Abstract
Many attempts to scale conservation actions have failed to deliver their intended benefits, caused unintended harm or later been abandoned, hampering efforts to bend the curve on biodiversity loss. Here we encourage those calling for scaling to pause and reflect on past scaling efforts, which offer valuable lessons: the total impact of an action depends on both its effectiveness and scalability; effectiveness can change depending on scale for multiple reasons; feedback processes can change socio-ecological conditions influencing future adoption; and the drive to scale can incentivize bad practices that undermine long-term outcomes. Cutting across these themes is the recognition that monitoring scaling can enhance evidence-informed adaptive management, reporting and research. We draw on evidence and concepts from disparate fields, explore new linkages between often isolated concepts and suggest strategies for practitioners, policymakers and researchers. Reflecting on these five lessons may help in the scaling of effective conservation actions in responsible ways to meet the triple goals of reversing biodiversity loss, combating climate change and supporting human wellbeing.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
133,45 € per year
only 11,12 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langhammer, P. F. et al. The positive impact of conservation action. Science 384, 453–458 (2024).
Bradshaw, C. J. A. et al. Underestimating the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future. Front. Conserv. Sci. 1, 615419 (2021).
Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).
Newing, H. & Perram, A. What do you know about conservation and human rights? Oryx 53, 595–596 (2019).
Baldwin-Cantello, W. et al. The triple challenge: synergies, trade-offs and integrated responses for climate, biodiversity, and human wellbeing goals. Clim. Policy 23, 782–799 (2023).
Mascia, M. B. & Mills, M. When conservation goes viral: the diffusion of innovative biodiversity conservation policies and practices. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12442 (2018).
Oldekop, J. A., Sims, K. R. E., Karna, B. K., Whittingham, M. J. & Agrawal, A. Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal. Nat. Sustain. 2, 421–428 (2019).
Gelcich, S. et al. Fishers’ perceptions on the Chilean coastal TURF system after two decades: problems, benefits, and emerging needs. Bull. Mar. Sci. 93, 53–67 (2017).
Romero, P. & Melo, O. Can a territorial use right for fisheries management make a difference for fishing communities? Mar. Policy 124, 104359 (2021).
Friess, D. A. et al. Achieving ambitious mangrove restoration targets will need a transdisciplinary and evidence-informed approach. One Earth 5, 456–460 (2022).
Coleman, E. A. et al. Limited effects of tree planting on forest canopy cover and rural livelihoods in Northern India. Nat. Sustain. 4, 997–1004 (2021).
West, T. A. P. et al. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381, 873–877 (2023).
Bluwstein, J. et al. Between dependence and deprivation: the interlocking nature of land alienation in Tanzania. J. Agar. Change 18, 806–830 (2018).
Homewood, K., Nielsen, M. R. & Keane, A. Women, wellbeing and Wildlife Management Areas in Tanzania. J. Peasant Stud. 49, 335–362 (2022).
Keane, A. et al. Impact of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas on household wealth. Nat. Sustain. 3, 226–233 (2020).
O’Garra, T. et al. National-level evaluation of a community-based marine management initiative. Nat. Sustain. 6, 908–918 (2023).
Larrosa, C., Carrasco, L. R. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Unintended feedbacks: challenges and opportunities for improving conservation effectiveness. Conserv. Lett. 9, 316–326 (2016).
Polasky, S. You can’t always get what you want: conservation planning with feedback effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5245–5246 (2006).
Pearson, D. E., Clark, T. J. & Hahn, P. G. Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13734 (2022).
Saeed, A.-R., McDermott, C. & Boyd, E. Are REDD+ community forest projects following the principles for collective action, as proposed by Ostrom? Int. J. Commons 11, 572–596 (2017).
Bayrak, M. & Marafa, L. Ten years of REDD+: a critical review of the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability 8, 620 (2016).
Massarella, K., Sallu, S. M., Ensor, J. E. & Marchant, R. REDD+, hype, hope and disappointment: the dynamics of expectations in conservation and development pilot projects. World Dev. 109, 375–385 (2018).
Fleischman, F. et al. How politics shapes the outcomes of forest carbon finance. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 51, 7–14 (2021).
