Microplastic pollution in agricultural soils and abatement measures – a model-based assessment for Germany

Martin Henseler, Micheal Gallagher and Peter Kreins ()
Additional contact information
Micheal Gallagher: Quimper, France
Peter Kreins: Thünen Institute of Rural Studies - Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut = Thünen Institute

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Microplastic pollution in soils is a recent environmental problem and the lack of knowledge about the impacts and the extent of the problem are raising questions and concerns among researchers and politicians. Using a normative simulation model, we assess the extent of microplastic pollution in German agricultural soils originat-ing from the land application of sewage sludge and compost. We estimate the microplastic concentration in German agricultural soils, the area of polluted land, and we compare the efficiency and effectiveness of some selected abatement measures. For 2020, we estimate that microplastic concentration in agricultural soil reaches a maximum concentration of between 30 and 50 mg/kg dry weight on 2% of Utilised Agricultural Area and a marginal concentration on 22% of Utilised Agricultural Area. Without the implementation of abatement measures, we expect the microplastic concentration to increase two to three times by 2060. Assessing the abatement measures, we find that for sewage sludge, thermal recycling is a more efficient and effective than equipping washing machines with microplastic-filters in private households. The use of plastic detection systems in the biowaste collection process reduces the plastic content of the compost and thus the release of micro-plastic into the soil. Detection systems are a more efficient measure for compost than thermal recycling. Con-cerning sludge, the findings indicate that the German strategy of thermally recycling sewage sludge is an effi-cient and effective measure to reduce microplastic pollution in soils. Reducing the plastic content of collected biowaste complies with the principles a circular economy.

Keywords: Sewage sludge; Fertiliser; Recycling; Efficiency; Mitigation cost; Compost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-03-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-env and nep-res
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03176598v2
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 2022, ⟨10.1007/s10666-022-09826-5⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03176598v2/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03176598

DOI: 10.1007/s10666-022-09826-5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().