Employees as judges in European labour courts: A conflict of interests?
Susan Corby,
Pete Burgess and
Armin Höland
Additional contact information
Susan Corby: University of Greenwich, UK
Pete Burgess: University of Greenwich, UK
Armin Höland: Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle, Germany
European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2021, vol. 27, issue 3, 231-247
Abstract:
Labour courts in many European countries have a tripartite structure, with a professional judge sitting with employer and employee lay judges. This article focuses on employee judges, who face a potential conflict between their partisan role defending workers and their role as an impartial judge. Using cognitive dissonance as our theoretical framework and drawing on over a 100 interviews in three European countries, we found that many British and German interviewees said that they had not experienced any conflict of interests. Others, however, reported such conflict, especially initially, and demonstrated adaptation strategies that appeared consistent with cognitive dissonance theory. Moreover, there were national variations: conflict in France appeared more pervasive and enduring than in Britain or Germany.
Keywords: Britain; cognitive dissonance; conflict; employee judges; France; Germany; impartiality; judges; labour courts; tension (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959680120906631 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:eurjou:v:27:y:2021:i:3:p:231-247
DOI: 10.1177/0959680120906631
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in European Journal of Industrial Relations
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().