CAPITAL CONTROL, EXCHANGE RATE REGIME, AND MONETARY POLICY: INDETERMINACY AND BIFURCATION
William Barnett and
Jingxian Hu
Additional contact information
Jingxian Hu: The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise
No 139, Studies in Applied Economics from The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise
Abstract:
Will capital controls enhance macroeconomic stability? How will the results be influenced by the exchange rate regime and monetary policy reaction? Are the consequences of policy decisions involving capital controls easily predictable, or more complicated than may have been anticipated? We will answer the above questions by investigating the macroeconomic dynamics of a small open economy. In recent years, these matters have become particularly important to emerging market economies, which have often adopted capital controls. We especially investigate two dynamical characteristics: indeterminacy and bifurcation. Four cases are explored, based on different exchange rate regimes and monetary policy rules. With capital controls in place, we find that indeterminacy depends upon how the central bank’s response to inflation and its response to output gap coordinate with each other in the Taylor rule. When forward-looking, both passive and active monetary policy can lead to indeterminacy. Compared with flexible exchange rates, fixed exchange rate regimes produce more complex indeterminacy conditions, depending upon the stickiness of prices and the elasticity of substitution between labor and consumption. We show the existence of Hopf bifurcation under capital control with fixed exchange rates and current-looking monetary policy. To determine empirical relevance, we test indeterminacy empirically using Bayesian estimation. Fixed exchange rate regimes with capital controls produce larger posterior probability of the indeterminate region than a flexible exchange rate regime. Fixed exchange rate regimes with current-looking monetary policy lead to several kinds of bifurcation under capital controls. We provide monetary policy suggestions on achieving macroeconomic stability through financial regulation.
Keywords: Capital controls; open economy monetary policy; exchange rate regimes; Bayesian methods; bifurcation; indeterminacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C62 E52 F31 F38 F41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 65 pages
Date: 2019-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-mac, nep-mon and nep-opm
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2019/10/Ca ... -and-Bifurcation.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
Related works:
Working Paper: Capital Control, Exchange Rate Regime, and Monetary Policy: Indeterminacy and Bifurcation (2017)
Working Paper: Capital Control, Exchange Rate Regime, and Monetary Policy: Indeterminacy and Bifurcation (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ris:jhisae:0139
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Studies in Applied Economics from The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Steve H. Hanke ().