Gurney, G. G. et al. Poverty and protected areas: an evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 98–107 (2014).
Catalano, A. S., Lyons-White, J., Mills, M. M. & Knight, A. T. Learning from published project failures in conservation. Biol. Conserv. 238, 108223 (2019).
Woltering, L., Fehlenberg, K., Gerard, B., Ubels, J. & Cooley, L. Scaling—from “reaching many” to sustainable systems change at scale: a critical shift in mindset. Agric. Syst. 176, 102652 (2019).
Higginbottom, T. P., Adhikari, R., Dimova, R., Redicker, S. & Foster, T. Performance of large-scale irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Sustain. 4, 501–508 (2021).
McLean, R. & Gargani, J. Scaling Impact: Innovation for the Public Good (Routledge, 2019).
Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth 4, 75–87 (2021).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 1027–1034 (2021).
Salafsky, N. et al. A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions. Conserv. Biol. 22, 897–911 (2008).
Conservation Actions Classification (V1.0) https://conservationstandards.org/library-item/conservation-actions-classification-v1-0/#:~:text=Conservation%20Actions%20are%20interventions%20undertaken,setting%20up%20a%20protected%20area (Conservation Standards, 2019).
Lam, D. P. M. et al. Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform. 2, 3 (2020).
Moore, M.-L., Riddell, D. & Vocisano, D.Scaling out, scaling up, scaling deep: strategies of non-profits in advancing systemic social innovation.J. Corp. Citizenship 58, 67–84 (2015).
Salafsky, N. & Margoluis, R. Pathways to Success: Taking Conservation to Scale in Complex Systems (Island Press, 2021).
Mills, M. et al. How conservation initiatives go to scale. Nat. Sustain. 2, 935–940 (2019).
Hartmann, A. & Linn, J. F. Scaling Up: a Framework and Lessons for Development Effectiveness from Literature and Practice (Wolfensohn Center for Development, 2008).
Geels, F. W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31, 1257–1274 (2002).
Lambin, E. F., Kim, H., Leape, J. & Lee, K. Scaling up solutions for a sustainability transition. One Earth 3, 89–96 (2020).
Nielsen, K. S. et al. How psychology can help limit climate change. Am. Psychol. 76, 130–144 (2021).
Klöckner, C. A. & Blöbaum, A. A comprehensive action determination model: toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 574–586 (2010).
Delaroche, M. Adoption of conservation practices: what have we learned from two decades of social-psychological approaches? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 45, 25–35 (2020).
Green, K. M., Crawford, B. A., Williamson, K. A. & DeWan, A. A. A meta-analysis of social marketing campaigns to improve global conservation outcomes. Soc. Mark. Q. 25, 69–87 (2019).
Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations 5th edn (Simon and Schuster, 2003).
Wigboldus, S. & Leeuwis, C. Towards Responsible Scaling Up and Out in Agricultural Development: An Exploration of Concepts and Principles (Centre for Development Innovation, 2013).
Markard, J., Raven, R. & Truffer, B. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41, 955–967 (2012).
Tsing, A. L. On nonscalability: the living world is not amenable to precision-nested scales. Common Knowl. 18, 505–524 (2012).
Young, K. J. in Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty (ed. Montagnini, F.) 179–209 (Springer International, 2017).
Spatz, D. R. et al. The global contribution of invasive vertebrate eradication as a key island restoration tool. Sci. Rep. 12, 13391 (2022).
Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L. V., Petrovan, S. O. & Smith, R. K. What Works in Conservation 2021 (Open Book Publishers, 2021).
Tauli, J. C. Only a human rights-based approach will address biodiversity loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1050–1051 (2022).
Pienkowski, T. et al. Supporting conservationists’ mental health through better working conditions. Conserv. Biol. 37, e14097 (2023).
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).
Geels, F. W. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 1, 24–40 (2011).
Owen, R. et al. in Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 27–50 (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
Pettorelli, N. et al. Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2384–2393 (2021).
Pullin, A. S. & Knight, T. M. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv. Biol. 15, 50–54 (2001).
Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. & Knight, T. M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 305–308 (2004).
Nielsen, K. S. et al. Improving climate change mitigation analysis: a framework for examining feasibility. One Earth 3, 325–336 (2020).
Nielsen, K. S., Nicholas, K. A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Energy 6, 1011–1016 (2021).
Battista, W., Tourgee, A., Wu, C. & Fujita, R. How to achieve conservation outcomes at scale: an evaluation of scaling principles. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 278 (2017).
Romero-de-Diego, C. et al. Drivers of adoption and spread of wildlife management initiatives in Mexico. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e438 (2021).
Lewis-Brown, E. et al. The importance of future generations and conflict management in conservation.Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e488 (2021).
Clark, M., Andrews, J. & Hillis, V. A quantitative application of diffusion of innovations for modeling the spread of conservation behaviors. Ecol. Model. 473, 110145 (2022).
Abernethy, K. E., Bodin, Ö., Olsson, P., Hilly, Z. & Schwarz, A. Two steps forward, two steps back: the role of innovation in transforming towards community-based marine resource management in Solomon Islands. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 309–321 (2014).
Pienkowski, T. et al. Spatial predictors of landowners’ engagement in the restoration of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bxdzm (2024).
Piñeiro, V. et al. A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nat. Sustain. 3, 809–820 (2020).
Pannell, D. J. et al. Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 46, 1407–1424 (2006).
Sutherland, W. J. et al. Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: the Conservation Evidence database. Biol. Conserv. 238, 108199 (2019).
Sutherland, W. J. & Wordley, C. F. R. Evidence complacency hampers conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1215–1216 (2017).
Cook, C. N., Hockings, M. & Carter, R. W. Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 181–186 (2010).
Steg, L. & Vlek, C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol. 29, 309–317 (2009).
St John, F. A., Edwards-Jones, G. & Jones, J. P. Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildl. Res. 37, 658–667 (2010).
Mahajan, S. L. et al. A theory-based framework for understanding the establishment, persistence, and diffusion of community-based conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e299 (2021).
Christie, A. P. et al. A practical conservation tool to combine diverse types of evidence for transparent evidence-based decision-making. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e579 (2022).
Cook, C. N., Pullin, A. S., Sutherland, W. J., Stewart, G. B. & Carrasco, L. R. Considering cost alongside the effectiveness of management in evidence-based conservation: a systematic reporting protocol. Biol. Conserv. 209, 508–516 (2017).
Jagadish, A., Mills, M. & Mascia, M. B. Catalyzing Conservation at Scale: A Practitioner’s Handbook (version 0.1) (Conservation International & Imperial College London, 2021).
Hofman, J. M., Sharma, A. & Watts, D. J. Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science 355, 486–488 (2017).
Clark, M. et al. Forecasting adoption with epidemiological models can enable adaptively scaling out conservation. One Earth (in the press).
Jørgensen, A. C. S. et al. Forecasting the adoption and spread of a community-based marine management initiative using agent-based models. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.16.599026 (2024).
Jagadish, A. et al. Scaling Indigenous-led natural resource management. Glob. Environ. Change 84, 102799 (2024).
Lund, J. F., Sungusia, E., Mabele, M. B. & Scheba, A. Promising change, delivering continuity: REDD+ as conservation fad. World Dev. 89, 124–139 (2017).
Billé, R. Action without change? On the use and usefulness of pilot experiments in environmental management. S. A. P. I. EN. S 3, 1–6 (2010).
Rampling, E. E., Zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Hawkins, I. & Bull, J. W. Achieving biodiversity net gain by addressing governance gaps underpinning ecological compensation policies. Conserv. Biol. 38, e14198 (2024).
Clark, M., Hamad, H. M., Andrews, J., Hillis, V. & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. Quantifying local perceptions of environmental change and links to community-based conservation practices. Conserv. Biol. 38, e14259 (2024).
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Caro, T. & Ngwali, A. S. A silver lining to REDD: institutional growth despite programmatic failure. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e312 (2021).
Skinner, C. A. et al. Social Outcomes of the CARE–WWF Alliance in Mozambique: Research Findings from a Decade of Integrated Conservation and Development Programming (CARE Evaluations, 2019).
