Hengel, Erin (2022) Publishing while female: are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. The Economic Journal, 132 (648). pp. 2951-2991. ISSN 0013-0133
|
Text (Publishing while female)
- Accepted Version
Download (999kB) |
Abstract
Female authors are under-represented in top economics journals. In this paper, I investigate whether higher writing standards contribute to the problem. I find that (i) female-authored papers are 1%–6% better written than equivalent papers by men; (ii) the gap widens during peer review; (iii) women improve their writing as they publish more papers (but men do not); (iv) female-authored papers take longer under review. Using a subjective expected utility framework, I argue that higher writing standards for women are consistent with these stylised facts. A counterfactual analysis suggests that senior female economists may, as a result, write at least 5% more clearly than they otherwise would. As a final exercise, I show tentative evidence that women adapt to biased treatment in ways that may disguise it as voluntary choice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2023 Oxford University Press. |
| Divisions: | Social Policy |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2023 16:06 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Dec 2024 03:35 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118208 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |