Abstract
Research linking social media use and adolescent mental health has produced mixed and inconsistent findings and little translational evidence, despite pressure to deliver concrete recommendations for families, schools and policymakers. At the same time, it is widely recognized that developmental changes in behaviour, cognition and neurobiology predispose adolescents to developing socio-emotional disorders. In this Review, we argue that such developmental changes would be a fruitful focus for social media research. Specifically, we review mechanisms by which social media could amplify the developmental changes that increase adolescents’ mental health vulnerability. These mechanisms include changes to behaviour, such as sharing risky content and self-presentation, and changes to cognition, such as modifications in self-concept, social comparison, responsiveness to social feedback and experiences of social exclusion. We also consider neurobiological mechanisms that heighten stress sensitivity and modify reward processing. By focusing on mechanisms by which social media might interact with developmental changes to increase mental health risks, our Review equips researchers with a toolkit of key digital affordances that enables theorizing and studying technology effects despite an ever-changing social media landscape.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
66,17 € per year
only 5,51 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Savin-Williams, R. Adolescence: An Ethological Perspective (Springer, 1987).
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D. & Patton, G. C. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child. Adolesc. Health 2, 223–228 (2018).
Paus, T., Keshavan, M. & Giedd, J. N. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 947–957 (2008).
Solmi, M. et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 281–295 (2022).
Orben, A., Lucas, R. E., Fuhrmann, D. & Kievit, R. A. Trajectories of adolescent life satisfaction. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 9, 211808 (2022).
Rapee, R. M. et al. Adolescent development and risk for the onset of social-emotional disorders: a review and conceptual model. Behav. Res. Ther. 123, 103501 (2019). This review describes why adolescence is a sensitive period for mental health vulnerability.
Arango, C. et al. Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence‐based atlas. World Psychiatry 20, 417–436 (2021).
Ioannidis, K., Askelund, A. D., Kievit, R. A. & van Harmelen, A.-L. The complex neurobiology of resilient functioning after childhood maltreatment. BMC Med. 18, 32 (2020).
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D. & Kupfer, D. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. AJP 158, 848–856 (2001).
Hankin, B. L. & Abramson, L. Y. Development of gender differences in depression: an elaborated cognitive vulnerability–transactional stress theory. Psychol. Bull. 127, 773–796 (2001).
Collishaw, S., Maughan, B., Natarajan, L. & Pickles, A. Trends in adolescent emotional problems in England: a comparison of two national cohorts twenty years apart: twenty-year trends in emotional problems. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 51, 885–894 (2010).
Pitchforth, J. M., Viner, R. M. & Hargreaves, D. S. Trends in mental health and wellbeing among children and young people in the UK: a repeated cross-sectional study, 2000–14. Lancet 388, S93 (2016).
Coley, R. L., O’Brien, M. & Spielvogel, B. Secular trends in adolescent depressive symptoms: growing disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged schools. J. Youth Adolescence 48, 2087–2098 (2019).
Patalay, P. & Gage, S. H. Changes in millennial adolescent mental health and health-related behaviours over 10 years: a population cohort comparison study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 1650–1664 (2019).
Pitchforth, J. M. et al. Mental health and well-being trends among children and young people in the UK, 1995–2014: analysis of repeated cross-sectional national health surveys. Psychol. Med. 49, 1275–1285 (2019).
Plana‐Ripoll, O. et al. Temporal changes in sex‐ and age‐specific incidence profiles of mental disorders—a nationwide study from 1970 to 2016. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 145, 604–614 (2022).
Twenge, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Joiner, T. E., Duffy, M. E. & Binau, S. G. Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005–2017. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 128, 185–199 (2019).
van Vuuren, C. L., Uitenbroek, D. G., van der Wal, M. F. & Chinapaw, M. J. M. Sociodemographic differences in 10-year time trends of emotional and behavioural problems among adolescents attending secondary schools in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Eur. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 27, 1621–1631 (2018).
Collishaw, S. Annual research review: secular trends in child and adolescent mental health. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 56, 370–393 (2015).
Goodwin, R. D. et al. Trends in U.S. depression prevalence from 2015 to 2020: the widening treatment gap. Am. J. Prev. Med. 63, 726–733 (2022).
Mojtabai, R. & Olfson, M. National trends in mental health care for US adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 703 (2020).
Mojtabai, R., Olfson, M. & Han, B. National trends in the prevalence and treatment of depression in adolescents and young adults. Pediatrics 138, e20161878 (2016).
Goodwin, R. D., Weinberger, A. H., Kim, J. H., Wu, M. & Galea, S. Trends in anxiety among adults in the United States, 2008–2018: rapid increases among young adults. J. Psychiatr. Res. 130, 441–446 (2020).
Beerten, S. G. et al. Trends in the registration of anxiety in Belgian primary care from 2000 to 2021: a registry-based study. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 73, e460–e467 (2022).
Walrave, R. et al. Trends in the epidemiology of depression and comorbidities from 2000 to 2019 in Belgium. BMC Prim. Care 23, 163 (2022).
Vuorre, M. & Przybylski, A. K. Global well-being and mental health in the internet age. Clin. Psychol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026231207791 (2023).
