Gini decompositions and Gini elasticities: On measuring the importance of income sources and population subgroups for income inequality
Simon Jurkatis and
Wolfgang Strehl
No 2014/22, Discussion Papers from Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics
Abstract:
This paper points to flaws in Gini decompositions by income sources and population subgroups and to common pitfalls in the interpretation of decomposition results, focusing on methods within the framework of Rao (1969). We argue that within this framework Gini elasticities may provide the only meaningful way to examine the relevance of income sources or population subgroups for total income inequality. Moreover, we show that existing methods are unsuitable to decompose the trend in the Gini coefficient and provide a coherent method to decompose the Gini trend by income sources. We add to the recent trend of multi-decompositions by deriving Gini elasticities from a simultaneous decomposition by income sources and population subgroups.
Keywords: income inequality; Gini decomposition; Gini elasticity; income sources; population subgroups; multi-decomposition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C43 D31 D33 D63 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pbe
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/102730/1/798627875.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:201422
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().