Breaugh, J., McBride, K., Kleinaltenkamp, M. & Hammerschmid, G. Beyond diffusion: a systematic literature review of innovation scaling. Sustainability 13, 13528 (2021).
Roe, D., Nelson, F. & Sandbrook, C. Community Management of Natural Resources in Africa: Impacts, Experiences and Future Directions (International Institute for Environment and Development, 2009).
Government of Kenya. Kenyan Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013 (2013).
Government of Malawi. Forestry Act, 1997 (1997).
Meadows, D. Places to intervene in a system. Whole Earth 91, 78–84 (1997).
Abson, D. J. et al. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46, 30–39 (2017).
Lenton, T. M. et al. Operationalising positive tipping points towards global sustainability. Glob. Sustain. 5, e1 (2022).
Carpenter, C. Power in Conservation: Environmental Anthropology Beyond Political Ecology 1st edn (Routledge, 2020).
Shackleton, R. T. et al. Navigating power in conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12877 (2023).
Dandy, N., Fiorini, S. & Davies, A. L. Agenda-setting and power in collaborative natural resource management. Environ. Conserv. 41, 311–320 (2014).
Shibaike, T. Small NGOs and agenda-setting in global conservation governance: the case of pangolin conservation. Glob. Environ. Polit. 22, 45–69 (2022).
Tallis, H. & Lubchenco, J. Working together: a call for inclusive conservation. Nature 515, 27–28 (2014).
Sandbrook, C. Weak yet strong: the uneven power relations of conservation. Oryx 51, 379–380 (2017).
Crosman, K. M., Singh, G. G. & Lang, S. Confronting complex accountability in conservation with communities. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 709423 (2021).
Benjaminsen, T. A., Goldman, M. J., Minwary, M. Y. & Maganga, F. P. Wildlife management in Tanzania: state control, rent seeking and community resistance. Dev. Change 44, 1087–1109 (2013).
Green, K. E. & Adams, W. M. Green grabbing and the dynamics of local-level engagement with neoliberalization in Tanzania’s wildlife management areas. J. Peasant Stud. 42, 97–117 (2015).
Bluwstein, J. & Lund, J. F. Territoriality by conservation in the Selous–Niassa Corridor in Tanzania. World Dev. 101, 453–465 (2018).
Schetter, C., Mkutu, K. & Müller-Koné, M. Frontier NGOs: conservancies, control, and violence in northern Kenya. World Dev. 151, 105735 (2022).
Cannon, J. Allegations of displacement, violence beleaguer Kenyan conservancy NGO. Mongabay https://news.mongabay.com/2021/11/allegations-of-displacement-violence-beleaguer-kenyan-conservancy-ngo/ (2021).
International Labour Organization. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (1989).
Bennett, N. J. et al. Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12640 (2019).
Bixler, R. P. et al. Network governance for large-scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 165–171 (2016).
The State of Finance for Nature in the G20 Report: Leading by Example to Close the Investment Gap (United Nations Environment Programme, 2022).
Osborne, T. Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: a political ecology of common property forest governance. Geoforum 67, 64–77 (2015).
Rocliffe, S. & Quinlan, R. Why conservation needs a new way to scale. Stanford Social Innovation Review https://ssir.org/articles/entry/why_conservation_needs_a_new_way_to_scale# (2020).
Gurney, G. G. et al. Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs. Nature 595, 646–649 (2021).
McCarthy, M. A. & Possingham, H. P. Active adaptive management for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 21, 956–963 (2007).
Stephenson, P. J. The Holy Grail of biodiversity conservation management: monitoring impact in projects and project portfolios. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17, 182–192 (2019).
Wigboldus, S. et al. Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36, 46 (2016).
Project portfolio. Green Climate Fund https://www.greenclimate.fund/projects?f=field_status:445 (2023).
Annual Report and Accounts 2021 (Fauna and Flora International, 2021).
Conservation International & World Wildlife Fund. PADDDtracker Data Release Version 2.1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4974336. (2021)
Ruiz-Miranda, C. R., Vilchis, L. I. & Swaisgood, R. R. Exit strategies for wildlife conservation: why they are rare and why every institution needs one. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 203–210 (2020).