Steffen, A., Thom, J., Jacobi, F., Holstiege, J. & Bätzing, J. Trends in prevalence of depression in Germany between 2009 and 2017 based on nationwide ambulatory claims data. J. Affect. Disord. 271, 239–247 (2020).
Ford, T. Editorial Perspective: why I am now convinced that emotional disorders are increasingly common among young people in many countries. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatr. 61, 1275–1277 (2020).
McElroy, E., Tibber, M., Fearon, P., Patalay, P. & Ploubidis, G. B. Socioeconomic and sex inequalities in parent‐reported adolescent mental ill‐health: time trends in four British birth cohorts. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 64, 758–767 (2022).
OECD. Society at a Glance 2019: OECD Social Indicators (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2019).
Ofcom. Online Nation (2021). Ofcom.org.uk https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/online-research/online-nation (2022).
Anderson, M. & Jiang, J. Teens’ Social Media Habits and Experiences (Pew Research Center, 2018).
McFarland, L. A. & Ployhart, R. E. Social media: a contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 100, 1653–1677 (2015).
Büchi, M. Digital well-being theory and research. N. Media Soc. 26, 172–189 (2024).
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S. & Prinstein, M. J. Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: part 1—a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 21, 267–294 (2018). This landmark paper applies the idea of affordances to understanding the impact of social media on adolescent social relationships.
Taffel, S. Perspectives on the postdigital: beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence 22, 324–338 (2016).
Papacharissi, Z. We have always been social. Soc. Media + Society 1, 205630511558118 (2015).
Crone, E. A. & Konijn, E. A. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018). This article describes adolescent cognitive and neural development and its intersection with new types of technology.
Weinstein, E. & James, C. Behind Their Screens: What Teens Are Facing (and Adults Are Missing) (MIT Press, 2022).
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L. & Martin, G. N. Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among U.S. adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6, 3–17 (2017).
Gunnell, D., Kidger, J. & Elvidge, H. Adolescent mental health in crisis. BMJ 361, k2608 (2018).
Odgers, C. L., Schueller, S. M. & Ito, M. Screen time, social media use, and adolescent development. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 2, 485–502 (2020).
Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A. & Beyens, I. Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: an umbrella review of the evidence. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 44, 58–68 (2022).
Kreski, N. et al. Social media use and depressive symptoms among United States adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 68, 572–579 (2020).
Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., Keijsers, L. & Valkenburg, P. M. The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. Sci. Rep. 10, 10763 (2020). This landmark paper highlights that the impacts of social media on well-being are highly individual.
Jensen, M., George, M. J., Russell, M. R. & Odgers, C. L. Young adolescents’ digital technology use and mental health symptoms: little evidence of longitudinal or daily linkages. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7, 1416–1433 (2019).
Orben, A., Dienlin, T. & Przybylski, A. K. Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10226–10228 (2019).
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S. & Gentzkow, M. The welfare effects of social media. Am. Economic Rev. 110, 629–676 (2020).
Nassen, L.-M., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K. & Karsay, K. Opt-out, abstain, unplug. A systematic review of the voluntary digital disconnection literature. Telemat. Inform. 81, 101980 (2023).
Dienlin, T. & Johannes, N. The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 22, 135–142 (2020).
Odgers, C. L. & Jensen, M. R. Annual research review: adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 336–348 (2020).
Meier, A. & Reinecke, L. Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: a conceptual and empirical meta-review. Commun. Res. 48, 1182–1209 (2021). This review provides a hierarchical taxonomy of the levels of analysis at which social media can be conceptualized and measured.
Orben, A. Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 55, 407–414 (2020).
Bell, V., Bishop, D. V. M. & Przybylski, A. K. The debate over digital technology and young people. BMJ 351, h3064 (2015).
Online Safety Act 2023. legislation.gov.uk, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/enacted (2023).
Hawkes, N. CMO report is unable to shed light on impact of screen time and social media on children’s health. BMJ 364, l643 (2019).
US Department of Health and Human Services. Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory (2023).
Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. The differential susceptibility to media effects model: differential susceptibility to media effects model. J. Commun. 63, 221–243 (2013). This landmark paper examines how the impact of media is influenced by individual differences.
Orben, A., Przybylski, A. K., Blakemore, S.-J. & Kievit, R. A. Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media. Nat. Commun. 13, 1649 (2022). This large-scale data analysis shows that adolescent development potentially influences how social media impacts well-being.
Orben, A. & Blakemore, S.-J. How social media affects teen mental health: a missing link. Nature 614, 410–412 (2023).
Shaw, H. et al. Quantifying smartphone “use”: choice of measurement impacts relationships between “usage” and health. Technol. Mind Behav. 1, https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000022 (2020).
Parry, D. A. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 1535–1547 (2021).
Verduyn, P., Gugushvili, N. & Kross, E. Do social networking sites influence well-being? The extended active-passive model. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 62–68 (2022).
Davidson, B. I., Shaw, H. & Ellis, D. A. Fuzzy constructs in technology usage scales. Comput. Hum. Behav. 133, 107206 (2022).
Shaw, D. J., Kaye, L. K., Ngombe, N., Kessler, K. & Pennington, C. R. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: an experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites. PLoS ONE 17, e0276765 (2022).
Griffioen, N., Van Rooij, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. & Granic, I. Toward improved methods in social media research. Technol. Mind Behav. 1, https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000005 (2020).
