Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investment tasks
Eva Hoppe and
Patrick Schmitz
Journal of Public Economics, 2010, vol. 94, issue 3-4, 258-268
Abstract:
The government wants a certain good or service to be provided. Should the required assets be publicly or privately owned or should a partnership be formed? Building on the incomplete contracting approach, we argue that the initially specified quantity of an ex ante describable basic good can have important effects on investment incentives, which has been neglected in the literature so far. We also study how the tasks of investing in quality improvements and cost reductions should be assigned. We show how the optimal contracts and governance structures depend on the exogenous parameters of the model such as the nature of the investments and the parties' bargaining powers.
Keywords: Incomplete; contracts; Contractible; control; Privatization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (64)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2727(09)00149-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Public Versus Private Ownership: Quantity Contracts and the Allocation of Investment Tasks (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:94:y:2010:i:3-4:p:258-268
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba
More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().