Globalization and Factor Income Taxation
Pierre Bachas,
Matthew Fisher-Post,
Anders Jensen () and
Gabriel Zucman
Additional contact information
Matthew Fisher-Post: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Anders Jensen: Harvard Kennedy School - Harvard Kennedy School, NBER - National Bureau of Economic Research [New York] - NBER - The National Bureau of Economic Research
PSE Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
How has globalization affected the relative taxation of labor and capital, and why? To address this question we build and analyze a new database of effective macroeconomic tax rates covering 150 countries since 1965, constructed by combining national accounts data with government revenue statistics. We obtain four main findings: (1) The effective tax rates on labor and capital converged globally since the 1960s, due to a 10 percentage-point increase in labor taxation and a 5 percentage-point decline in capital taxation. (2) The decline in capital taxation is concentrated in high-income countries. By contrast, capital taxation increased in developing countries since the 1990s, albeit from a low base.(3) Consistently across a variety of research designs, we find that the rise in capital taxation in developing countries can be explained by a tax-capacity effect of international trade: Trade openness leads to a concentration of economic activity in formal corporate structures, where capital taxes are easier to impose. (4) At the same time, international economic integration reduces statutory tax rates, due to increased tax competition. In highincome countries, this negative tax competition effect of trade has dominated, while in developing countries the positive tax-capacity effect of international trade appears to have prevailed.
Date: 2022-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int and nep-pbe
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03693211v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03693211v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Globalization and Factor Income Taxation (2022)
Working Paper: Globalization and Factor Income Taxation (2022)
Working Paper: Globalization and Factor Income Taxation (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-03693211
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in PSE Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().