Valkenburg, P. M. Social media use and well-being: what we know and what we need to know. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 45, 101294 (2022).
Yang, C., Holden, S. M. & Ariati, J. Social media and psychological well-being among youth: the multidimensional model of social media use. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 24, 631–650 (2021).
Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C. & Sacker, A. Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine 6, 59–68 (2019).
Orben, A. & Przybylski, A. K. The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 173–182 (2019).
Sultan, M., Scholz, C. & van den Bos, W. Leaving traces behind: using social media digital trace data to study adolescent wellbeing. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 10, 100281 (2023).
Kaye, L., Orben, A., Ellis, D., Hunter, S. & Houghton, S. The conceptual and methodological mayhem of “screen time”. IJERPH 17, 3661 (2020).
Choukas-Bradley, S., Roberts, S. R., Maheux, A. J. & Nesi, J. The perfect storm: a developmental–sociocultural framework for the role of social media in adolescent girls’ body image concerns and mental health. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 25, 681–701 (2022). This review focuses on how social media can influence adolescent development of body image.
Moreno, M. A. & Uhls, Y. T. Applying an affordances approach and a developmental lens to approach adolescent social media use. Digital Health 5, 205520761982667 (2019).
Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C. & Wohn, D. Y. Facebook as a toolkit: a uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 2322–2329 (2011).
Bayer, J. B., Triêu, P. & Ellison, N. B. Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 71, 471–497 (2020).
Gibson, J. J. The Scological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, 1979).
Norman, D. A. The Psychology of Everyday Things (Basic Books, 1988).
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J. & Treem, J. W. Explicating affordances: a conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 22, 35–52 (2017).
Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y. & Falk, E. B. Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information. Commun. Soc. 19, 956–977 (2016).
Fox, J. & McEwan, B. Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: the perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Commun. Monogr. 84, 298–318 (2017).
Kreling, R., Meier, A. & Reinecke, L. Feeling authentic on social media: subjective authenticity across instagram stories and posts. Soc. Media + Society 8, 205630512210862 (2022).
Leonardi, P. M. Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: toward a theory of communication visibility. Inf. Syst. Res. 25, 796–816 (2014).
Treem, J. W. & Leonardi, P. M. Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36, 143–189 (2013).
Ellison, N. B., Pyle, C. & Vitak, J. Scholarship on well-being and social media: a sociotechnical perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 46, 101340 (2022).
Orben, A. The Sisyphean cycle of technology panics. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 1143–1157 (2020).
Granic, I., Morita, H. & Scholten, H. Beyond screen time: identity development in the digital age. Psychol. Inq. 31, 195–223 (2020). This perspective discusses how adolescent identity development might be impacted by digital platforms including social media and video games.
Lieberman, A. & Schroeder, J. Two social lives: how differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 31, 16–21 (2020).
Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J. Adolesc. Health 48, 121–127 (2011).
Steinberg, L. et al. Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Dev. Sci. 21, e12532 (2018).
Blakemore, S.-J. & Robbins, T. W. Decision-making in the adolescent brain. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1184–1191 (2012).
Steinberg, L. A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Dev. Rev. 28, 78–106 (2008).
Chein, J., Albert, D., O’Brien, L., Uckert, K. & Steinberg, L. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry: peer influence on risk taking. Dev. Sci. 14, F1–F10 (2011).
Blakemore, S.-J. Avoiding social risk in adolescence. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27, 116–122 (2018).
Blakemore, S.-J. & Mills, K. L. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65, 187–207 (2014). This review presents adolescence as an important stage of development characterized by changes to social cognition.
Campbell, R. et al. Multiple risk behaviour in adolescence is associated with substantial adverse health and social outcomes in early adulthood: findings from a prospective birth cohort study. Prev. Med. 138, 106157 (2020).
Kurten, S. et al. Like to drink: dynamics of liking alcohol posts and effects on alcohol use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 129, 107145 (2022).
Vannucci, A., Simpson, E. G., Gagnon, S. & Ohannessian, C. M. Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: a meta‐analysis. J. Adolesc. 79, 258–274 (2020).
Eichhorn, K. The End of Forgetting: Growing up with Social Media (Harvard Univ. Press, 2019).
Litt, E. & Hargittai, E. The imagined audience on social network sites. Soc. Media + Society 2, 205630511663348 (2016).
Vitak, J. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 56, 451–470 (2012).
Livingstone, S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. N. Media Soc. 10, 393–411 (2008).
Marciano, L., Schulz, P. J. & Camerini, A.-L. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in youth: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 25, 163–181 (2020).
Mori, C., Temple, J. R., Browne, D. & Madigan, S. Association of sexting with sexual behaviors and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 173, 770 (2019).
Suler, J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 7, 321–326 (2004).
Wright, M. F., Harper, B. D. & Wachs, S. The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: the moderating effect of online disinhibition. Pers. Individ. Differ. 140, 41–45 (2019).
Nitschinsk, L., Tobin, S. J. & Vanman, E. J. The disinhibiting effects of anonymity increase online trolling. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 25, 377–383 (2022).
Nadkarni, A. & Hofmann, S. G. Why do people use Facebook? Pers. Individ. Differ. 52, 243–249 (2012).
Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. Impression management: a literature review and two-component model. Psychol. Bull. 107, 34–47 (1990).
