Will SAT be maintained [message #48996] |
Thu, 09 October 2008 17:44 |
|
Hi,
I understand that the OHF project is moving away from the EF, but that
the SODA sub-project is moving over to eclipse.rt. I am just been
looking at SAT for inclusion in the ORMF project
<http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/> and I am wondering if it will be
actively maintained and supported after the moves. It looks like very
nice technology and I would love to use it, but if the support is going
I have considerations.
All the best,
Joel
--
Joel Rosi-Schwartz
Etish Limited [http://www.etish.org]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^...^
/ o,o \ The proud parents of Useme & ORMF
|) ::: (| Open Requirements Management Framework
====w=w==== [http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Re: Will SAT be maintained [message #49224 is a reply to message #49053] |
Wed, 15 October 2008 22:20 |
Werner Keil Messages: 1087 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Simon/All,
Interesting news, what does it mean, OHF is moving away?
Will some of the projects be hosted elsewhere, or have they found too
little response from the industry/community and are therefore retired?
I now understand partly why the OHF meets OHA proposal I made for ESE
next month was not appreciated by the EC, but as I also tried to get
some other locally quite successful Healthcare Eclipse projects in touch
and using OHF, I certainly am interested to know which standards to rely
on here and which may dissolve or move elsewhere?
A simple refactoring of certain parts like SAT does not sound too
tragic. We've seen that with Mylyn. And while I found some more
concerning issues about that the other day, as such it has been very
successful, even more after moving :-)
Werner
Simon Archer wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
> Yes, SAT will be maintained. There is work being done to move SODA to a
> new home... SAT will become an additional set of bundles in the Equinox
> RT project.
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
> Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I understand that the OHF project is moving away from the EF, but that
>> the SODA sub-project is moving over to eclipse.rt. I am just been
>> looking at SAT for inclusion in the ORMF project
>> <http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/> and I am wondering if it will be
>> actively maintained and supported after the moves. It looks like very
>> nice technology and I would love to use it, but if the support is
>> going I have considerations.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Joel
|
|
|
|
Re: Will SAT be maintained [message #587972 is a reply to message #49053] |
Wed, 15 October 2008 22:20 |
Werner Keil Messages: 1087 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Simon/All,
Interesting news, what does it mean, OHF is moving away?
Will some of the projects be hosted elsewhere, or have they found too
little response from the industry/community and are therefore retired?
I now understand partly why the OHF meets OHA proposal I made for ESE
next month was not appreciated by the EC, but as I also tried to get
some other locally quite successful Healthcare Eclipse projects in touch
and using OHF, I certainly am interested to know which standards to rely
on here and which may dissolve or move elsewhere?
A simple refactoring of certain parts like SAT does not sound too
tragic. We've seen that with Mylyn. And while I found some more
concerning issues about that the other day, as such it has been very
successful, even more after moving :-)
Werner
Simon Archer wrote:
> Hi Joel
>
> Yes, SAT will be maintained. There is work being done to move SODA to a
> new home... SAT will become an additional set of bundles in the Equinox
> RT project.
>
> Thanks
>
> Simon
>
> Joel Rosi-Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I understand that the OHF project is moving away from the EF, but that
>> the SODA sub-project is moving over to eclipse.rt. I am just been
>> looking at SAT for inclusion in the ORMF project
>> <http://www.eclipse.org/ormf/> and I am wondering if it will be
>> actively maintained and supported after the moves. It looks like very
>> nice technology and I would love to use it, but if the support is
>> going I have considerations.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Joel
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03005 seconds