 | 5014040000 |
7 | 1155206352 |
oct | 302010300 |
9 | 115628100 |
10 | 50860224 |
11 | 26789048 |
12 | 15049000 |
13 | a6c9b0c |
14 | 6a7d0d2 |
15 | 46e9a69 |
hex | 30810c0 |
50860224 has 70 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 150781004. Its totient is φ = 16951680.
The previous prime is 50860223. The next prime is 50860253. The reversal of 50860224 is 42206805.
50860224 is a `hidden beast` number, since 50 + 8 + 602 + 2 + 4 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (50860223) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 9 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 279 + ... + 10089.
Almost surely, 250860224 is an apocalyptic number.
50860224 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (54) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 50860224, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (75390502).
50860224 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (99920780).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
50860224 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
50860224 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 9835 (or 9816 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3840, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 50860224 is about 7131.6354365601. The cubic root of 50860224 is about 370.5038764367.
The spelling of 50860224 in words is "fifty million, eight hundred sixty thousand, two hundred twenty-four".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.001 sec. • engine limits •