Le Cornu, E. et al. Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12868 (2023).
Razafimahatratra, H. M., Bignebat, C., David-Benz, H., Bélières, J.-F. & Penot, E. Tryout and (dis)adoption of conservation agriculture. Evidence from Western Madagascar. Land Use Policy 100, 104929 (2021).
Habanyati, E. J., Nyanga, P. H. & Umar, B. B. Factors contributing to disadoption of conservation agriculture among smallholder farmers in Petauke, Zambia. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 41, 91–96 (2019).
Pedzisa, T., Rugube, L., Winter-Nelson, A., Baylis, K. & Mazvimavi, K. Abandonment of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. J. Sustain. Dev. 8, 561–575 (2015).
Overview of all CFMGs https://cfmg.mgee.gov.zm/cfmg/map (Government of Zambia, 2023).
Data Reporting Tool for MEAs—DaRT https://dart.informea.org/ (United Nations Environment Programme, 2023).
Wigboldus, S. & Brouwers, J. Using a Theory of Scaling to Guide Decision Making. Towards a Structured Approach to Support Responsible Scaling of Innovations in the Context of Agrifood Systems (Wageningen University and Research, 2016).
Sartas, M. et al. Scaling Readiness: Concepts, Practices, and Implementation. 1–217 (CGIAR, 2020).
Sartas, M., Schut, M., Proietti, C., Thiele, G. & Leeuwis, C. Scaling readiness: science and practice of an approach to enhance impact of research for development. Agric. Syst. 183, 102874 (2020).
Growing Trees, Growing Leaders! Farmer-Powered, Time-Tested Afforestation https://program.tist.org/ (The International Small Group and Tree Planting Programme, 2023).
Benjamin, E. O. & Blum, M. Participation of smallholders in agrofoestry agri-environmental scheme: a lesson from the rural mount Kenyan region. J. Dev. Areas 49, 127–143 (2015).
Benjamin, E. O. & Sauer, J. The cost effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services—smallholders and agroforestry in Africa. Land Use Policy 71, 293–302 (2018).
De Giusti, G., Kristjanson, P. & Rufino, M. C. Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation practice in smallholder farming: evidence from Kenya. Climatic Change 153, 379–394 (2019).
Buxton, J. et al. Community-driven tree planting greens the neighbouring landscape. Sci. Rep. 11, 18239 (2021).
Masiga, M., Yankel, C. & Iberre, C. The International Small Group Tree Planting Program (TIST) Kenya. Institutional Analysis and Capacity Building of African Agricultural Carbon Projects Case Study (CCAFS, 2012).
Marshall, J. H. Analysing the Dynamics of “Positive Tipping Points” in The International Small Group and Tree Planting Program (TIST) from a Systems Thinking Perspective. MSc thesis, Univ. Exeter (2022).
Benjamin, E. O., Ola, O. & Buchenrieder, G. Does an agroforestry scheme with payment for ecosystem services (PES) economically empower women in sub-Saharan Africa? Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 1–11 (2018).
Benjamin, E. O., Blum, M. & Punt, M. The impact of extension and ecosystem services on smallholder’s credit constraint. J. Dev. Areas 50, 333–350 (2016).
Acknowledgements
T. Pienkowski., M.C. and M.M. thank the Leverhulme Trust for the research grant (RPG-2021-440) that supported this work. This is contribution #9 from the “Insights for Catalyzing Conservation at Scale” initiative.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T. Pienkowski and A. Jagadish conceived the study idea. T. Pienkowski, A. Jagadish, W.B., G.C.B., A.P.C., A.P.E., A. Joglekar, K.S.N., T. Powell, T.W. and M.M. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and visualized the results. M.M. supervised the study. A. Jagadish and M.M. acquired the funding.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks George Holmes, Vanessa Adams and Seerp Wigboldus for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pienkowski, T., Jagadish, A., Battista, W. et al. Five lessons for avoiding failure when scaling in conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 1804–1814 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02507-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02507-4