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S. & Martin, J. Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 1816–1836 (2008).
Bij de Vaate, N. A. J. D., Veldhuis, J. & Konijn, E. A. How online self-presentation affects well-being and body image: a systematic review. Telemat. Inform. 47, 101316 (2020).
Reinecke, L. & Trepte, S. Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 95–102 (2014).
Twomey, C. & O’Reilly, G. Associations of self-presentation on Facebook with mental health and personality variables: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 20, 587–595 (2017).
Vanden Abeele, M., Schouten, A. P. & Antheunis, M. L. Personal, editable, and always accessible: an affordance approach to the relationship between adolescents’ mobile messaging behavior and their friendship quality. J. Soc. Personal. Relatsh. 34, 875–893 (2017).
Krause, H.-V., Baum, K., Baumann, A. & Krasnova, H. Unifying the detrimental and beneficial effects of social network site use on self-esteem: a systematic literature review. Media Psychol. 24, 10–47 (2021).
Carr, C. T. & Foreman, A. C. Identity shift III: effects of publicness of feedback and relational closeness in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychol. 19, 334–358 (2016).
Walther, J. B. et al. The effect of feedback on identity shift in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychol. 14, 1–26 (2011).
Gonzales, A. L. & Hancock, J. T. Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychol. 11, 167–185 (2008).
Kelly, A. E. & Rodriguez, R. R. Publicly committing oneself to an identity. Basic. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 185–191 (2006).
Petre, C. E. The relationship between Internet use and self-concept clarity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology 15, https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-2-4 (2021).
Appel, M., Schreiner, C., Weber, S., Mara, M. & Gnambs, T. Intensity of Facebook use is associated with lower self-concept clarity: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. J. Media Psychol. 30, 160–172 (2018).
Talaifar, S. & Lowery, B. S. Freedom and constraint in digital environments: implications for the self. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 18, 544–575 (2022).
West, M., Rice, S. & Vella-Brodrick, D. Mid-adolescents’ social media use: supporting and suppressing autonomy. J. Adolesc. Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584231168402 (2023).
Grasmuck, S., Martin, J. & Zhao, S. Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 15, 158–188 (2009).
DeVito, M. A., Walker, A. M. & Birnholtz, J. ‘Too Gay for Facebook’: presenting LGBTQ+ identity throughout the personal social media ecosystem. Proc. ACM Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2, 1–23 (2018).
Ellison, N., Heino, R. & Gibbs, E. Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 11, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x (2006).
Hancock, J. T. in Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (eds Joinson, A. et al.) 287–301 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
Davidson, B. I. & Joinson, A. N. Shape shifting across social media. Soc. Media + Society 7, 205630512199063 (2021).
Davis, J. L. Triangulating the self: identity processes in a connected era: triangulating the self. Symbolic Interaction 37, 500–523 (2014).
Allen, B. J., Stratman, Z. E., Kerr, B. R., Zhao, Q. & Moreno, M. A. Associations between psychosocial measures and digital media use among transgender youth: cross-sectional study. JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 4, e25801 (2021).
Haimson, O. L. Mapping gender transition sentiment patterns via social media data: toward decreasing transgender mental health disparities. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26, 749–758 (2019).
Harter, S. The Construction of the Self: Developmental and Sociocultural Foundations (Guilford Press, 2012).
Crone, E. A., Green, K. H., van de Groep, I. H. & van der Cruijsen, R. A neurocognitive model of self-concept development in adolescence. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 4, 273–295 (2022). This extensive review discusses how adolescence is an important time for self-concept development.
Pfeifer, J. H. & Peake, S. J. Self-development: integrating cognitive, socioemotional, and neuroimaging perspectives. Deve. Cognit. Neurosci. 2, 55–69 (2012).
Sebastian, C., Burnett, S. & Blakemore, S.-J. Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends Cognit. Sci. 12, 441–446 (2008).
Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Luyckx, K. & Meeus, W. Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: from three dimensions to five statuses. J. Youth Adolesc. 37, 983–996 (2008).
Morita, H., Griffioen, N. & Granic, I. in Handbook of Adolescent Digital Media Use and Mental Health (eds Nesi, J., Telzer, E. H. & Prinstein, M. J.) 63–84 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A. & Blakemore, S.-J. Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Dev. Sci. 13, 331–338 (2010).
Weil, L. G. et al. The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 264–271 (2013).
Moses-Payne, M. E., Chierchia, G. & Blakemore, S.-J. Age-related changes in the impact of valence on self-referential processing in female adolescents and young adults. Cognit. Dev. 61, 101128 (2022).
Scheuplein, M. et al. Perspective taking and memory for self- and town-related information in male adolescents and young adults. Cognit. Dev. 67, 101356 (2023).
Rodman, A. M., Powers, K. E. & Somerville, L. H. Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13158–13163 (2017).
Lee, A. Y., Mieczkowski, H., Ellison, N. B. & Hancock, J. T. The algorithmic crystal: conceptualizing the self through algorithmic personalization on TikTok. Proc. ACM Hum.–Comput. Interact. 6, 1–22 (2022).
Thomaes, S. et al. I like me if you like me: on the interpersonal modulation and regulation of preadolescents’ state self-esteem. Child. Dev. 81, 811–825 (2010).
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J. & Schouten, A. P. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9, 584–590 (2006).
