Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
A History of Mathematics, Second Edition 2nd Edition
- ISBN-100471543977
- ISBN-13978-0471543978
- Edition2nd
- PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc
- Publication dateMarch 6, 1991
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.75 x 9.25 inches
- Print length736 pages
Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From the origins of numbering to the future of computing, the authors strive for comprehensive examination and clear, simple explanations. Some of the math will daunt those who have never taken college-level courses (or have forgotten what they learned), but some of the more elaborate technical material can be skipped if needed. Especially helpful is the extensive timeline-appendix that proceeds from the beginning of time to the late 20th century. Whether you're using it to gain a better understanding of mathematics or to broaden your awareness of the historical record, A History of Mathematics will help you make sense of the wide world of numbers. --Rob Lightner
From the Back Cover
Product details
- Publisher : John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2nd edition (March 6, 1991)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 736 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0471543977
- ISBN-13 : 978-0471543978
- Item Weight : 2 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.75 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #760,392 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #476 in Mathematics History
- #1,566 in Mathematics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star77%17%6%0%0%77%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star77%17%6%0%0%17%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star77%17%6%0%0%6%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star77%17%6%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star77%17%6%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
First off, both are excellent reads, and although they cover the same subject they approach it in two different manners. Boyer's text takes the style of a history book to approach the topic. It often focuses on the people and on the time period, commenting on political/cultural going-on. Its an enjoyable book to read, almost in the sense of reading a novel. Usually the mathematics is brought up in the text, but most of the proofs and derivations are often glossed over. Possible many of those mathematical details were in the questions that are no longer at the end of the chapters. But I found missing those details to be somewhat frustrating.
Conversely Burton takes the approach of a mathematics textbook that follows the story line of history. Its filled with proofs and examples, but isn't quite as rich in historical content. Each chapter ends with numerous "homework" problems, often times relating to specific solutions to a problem found by different mathematicians.
Both are excellent books, but depending on your personal taste and interests you may prefer one approach over the other. If you are looking to sit down and work through historical mathematical problems, Burton is probably right for you. If you want to cozy up and imagine what life and thought was like throughout different times in civilization, Boyer is probably your answer.
Hope this is helpful.
It is a pity that the new author did not take the opportunity to expand the book to a much wider scale. ( what I mean is not to a encycoplaedic but at least expand the history of mathematics in the 20 the century. Now back to the book. What makes this book different other ones, I think it is the historical intuition of Boyer makes this book eternal. Some book arrange the content chronologically and somes book arrange the content according to the topics. However, Boyer cleverly combined that two . Also, he also extinctly discuss the topics proportional to their importance in the history. There is not too much mathematics and
there is not too few mathematics, Just a few words to describe that is " that book is really well balanced " and gives you everything and also the range of audience is wide, coupled with the very very reasonable price, it is the book on mathematical history who are interested should own one.
But Boyer also supplied the solution to this problem. Among the books he recommends in the preface of the first edition is a much shorter book by Howard Eves (Foundations and Fundamental Concepts Of Mathematics, ISBN 0-486-69609-X). Eves' book emphasizes the historical development of the most important ideas and methods through more than 2000 years. After reading Eves' book, you can return to Boyer's book and you will appreciate the wealth of details much more because your mind is equipped with a guideline.
There is one other fact worth mentioning about the book. The avaiable second edition has been revised by Uta C. Merzbach and Isaac Asimov has written a foreword. Merzbach left the first 22 chapter virtually unchanged. The chapters about more recent developments have been expanded. In revising the references and the bibliography, Merzbach replaced Boyer's references (often non-English sources) by works in English. That is good for the English-speaking readers, but is it also good for people who are interested in the history of mathematics (which mostly took place in Europe: Greece, Italy, France, Germany) ? The second major change Merzbach made was dropping the exercises. For a history book, this was probably the right decision. But in Eves' book (focused on the development of ideas), the exercises are a valuable means of deepening the understanding of the era and its problems.
To whom can I recommend this book ? I recommend this book to the initiated readers. If you have never heard about the axiomatic method, you should probably first read Eves' book and then return to this one.
So going with her opinion and her "You have to log on right now and buy me another, I can't find mine!" I'm going to say this is 5 star.
I should read it one of these days. I sort of lost interest in reading math books after trying Gödel, Escher, Bach, which turned out to be rather dry for a 6-8 year old.
inference by reader can be made toward history of cultures, cultural anthropology, origin of numbers to modern day math.
Thank you.