[go: up one dir, main page]

Search a number
-
+
3123321281 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1011101000101010…
…0001100111000001
322001200002011022222
42322022201213001
522344032240111
61233531340425
7140253535643
oct27212414701
98050064288
103123321281
111363040563
12731bb1715
133aa102102
14218b48893
151343037db
hexba2a19c1

3123321281 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3123321282. Its totient is φ = 3123321280.

The previous prime is 3123321263. The next prime is 3123321337. The reversal of 3123321281 is 1821233213.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2436409600 + 686911681 = 49360^2 + 26209^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-3123321281 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×31233212812 = 19510271648694961922, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 3123321281.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3123327281) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1561660640 + 1561660641.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1561660641).

Almost surely, 23123321281 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3123321281 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3123321281 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3123321281 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 1728, while the sum is 26.

The square root of 3123321281 is about 55886.6825012901. The cubic root of 3123321281 is about 1461.7470299946.

Adding to 3123321281 its reverse (1821233213), we get a palindrome (4944554494).

The spelling of 3123321281 in words is "three billion, one hundred twenty-three million, three hundred twenty-one thousand, two hundred eighty-one".