Kwan, I. et al. Cyberbullying and children and young people’s mental health: a systematic map of systematic reviews. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 23, 72–82 (2020).
Przybylski, A. K. & Bowes, L. Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Child. Adolesc. Health 1, 19–26 (2017).
Peters, S. et al. Social media use and the not-so-imaginary audience: behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying the influence on self-concept. Dev. Cognit. Neurosci. 48, 100921 (2021).
Wood, J. V. What is social comparison and how should we study it? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22, 520–537 (1996).
Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L. & Suleiman, A. B. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature 554, 441–450 (2018).
Ferguson, A. M., Turner, G. & Orben, A. Social uncertainty in the digital world. Trends Cognit. Sci. 28, 286–289 (2024).
Blease, C. R. Too many ‘friends,’ too few ‘likes’? Evolutionary psychology and ‘Facebook depression’. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19, 1–13 (2015).
Lee, H. Y. et al. Getting fewer “likes” than others on social media elicits emotional distress among victimized adolescents. Child. Dev. 91, 2141–2159 (2020).
Nesi, J. & Prinstein, M. J. In search of likes: longitudinal associations between adolescents’ digital status seeking and health-risk behaviors. J. Clin. Child. Adolesc. Psychol. 48, 740–748 (2019).
Carr, C. T., Hayes, R. A. & Sumner, E. M. Predicting a threshold of perceived Facebook post success via likes and reactions: a test of explanatory mechanisms. Commun. Res. Rep. 35, 141–151 (2018).
Noon, E. J. & Meier, A. Inspired by friends: adolescents’ network homophily moderates the relationship between social comparison, envy, and inspiration on instagram. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 22, 787–793 (2019).
Schreurs, L., Meier, A. & Vandenbosch, L. Exposure to the positivity bias and adolescents’ differential longitudinal links with social comparison, inspiration and envy depending on social media literacy. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03893-3 (2022).
Meier, A. & Krause, H.-V. Does passive social media use harm well-being? An adversarial review. J. Media Psychol. 35, 169–180 (2023).
Nesi, J. & Prinstein, M. J. Using social media for social comparison and feedback-seeking: gender and popularity moderate associations with depressive symptoms. J. Abnorm. Child. Psychol. 43, 1427–1438 (2015).
Lindström, B. et al. A computational reward learning account of social media engagement. Nat. Commun. 12, 1311 (2021).
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R. & Halliwell, E. Social comparisons on social media: the impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image 13, 38–45 (2015).
Scully, M., Swords, L. & Nixon, E. Social comparisons on social media: online appearance-related activity and body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls. Ir. J. Psychol. Med. 40, 31–42 (2023).
Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L. & Crusius, J. The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 9, 44–49 (2016).
Meier, A. & Johnson, B. K. Social comparison and envy on social media: a critical review. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 45, 101302 (2022).
Verduyn, P., Gugushvili, N., Massar, K., Täht, K. & Kross, E. Social comparison on social networking sites. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 36, 32–37 (2020).
Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S. & Possler, D. Instagram inspiration: how upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. J. Commun. 70, 721–743 (2020).
Vaterlaus, J. M., Patten, E. V., Roche, C. & Young, J. A. #Gettinghealthy: the perceived influence of social media on young adult health behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 151–157 (2015).
Valkenburg, P. M., Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., Van Driel, I. I. & Keijsers, L. Social media browsing and adolescent well-being: challenging the “passive social media use hypothesis”. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab015 (2022).
Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G. & Duckett, E. Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: disengagement and transformation. Dev. Psychol. 32, 744–754 (1996).
Sebastian, C., Viding, E., Williams, K. D. & Blakemore, S.-J. Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence. Brain Cogn. 72, 134–145 (2010).
Sebastian, C. et al. Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: implications of social neuroscience for education. NeuroImage 57, 686–694 (2011).
Somerville, L. H. The teenage brain: sensitivity to social evaluation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 121–127 (2013).
Larson, R. W. & How, U. S. Children and adolescents spend time: what it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 160–164 (2001).
Thomas, L. A., De Bellis, M. D., Graham, R. & LaBar, K. S. Development of emotional facial recognition in late childhood and adolescence. Dev. Sci. 10, 547–558 (2007).
Gunther Moor, B., van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Crone, E. A. & Van der Molen, M. W. Do you like me? Neural correlates of social evaluation and developmental trajectories. Soc. Neurosci. 5, 461–482 (2010).
Silk, J. S. et al. Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 93–105 (2012).
Gao, S., Assink, M., Cipriani, A. & Lin, K. Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 57, 59–74 (2017).
Prinstein, M. J., Nesi, J. & Telzer, E. H. Commentary: an updated agenda for the study of digital media use and adolescent development—future directions following Odgers & Jensen (2020). J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatr. 61, 349–352 (2020).
Meshi, D., Morawetz, C. & Heekeren, H. R. Nucleus accumbens response to gains in reputation for the self relative to gains for others predicts social media use. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 1–11 (2013).
Crone, E. A. & Dahl, R. E. Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 636–650 (2012).
Platt, B., Kadosh, K. C. & Lau, J. Y. F. The role of peer rejection in adolescent depression. Depress. Anxiety 30, 809–821 (2013).
