Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations

Daniel Chen and Martin Schonger

No 16-714, TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE)

Abstract: Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where a decision-maker not only takes into consideration her own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where a decision-maker makes her choice not only based on the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se have been rare. We propose an experimental method that can detect an individual’s deontological motivations by varying the probability of the decision-maker’s decision having consequences. It uses two states of the world, one where the decision has consequences and one where it has none. We show that a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance will choose the decision that leads to the best consequences regardless of the probability of the consequential state. A purely deontological decision-maker is also invariant to the probability. However, a mixed consequentialist-deontological decision-maker’s choice changes with the probability. The direction of change gives insight into the location of the optimand for one’s duty. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to detect deontological motivations and discuss the relevance of the theory and method for economics and law.

Keywords: Consequentialism; deontological motivations; normative commitments; social preferences; revealed preference; decision theory; first order stochastic dominance; random lottery incentive method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 K2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-10, Revised 2020-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm, nep-hpe, nep-law and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://users.nber.org/~dlchen/papers/Social_Prefer ... _ScienceAdvances.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Social preferences or sacred values? Theroy and evidence of deontological motivations (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tse:wpaper:31113

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in TSE Working Papers from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().