[go: up one dir, main page]

  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can Changing Economic Factors Explain the Rise in Obesity?

Charles Courtemanche, Joshua Pinkston (), Christopher Ruhm and George L. Wehby

Southern Economic Journal, 2016, vol. 82, issue 4, 1266-1310

Abstract: A growing literature examines the effects of economic variables on obesity, typically focusing on only one or a few factors at a time. We build a more comprehensive economic model of body weight, combining the 1990–2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System with 27 state‐level variables related to general economic conditions, labor supply, and the monetary or time costs of calorie intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking. Controlling for demographic characteristics and state and year fixed effects, changes in these economic variables collectively explain 37% of the rise in body mass index (BMI), 43% of the rise in obesity, and 59% of the rise in Class II/III obesity. Quantile regressions also point to large effects among the heaviest individuals, with half the rise in the 90th percentile of BMI explained by economic factors. Variables related to calorie intake—particularly restaurant and supercenter/warehouse club densities—are the primary drivers of the results.

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12130

Related works:
Working Paper: Can Changing Economic Factors Explain the Rise in Obesity? (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:soecon:v:82:y:2016:i:4:p:1266-1310

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2024-11-16
Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:82:y:2016:i:4:p:1266-1310