Will, G.-J., Rutledge, R. B., Moutoussis, M. & Dolan, R. J. Neural and computational processes underlying dynamic changes in self-esteem. eLife 6, e28098 (2017).
Macrynikola, N. & Miranda, R. Active Facebook use and mood: when digital interaction turns maladaptive. Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 271–279 (2019).
Grunewald, K., Deng, J., Wertz, J. & Schweizer, S. The effect of online social evaluation on mood and cognition in young people. Sci. Rep. 12, 20999 (2022).
Andrews, J. L., Khin, A. C., Crayn, T., Humphreys, K. & Schweizer, S. Measuring online and offline social rejection sensitivity in the digital age. Psychol. Assess. 34, 742–751 (2022).
Forest, A. L. & Wood, J. V. When social networking is not working: individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychol. Sci. 23, 295–302 (2012).
Valkenburg, P. M., Koutamanis, M. & Vossen, H. G. M. The concurrent and longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ use of social network sites and their social self-esteem. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 35–41 (2017).
Burrow, A. L. & Rainone, N. How many likes did I get? purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69, 232–236 (2017).
Seo, M., Kim, J. & Yang, H. Frequent interaction and fast feedback predict perceived social support: using crawled and self-reported data of Facebook users. J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 21, 282–297 (2016).
Fuhrmann, D., Casey, C. S., Speekenbrink, M. & Blakemore, S.-J. Social exclusion affects working memory performance in young adolescent girls. Dev. Cognit. Neurosci. 40, 100718 (2019).
Blakemore, S.-J. & Choudhury, S. Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiat 47, 296–312 (2006).
Dreyfuss, M. et al. Teens impulsively react rather than retreat from threat. Dev. Neurosci. 36, 220–227 (2014).
Guyer, A. E., Choate, V. R., Pine, D. S. & Nelson, E. E. Neural circuitry underlying affective response to peer feedback in adolescence. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 81–92 (2012).
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M. & Dapretto, M. The power of the like in adolescence: effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychol. Sci. 27, 1027–1035 (2016).
van Harmelen, A.-L. et al. Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort. Psychol. Med. 47, 2312–2322 (2017).
Chu, P. S., Saucier, D. A. & Hafner, E. Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 29, 624–645 (2010).
Schneider, F. M. et al. Social media ostracism: the effects of being excluded online. Comput. Hum. Behav. 73, 385–393 (2017).
Reich, S., Schneider, F. M. & Heling, L. Zero likes—symbolic interactions and need satisfaction online. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 97–102 (2018).
Lutz, S. & Schneider, F. M. Is receiving dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychol. 24, 741–765 (2021).
Lutz, S. Why don’t you answer me? Exploring the effects of (repeated exposure to) ostracism via messengers on users’ fundamental needs, well-being, and coping motivation. Media Psychol. 26, 113–140 (2023).
Rodríguez-Hidalgo, C. T., Tan, E. S. H., Verlegh, P. W. J., Beyens, I. & Kühne, R. Don’t stress me now: assessing the regulatory impact of face-to-face and online feedback prosociality on stress during an important life event. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 25, 307–327 (2020).
Trepte, S., Dienlin, T. & Reinecke, L. Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: a longitudinal study. Media Psychol. 18, 74–105 (2015).
Dredge, R. & Schreurs, L. Social media use and offline interpersonal outcomes during youth: a systematic literature review. Mass. Commun. Soc. 23, 885–911 (2020).
Colasante, T., Lin, L., De France, K. & Hollenstein, T. Any time and place? Digital emotional support for digital natives. Am. Psychol. 77, 186–195 (2022).
Pouwels, J. L., Valkenburg, P. M., Beyens, I., Van Driel, I. I. & Keijsers, L. Social media use and friendship closeness in adolescents’ daily lives: an experience sampling study. Dev. Psychol. 57, 309–323 (2021).
Mills, K. L. et al. Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: convergence across four longitudinal samples. NeuroImage 141, 273–281 (2016).
Tamnes, C. K. et al. Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: a multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness. J. Neurosci. 37, 3402–3412 (2017).
Larsen, B. & Luna, B. Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 94, 179–195 (2018).
Petanjek, Z. et al. Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13281–13286 (2011).
Cohen, J. R. et al. A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 669–671 (2010).
Ernst, M. et al. Amygdala and nucleus accumbens in responses to receipt and omission of gains in adults and adolescents. NeuroImage 25, 1279–1291 (2005).
Galván, A. & McGlennen, K. M. Enhanced striatal sensitivity to aversive reinforcement in adolescents versus adults. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 25, 284–296 (2013).
Braams, B. R., Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Peper, J. S. & Crone, E. A. Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior. J. Neurosci. 35, 7226–7238 (2015).
Schreuders, E. et al. Contributions of reward sensitivity to ventral striatum activity across adolescence and early adulthood. Child. Dev. 89, 797–810 (2018).
Maza, M. T. et al. Association of habitual checking behaviors on social media with longitudinal functional brain development. JAMA Pediatr. 177, 160–167 (2023).
Miller, J., Mills, K. L., Vuorre, M., Orben, A. & Przybylski, A. K. Impact of digital screen media activity on functional brain organization in late childhood: evidence from the ABCD study. Cortex 169, 290–308 (2023).
Flayelle, M. et al. A taxonomy of technology design features that promote potentially addictive online behaviours. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 136–150 (2023).
Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R. & Heim, C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 434–445 (2009).
Gunnar, M. R., Wewerka, S., Frenn, K., Long, J. D. & Griggs, C. Developmental changes in hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal activity over the transition to adolescence: normative changes and associations with puberty. Dev. Psychopathol. 21, 69–85 (2009).
Somerville, L. H. et al. The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1554–1562 (2013).
Stroud, L. R. et al. Stress response and the adolescent transition: performance versus peer rejection stressors. Dev. Psychopathol. 21, 47–68 (2009).
Avital, A. & Richter-Levin, G. Exposure to juvenile stress exacerbates the behavioural consequences of exposure to stress in the adult rat. Int. J. Neuropsychopharm. 8, 163–173 (2005).
McCormick, C. M., Mathews, I. Z., Thomas, C. & Waters, P. Investigations of HPA function and the enduring consequences of stressors in adolescence in animal models. Brain Cogn. 72, 73–85 (2010).
Eiland, L. & Romeo, R. D. Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience 249, 162–171 (2013).
Romeo, R. D. The teenage brain. Curr. Direc. Psychol. Sci. 22, 140–145 (2013).
Afifi, T. D., Zamanzadeh, N., Harrison, K. & Acevedo Callejas, M. WIRED: the impact of media and technology use on stress (cortisol) and inflammation (interleukin IL-6) in fast paced families. Comput. Hum. Behav. 81, 265–273 (2018).
Morin-Major, J. K. et al. Facebook behaviors associated with diurnal cortisol in adolescents: is befriending stressful? Psychoneuroendocrinology 63, 238–46 (2016).
Ghai, S. It’s time to reimagine sample diversity and retire the WEIRD dichotomy. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 971–972 (2021).
Munafò, M. R. & Davey Smith, G. Robust research needs many lines of evidence. Nature 553, 399–401 (2018).
Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S. & Johnson, K. L. The fundamental importance of method to theory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 55–66 (2022).
Parry, D. A., Fisher, J. T., Mieczkowski, H., Sewall, C. J. R. & Davidson, B. I. Social media and well-being: a methodological perspective. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 45, 101285 (2022).
Will, G.-J. et al. Neurocomputational mechanisms underpinning aberrant social learning in young adults with low self-esteem. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 96 (2020).
Walther, J. B. Affordances, effects, and technology errors. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 36, 190–193 (2013).
Piray, P. & Daw, N. D. A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility. Nat. Commun. 12, 6587 (2021).
Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design (Harvard Univ. Press, 1979).
Slater, M. D. Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Commun. Theory 17, 281–303 (2007).
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J. & Walther, J. B. Media effects: theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 315–338 (2016).
Aalbers, G., McNally, R. J., Heeren, A., De Wit, S. & Fried, E. I. Social media and depression symptoms: a network perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148, 1454–1462 (2019).
Ghai, S., Fassi, L., Awadh, F. & Orben, A. Lack of sample diversity in research on adolescent depression and social media use: a scoping review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 11, 759–772 (2023).
Cramer, A. O. J. et al. Major depression as a complex dynamic system. PLoS ONE 11, e0167490 (2016).
Kendler, K. S., Zachar, P. & Craver, C. What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders? Psychol. Med. 41, 1143–1150 (2011).
van de Leemput, I. A. et al. Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 111, 87–92 (2014).
Trepte, S. The social media privacy model: privacy and communication in the light of social media affordances. Commun. Theory 31, 549–570 (2021).
Reinecke, L. et al. Permanently online and permanently connected: development and validation of the Online Vigilance Scale. PLoS ONE 13, e0205384 (2018).
Trieu, P., Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. & Falk, E. Who likes to be reachable? Availability preferences, weak ties, and bridging social capital. Inform. Commun. Soc. 22, 1096–1111 (2019).
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32, 554–571 (1986).
Rhee, L., Bayer, J. B., Lee, D. S. & Kuru, O. Social by definition: how users define social platforms and why it matters. Telemat. Inform. 59, 101538 (2021).
Valkenburg, P. M. Understanding self-effects in social media: self-effects in social media. Hum. Commun. Res. 43, 477–490 (2017).
Thorson, K. & Wells, C. Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age: curated flows. Commun. Theor. 26, 309–328 (2016).
Zhao, H. & Wagner, C. How TikTok leads users to flow experience: investigating the effects of technology affordances with user experience level and video length as moderators. INTR 33, 820–849 (2023).
Carr, C. T., Wohn, D. Y. & Hayes, R. A. As social support: relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 385–393 (2016).
Rice, R. E. et al. Organizational media affordances: operationalization and associations with media use: organizational media affordances. J. Commun. 67, 106–130 (2017).
Scissors, L., Burke, M. & Wengrovitz, S. in Proc. 19th ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing—CSCW ’16 1499–1508 (ACM Press, 2016).
Boyd, D. M. in A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture in Social Networking Sites (ed. Papacharissi, Z.) 35–58 (Routledge, 2011).
Valkenburg, P. M. in Handbook of Adolescent Digital Media Use and Mental Health (eds Nesi, J., Telzer, E. H. & Prinstein, M. J.) 39–60 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Dennis, Fuller & Valacich, Media Tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q. 32, 575 (2008).
DeAndrea, D. C. Advancing warranting theory: advancing warranting theory. Commun. Theor. 24, 186–204 (2014).
Uhlhaas, P. J. et al. Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap. Mol. Psychiatry 28, 3171–3181 (2023).
Kachuri, L. et al. Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 8–25 (2024).
Weinstein, E. C. & Selman, R. L. Digital stress: adolescents’ personal accounts. N. Media Soc. 18, 391–409 (2016).
Steele, R. G., Hall, J. A. & Christofferson, J. L. Conceptualizing digital stress in adolescents and young adults: toward the development of an empirically based model. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 23, 15–26 (2020).
Nick, E. A. et al. Adolescent digital stress: frequencies, correlates, and longitudinal association with depressive symptoms. J. Adolesc. Health 70, 336–339 (2022).
Van Der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E. & Sumter, S. R. Social media use, social media stress, and sleep: examining cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships in adolescents. Health Commun. 34, 552–559 (2019).
Fabio, S. & Sonja, P. Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. J. Youth Adolesc. 42, 739–750 (2013).
Tokunaga, R. S. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 277–287 (2010).
Khetawat, D. & Steele, R. G. Examining the association between digital stress components and psychological wellbeing: a meta-analysis. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 26, 957–974 (2023).
Beyens, I., Frison, E. & Eggermont, S. “I don’t want to miss a thing”: adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64, 1–8 (2016).
Wartberg, L., Thomasius, R. & Paschke, K. The relevance of emotion regulation, procrastination, and perceived stress for problematic social media use in a representative sample of children and adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 121, 106788 (2021).
Winstone, L., Mars, B., Haworth, C. M. A. & Kidger, J. Types of social media use and digital stress in early adolescence. J. Early Adolescence 43, 294–319 (2023).
West, M., Rice, S. & Vella-Brodrick, D. Exploring the “social” in social media: adolescent relatedness—thwarted and supported. J. Adolesc. Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211062158 (2021).
Gilbert, A., Baumgartner, S. E. & Reinecke, L. Situational boundary conditions of digital stress: goal conflict and autonomy frustration make smartphone use more stressful. Mob. Media Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221138017 (2022).
Freytag, A. et al. Permanently online—always stressed out? The effects of permanent connectedness on stress experiences. Hum. Commun. Res. 47, 132–165 (2021).
Johannes, N. et al. The relationship between online vigilance and affective well-being in everyday life: combining smartphone logging with experience sampling. Media Psychol. 24, 581–605 (2021).
Reinecke, L. et al. Digital stress over the life span: the effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a german probability sample. Media Psychol. 20, 90–115 (2017).
Schönbach, K. in The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (eds Rössler, P., Hoffner, C. A. & Zoonen, L.) 1–11 (Wiley, 2017).
Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L. & Evans, T. W. Mood-congruent judgment is a general effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 119–132 (1992).
Ferster, C. B. A functional analysis of depression. Am. Psychol. 28, 857–870 (1973).
Carvalho, J. P. & Hopko, D. R. Behavioral theory of depression: reinforcement as a mediating variable between avoidance and depression. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 42, 154–162 (2011).
Helbig-Lang, S. & Petermann, F. Tolerate or eliminate? A systematic review on the effects of safety behavior across anxiety disorders. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 17, 218–233 (2010).
Marciano, L., Driver, C. C., Schulz, P. J. & Camerini, A.-L. Dynamics of adolescents’ smartphone use and well-being are positive but ephemeral. Sci. Rep. 12, 1316 (2022).
Rao, P. A. et al. Social anxiety disorder in childhood and adolescence: descriptive psychopathology. Behav. Res. Ther. 45, 1181–1191 (2007).
Corning, A. F., Krumm, A. J. & Smitham, L. A. Differential social comparison processes in women with and without eating disorder symptoms. J. Couns. Psychol. 53, 338–349 (2006).
Radovic, A., Gmelin, T., Stein, B. D. & Miller, E. Depressed adolescents’ positive and negative use of social media. J. Adolesc. 55, 5–15 (2017).
Acknowledgements
A.O. and T.D. were funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00030/13). A.O. was funded by the Jacobs Foundation and a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/X034925/1). S.-J.B. is funded by Wellcome (grant numbers WT107496/Z/15/Z and WT227882/Z/23/Z), the MRC, the Jacobs Foundation, the Wellspring Foundation and the University of Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.O. conceptualized the manuscript; A.O and A.M wrote the original draft; A.O., A.M., T.D. and S.-J.B. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed substantially to discussion of the content, and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Emily Weinstein, who co-reviewed with Beck Tench; Nastasia Griffioen; and Margarita Panayiotou for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Orben, A., Meier, A., Dalgleish, T. et al. Mechanisms linking social media use to adolescent mental health vulnerability. Nat Rev Psychol 3, 407–423 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00307-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00307-y
This article is cited by
-
Digital self-presentation and adolescent mental health: Cross-sectional and longitudinal insights from the “LifeOnSoMe”-study
BMC Public Health (2024)
-
Enhancing brain health in the global south through a sex and gender lens
Nature Mental Health (2024)
-
Within-Person Fluctuations in Objective Smartphone Use and Emotional Processes During Adolescence: An Intensive Longitudinal Study
Affective Science (2024)